The prevalence and clinical context of antimicrobial resistance amongst medical inpatients at a referral hospital in Rwanda: a cohort study

Olivier Bizimungu, Peter Crook, Jean Félix Babane, Léopold Bitunguhari
{"title":"The prevalence and clinical context of antimicrobial resistance amongst medical inpatients at a referral hospital in Rwanda: a cohort study","authors":"Olivier Bizimungu, Peter Crook, Jean Félix Babane, Léopold Bitunguhari","doi":"10.1186/s13756-024-01384-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global concern. AMR surveillance is a crucial component of the international response; however, passive surveillance of laboratory data is limited without corresponding patient-level clinical data. This study sought to examine the burden of AMR amongst medical inpatients in Rwanda, in the context of their clinical presentations and prior antibiotic exposures. This cohort study was conducted over a 9-month period at a tertiary referral hospital in Kigali, Rwanda. We enrolled 122 adult medical inpatients with a history of fever and a positive microbiological culture result. Data were collected regarding the clinical and microbiological aspects of their admission. The most common diagnoses were urinary tract infection (n = 36, 30%), followed by pneumonia (n = 30, 25%) and bacteraemia (11 primary [9%] and 10 catheter-related [8%]). The most common pathogens were E. coli (n = 40, 33%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 36, 30%). The cohort were heavily antibiotic-exposed at the time of culture with 98% of patients (n = 119) having received an antibiotic prior to culture, with a median exposure of 3 days (IQR 2–4 days). Eighty patients (66%) were specifically prescribed ceftriaxone at the time of culture. Gram-negative organisms predominated (82% [100/122]) and exhibited high rates of resistance, with only 27% (21/77) being susceptible to ceftriaxone, 2.4% (2/82) susceptible to co-amoxiclav and 44% (8/18) susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Susceptibility amongst Gram-negatives was relatively preserved to amikacin (91%, 79/87) and imipenem (85%, 70/82). There were no cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (0/12) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (0/2). Discordant antibiotic therapy was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 6.87, 95%CI 1.80–45.1, p = 0.014). This cohort highlights high rates of resistance amongst Gram-negative organisms in Rwanda, including the presence of carbapenem resistance. Nonetheless, the detailed prescribing data also highlight the challenges of using routine laboratory data to infer broader AMR prevalence. The significant exposure to empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy prior to culturing introduces a selection bias and risks over-estimating the burden of resistant organisms. Broadening access to microbiological services and active surveillance outside of teaching hospitals are essential to support national and international efforts to curb the growth of AMR in low-resource settings.","PeriodicalId":501612,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-024-01384-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global concern. AMR surveillance is a crucial component of the international response; however, passive surveillance of laboratory data is limited without corresponding patient-level clinical data. This study sought to examine the burden of AMR amongst medical inpatients in Rwanda, in the context of their clinical presentations and prior antibiotic exposures. This cohort study was conducted over a 9-month period at a tertiary referral hospital in Kigali, Rwanda. We enrolled 122 adult medical inpatients with a history of fever and a positive microbiological culture result. Data were collected regarding the clinical and microbiological aspects of their admission. The most common diagnoses were urinary tract infection (n = 36, 30%), followed by pneumonia (n = 30, 25%) and bacteraemia (11 primary [9%] and 10 catheter-related [8%]). The most common pathogens were E. coli (n = 40, 33%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 36, 30%). The cohort were heavily antibiotic-exposed at the time of culture with 98% of patients (n = 119) having received an antibiotic prior to culture, with a median exposure of 3 days (IQR 2–4 days). Eighty patients (66%) were specifically prescribed ceftriaxone at the time of culture. Gram-negative organisms predominated (82% [100/122]) and exhibited high rates of resistance, with only 27% (21/77) being susceptible to ceftriaxone, 2.4% (2/82) susceptible to co-amoxiclav and 44% (8/18) susceptible to ciprofloxacin. Susceptibility amongst Gram-negatives was relatively preserved to amikacin (91%, 79/87) and imipenem (85%, 70/82). There were no cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (0/12) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (0/2). Discordant antibiotic therapy was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (OR 6.87, 95%CI 1.80–45.1, p = 0.014). This cohort highlights high rates of resistance amongst Gram-negative organisms in Rwanda, including the presence of carbapenem resistance. Nonetheless, the detailed prescribing data also highlight the challenges of using routine laboratory data to infer broader AMR prevalence. The significant exposure to empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy prior to culturing introduces a selection bias and risks over-estimating the burden of resistant organisms. Broadening access to microbiological services and active surveillance outside of teaching hospitals are essential to support national and international efforts to curb the growth of AMR in low-resource settings.
卢旺达一家转诊医院住院病人抗菌药耐药性的流行情况和临床背景:一项队列研究
抗菌素耐药性 (AMR) 是一个日益受到全球关注的问题。AMR 监测是国际应对措施的重要组成部分;然而,如果没有相应的患者临床数据,对实验室数据的被动监测是有限的。这项研究旨在根据卢旺达住院病人的临床表现和之前的抗生素接触情况,研究他们的AMR负担。这项队列研究在卢旺达基加利的一家三级转诊医院进行,为期 9 个月。我们招募了 122 名有发热病史且微生物培养结果呈阳性的成年住院患者。我们收集了他们入院时的临床和微生物学数据。最常见的诊断是尿路感染(36 人,占 30%),其次是肺炎(30 人,占 25%)和菌血症(11 人原发[9%],10 人与导管相关[8%])。最常见的病原体是大肠杆菌(40 人,33%)和肺炎克雷伯菌(36 人,30%)。患者在进行培养时大量接触抗生素,98%的患者(n = 119)在培养前接受过抗生素治疗,接触时间中位数为 3 天(IQR 2-4 天)。80名患者(66%)在进行培养时特别处方了头孢曲松。革兰氏阴性菌占多数(82% [100/122]),并且耐药率很高,仅有 27% (21/77)的革兰氏阴性菌对头孢曲松敏感,2.4% (2/82)的革兰氏阴性菌对阿莫西林敏感,44% (8/18)的革兰氏阴性菌对环丙沙星敏感。革兰氏阴性菌对阿米卡星(91%,79/87)和亚胺培南(85%,70/82)的敏感性相对较低。没有出现耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(0/12)或耐万古霉素肠球菌(0/2)病例。不一致的抗生素治疗与院内死亡率显著相关(OR 6.87,95%CI 1.80-45.1,p = 0.014)。该队列突出显示了卢旺达革兰氏阴性菌的高耐药率,包括碳青霉烯耐药性的存在。尽管如此,详细的处方数据也凸显了使用常规实验室数据推断更广泛的 AMR 流行率所面临的挑战。在培养前大量接触经验性广谱抗生素治疗会带来选择偏差,并有可能高估耐药菌的负担。扩大教学医院以外的微生物服务范围并积极开展监测,对于支持国家和国际社会遏制低资源环境中 AMR 的增长至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信