Electrophysiological studies versus high-resolution nerve ultrasound in diagnosis of Guillain–Barré syndrome

Ahmed Abou Hagar, Mohamed Negm, Samer Elshamly, Osama Shehab, Walid Mosallam, Reda Abd El-Razek
{"title":"Electrophysiological studies versus high-resolution nerve ultrasound in diagnosis of Guillain–Barré syndrome","authors":"Ahmed Abou Hagar, Mohamed Negm, Samer Elshamly, Osama Shehab, Walid Mosallam, Reda Abd El-Razek","doi":"10.1186/s41983-024-00799-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) is polyneuropathy characterized by inflammation and immune-mediated processes that is classified into many subtypes based on electrophysiological and pathological criteria. The diagnosis of GBS can be confirmed using electrophysiological studies. However, electrophysiological studies may be normal when carried out early within 1 week in the course of the disease (Berciano et al. in J Neurol 264:221–236, 2017). One of the most useful imaging modalities for peripheral nerve diseases is ultrasonography (US). Nerve US in combination with electrophysiological studies provides an appropriate method in evaluating diseased peripheral nerves. This study aimed to enhance the reliability of early GBS diagnosis by correlating the findings of electrophysiological studies and nerve ultrasound. The nerve conduction studies (NCSs) in 37 GBS patients and 37 controls combined with cross-sectional area (CSA) assessment with US within the first 3 days of onset of symptoms and on day 14 after disease onset were evaluated. At presentation, patients and controls did not differ significantly in NCS parameters (p ≥ 0.05) except for a significantly longer F-wave minimum latency in the median, ulnar, and tibial nerves in patients (p < 0.001). While on day 14 all NCS parameters differed significantly in patients in comparison to controls (p < 0.001) with exception of the sural nerve parameters (p ≥ 0.05). Except for the sural nerve (p ≥ 0.05), all the examined nerves' CSAs were considerably higher in patients at presentation and on day 14 in comparison to the controls (p < 0.001). The subtypes of Guillain–Barré syndrome either demyelinating, axonal or mixed axonal and demyelinating did not significantly differ regarding the CSAs of all the examined nerves either at presentation or on day 14 (p > 0.05). Electrophysiological results in GBS are crucial in diagnosing the disease and understanding its pathophysiology, but serial NCSs are required. Ultrasound shows structural aspects of the nerve, so ultrasonography is a reliable tool which can be used in diagnosis and follow-up of early GBS. As a result, combining the two investigations has a complementary effect in the diagnosis and prognosis of GBS.","PeriodicalId":74995,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00799-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) is polyneuropathy characterized by inflammation and immune-mediated processes that is classified into many subtypes based on electrophysiological and pathological criteria. The diagnosis of GBS can be confirmed using electrophysiological studies. However, electrophysiological studies may be normal when carried out early within 1 week in the course of the disease (Berciano et al. in J Neurol 264:221–236, 2017). One of the most useful imaging modalities for peripheral nerve diseases is ultrasonography (US). Nerve US in combination with electrophysiological studies provides an appropriate method in evaluating diseased peripheral nerves. This study aimed to enhance the reliability of early GBS diagnosis by correlating the findings of electrophysiological studies and nerve ultrasound. The nerve conduction studies (NCSs) in 37 GBS patients and 37 controls combined with cross-sectional area (CSA) assessment with US within the first 3 days of onset of symptoms and on day 14 after disease onset were evaluated. At presentation, patients and controls did not differ significantly in NCS parameters (p ≥ 0.05) except for a significantly longer F-wave minimum latency in the median, ulnar, and tibial nerves in patients (p < 0.001). While on day 14 all NCS parameters differed significantly in patients in comparison to controls (p < 0.001) with exception of the sural nerve parameters (p ≥ 0.05). Except for the sural nerve (p ≥ 0.05), all the examined nerves' CSAs were considerably higher in patients at presentation and on day 14 in comparison to the controls (p < 0.001). The subtypes of Guillain–Barré syndrome either demyelinating, axonal or mixed axonal and demyelinating did not significantly differ regarding the CSAs of all the examined nerves either at presentation or on day 14 (p > 0.05). Electrophysiological results in GBS are crucial in diagnosing the disease and understanding its pathophysiology, but serial NCSs are required. Ultrasound shows structural aspects of the nerve, so ultrasonography is a reliable tool which can be used in diagnosis and follow-up of early GBS. As a result, combining the two investigations has a complementary effect in the diagnosis and prognosis of GBS.
电生理研究与高分辨率神经超声在诊断格林-巴利综合征中的比较
吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)是一种以炎症和免疫介导过程为特征的多发性神经病,根据电生理学和病理学标准可分为多种亚型。GBS 的诊断可通过电生理学研究来确认。然而,在病程 1 周内早期进行的电生理检查可能是正常的(Berciano 等,载于 J Neurol 264:221-236,2017 年)。对周围神经疾病最有用的成像方式之一是超声波成像(US)。神经 US 结合电生理学研究为评估患病的周围神经提供了一种合适的方法。本研究旨在通过将电生理检查和神经超声检查结果进行关联,提高早期 GBS 诊断的可靠性。研究评估了 37 名 GBS 患者和 37 名对照组患者的神经传导研究(NCSs),并在症状出现后的头 3 天和发病后的第 14 天用 US 评估了横截面积(CSA)。发病时,除了患者正中神经、尺神经和胫神经的 F 波最小潜伏期明显较长外(P 0.05),患者和对照组在 NCS 参数上没有明显差异(P ≥ 0.05)。GBS 的电生理结果对诊断该病和了解其病理生理学至关重要,但需要进行连续的 NCS 检查。超声波能显示神经的结构,因此超声波检查是一种可靠的工具,可用于早期 GBS 的诊断和随访。因此,将这两种检查结合起来,对 GBS 的诊断和预后有互补作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信