Leveraging privacy profiles to empower users in the digital society

IF 2 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Davide Di Ruscio, Paola Inverardi, Patrizio Migliarini, Phuong T. Nguyen
{"title":"Leveraging privacy profiles to empower users in the digital society","authors":"Davide Di Ruscio,&nbsp;Paola Inverardi,&nbsp;Patrizio Migliarini,&nbsp;Phuong T. Nguyen","doi":"10.1007/s10515-024-00415-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Protecting privacy and ethics of citizens is among the core concerns raised by an increasingly digital society. Profiling users is common practice for software applications triggering the need for users, also enforced by laws, to manage privacy settings properly. Users need to properly manage these settings to protect personally identifiable information and express personal ethical preferences. This has shown to be very difficult for several concurrent reasons. However, profiling technologies can also empower users in their interaction with the digital world by reflecting personal ethical preferences and allowing for automatizing/assisting users in privacy settings. In this way, if properly reflecting users’ preferences, privacy profiling can become a key enabler for a trustworthy digital society. We focus on characterizing/collecting users’ privacy preferences and contribute a step in this direction through an empirical study on an existing dataset collected from the fitness domain. We aim to understand which set of questions is more appropriate to differentiate users according to their privacy preferences. The results reveal that a compact set of semantic-driven questions (about domain-independent privacy preferences) helps distinguish users better than a complex domain-dependent one. Based on the outcome, we implement a recommender system to provide users with suitable recommendations related to privacy choices. We then show that the proposed recommender system provides relevant settings to users, obtaining high accuracy.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55414,"journal":{"name":"Automated Software Engineering","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10515-024-00415-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-024-00415-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protecting privacy and ethics of citizens is among the core concerns raised by an increasingly digital society. Profiling users is common practice for software applications triggering the need for users, also enforced by laws, to manage privacy settings properly. Users need to properly manage these settings to protect personally identifiable information and express personal ethical preferences. This has shown to be very difficult for several concurrent reasons. However, profiling technologies can also empower users in their interaction with the digital world by reflecting personal ethical preferences and allowing for automatizing/assisting users in privacy settings. In this way, if properly reflecting users’ preferences, privacy profiling can become a key enabler for a trustworthy digital society. We focus on characterizing/collecting users’ privacy preferences and contribute a step in this direction through an empirical study on an existing dataset collected from the fitness domain. We aim to understand which set of questions is more appropriate to differentiate users according to their privacy preferences. The results reveal that a compact set of semantic-driven questions (about domain-independent privacy preferences) helps distinguish users better than a complex domain-dependent one. Based on the outcome, we implement a recommender system to provide users with suitable recommendations related to privacy choices. We then show that the proposed recommender system provides relevant settings to users, obtaining high accuracy.

Abstract Image

利用隐私档案增强用户在数字社会中的能力
保护公民的隐私和道德是日益数字化的社会所关注的核心问题之一。对用户进行分析是软件应用程序的常见做法,这就要求用户正确管理隐私设置,同时法律也强制要求用户这样做。用户需要正确管理这些设置,以保护个人身份信息和表达个人道德偏好。由于一些并存的原因,这一点已被证明是非常困难的。然而,通过反映个人道德偏好并允许自动/协助用户进行隐私设置,特征分析技术也能增强用户与数字世界互动的能力。这样,如果能正确反映用户的偏好,隐私分析就能成为建立一个值得信赖的数字社会的关键因素。我们的重点是描述/收集用户的隐私偏好,并通过对健身领域收集的现有数据集进行实证研究,朝这个方向迈出了一步。我们旨在了解哪组问题更适合根据用户的隐私偏好来区分他们。研究结果表明,与复杂的与领域相关的问题相比,语义驱动型问题集(与领域无关的隐私偏好)更有助于区分用户。在此基础上,我们实施了一个推荐系统,为用户提供与隐私选择相关的合适推荐。随后,我们展示了所提出的推荐系统为用户提供的相关设置,并获得了较高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Automated Software Engineering
Automated Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal details research, tutorial papers, survey and accounts of significant industrial experience in the foundations, techniques, tools and applications of automated software engineering technology. This includes the study of techniques for constructing, understanding, adapting, and modeling software artifacts and processes. Coverage in Automated Software Engineering examines both automatic systems and collaborative systems as well as computational models of human software engineering activities. In addition, it presents knowledge representations and artificial intelligence techniques applicable to automated software engineering, and formal techniques that support or provide theoretical foundations. The journal also includes reviews of books, software, conferences and workshops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信