Steroids and myocardial infarction: Investigating safety and short-term mortality in critical post-myocardial infarction patients

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Madiha Masroor FCPS, Muhammad Imran Ansari FCPS, Madiha Umair MBBS, Lalarukh Taimoor FCPS, Mujtaba Hassan FCPS, Muhammad Sohaib Arif FCPS, Musa Karim MSc, Jawed Abubaker MD, FCCP
{"title":"Steroids and myocardial infarction: Investigating safety and short-term mortality in critical post-myocardial infarction patients","authors":"Madiha Masroor FCPS,&nbsp;Muhammad Imran Ansari FCPS,&nbsp;Madiha Umair MBBS,&nbsp;Lalarukh Taimoor FCPS,&nbsp;Mujtaba Hassan FCPS,&nbsp;Muhammad Sohaib Arif FCPS,&nbsp;Musa Karim MSc,&nbsp;Jawed Abubaker MD, FCCP","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Conventionally, in the pre-percutaneous intervention era, free wall rupture is reported to be a major concern for using steroids in myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the use of steroids in critically ill post-MI patients in terms of hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included patients admitted to CCU diagnosed with MI, undergone revascularization, critically ill, and requiring mechanical ventilator (MV) support. The hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality were independently compared between steroid and non-steroid cohorts and propensity-matched non-steroid cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 312 patients were included, out of which steroids were used in 93 (29.8%) patients during their management. On periodic bedside echocardiography, no free wall rupture was documented in the steroid or non-steroid cohort. When compared steroids with a propensity-matched non-steroid cohort, MV duration &gt;24 h was 66.7% vs. 59.1%; <em>p</em> = 0.288, major bleeding was 6.5% vs. 3.2%; <em>p</em> = 0.305, need for renal replacement therapy was 9.7% vs. 8.6%; <em>p</em> = 0.799, in-hospital mortality was 35.5% vs. 23.7%; <em>p</em> = 0.077, and 180-day mortality was 48.4% vs. 41.9%; <em>p</em> = 0.377, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.22 [95% CI: 0.80 to 1.88] compared to the propensity-matched non-steroid cohort. The ejection fraction (%) was found to be the independent predictor of 180-day mortality with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.92 [95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In conclusion, using steroids is safe in post-MI patients with no significant increase in short-term mortality risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55526,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of the Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of the Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002962924011005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Conventionally, in the pre-percutaneous intervention era, free wall rupture is reported to be a major concern for using steroids in myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the use of steroids in critically ill post-MI patients in terms of hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality.

Methods

We included patients admitted to CCU diagnosed with MI, undergone revascularization, critically ill, and requiring mechanical ventilator (MV) support. The hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality were independently compared between steroid and non-steroid cohorts and propensity-matched non-steroid cohorts.

Results

A total of 312 patients were included, out of which steroids were used in 93 (29.8%) patients during their management. On periodic bedside echocardiography, no free wall rupture was documented in the steroid or non-steroid cohort. When compared steroids with a propensity-matched non-steroid cohort, MV duration >24 h was 66.7% vs. 59.1%; p = 0.288, major bleeding was 6.5% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.305, need for renal replacement therapy was 9.7% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.799, in-hospital mortality was 35.5% vs. 23.7%; p = 0.077, and 180-day mortality was 48.4% vs. 41.9%; p = 0.377, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.22 [95% CI: 0.80 to 1.88] compared to the propensity-matched non-steroid cohort. The ejection fraction (%) was found to be the independent predictor of 180-day mortality with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.92 [95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98].

Conclusions

In conclusion, using steroids is safe in post-MI patients with no significant increase in short-term mortality risk.

类固醇与心肌梗塞:调查心肌梗塞后危重患者的安全性和短期死亡率
传统上,在经皮介入治疗前的时代,游离壁破裂是心肌梗死(MI)患者使用类固醇的主要顾虑。因此,本研究旨在从住院过程和短期(最多 180 天)死亡率的角度评估心肌梗死后重症患者使用类固醇的安全性。我们纳入了被诊断为心肌梗死、接受过血管重建术、病情危重且需要机械呼吸机(MV)支持的 CCU 住院患者。我们对类固醇组和非类固醇组以及倾向匹配的非类固醇组的住院过程和短期(180 天内)死亡率进行了独立比较。共纳入了 312 例患者,其中 93 例(29.8%)患者在治疗过程中使用了类固醇。在定期床旁超声心动图检查中,类固醇和非类固醇患者均未发现游离壁破裂。类固醇与倾向匹配的非类固醇队列相比,MV持续时间大于24小时的比例分别为66.7%和59.1%;P=0.288;大出血比例分别为6.5%和3.2%;P=0.305;需要肾脏替代治疗的比例分别为9.7%和8.6%;P=0.799;院内死亡率分别为35.5%和23.7%;P=0.077;180天死亡率分别为48.4%和41.9%;P=0.377。与倾向匹配的非类固醇队列相比,危险比为1.22 [95% CI:0.80至1.88]。研究发现,射血分数(%)是预测 180 天死亡率的独立指标,调整后的赔率为 0.92 [95% CI:0.86 至 0.98]。总之,对心肌梗死后患者使用类固醇是安全的,不会显著增加短期死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
303
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of The Medical Sciences (AJMS), founded in 1820, is the 2nd oldest medical journal in the United States. The AJMS is the official journal of the Southern Society for Clinical Investigation (SSCI). The SSCI is dedicated to the advancement of medical research and the exchange of knowledge, information and ideas. Its members are committed to mentoring future generations of medical investigators and promoting careers in academic medicine. The AJMS publishes, on a monthly basis, peer-reviewed articles in the field of internal medicine and its subspecialties, which include: Original clinical and basic science investigations Review articles Online Images in the Medical Sciences Special Features Include: Patient-Centered Focused Reviews History of Medicine The Science of Medical Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信