Interpectoral nerve blocks may lower postoperative narcotic use after mastectomy

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ricardo J. Bello , Benjamin A. Palleiko , Kara Kennedy, Lauren Cournoyer, Anne C. Larkin, Kate H. Dinh, Jennifer LaFemina
{"title":"Interpectoral nerve blocks may lower postoperative narcotic use after mastectomy","authors":"Ricardo J. Bello ,&nbsp;Benjamin A. Palleiko ,&nbsp;Kara Kennedy,&nbsp;Lauren Cournoyer,&nbsp;Anne C. Larkin,&nbsp;Kate H. Dinh,&nbsp;Jennifer LaFemina","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pain management following mastectomy is a significant challenge often requiring opioids. Nonopioid pain management utilizing nerve blocks has been shown in other fields to reduce postoperative opioid use and may be effective for postoperative pain in mastectomy patients. The primary purpose of this study was to compare postoperative opioid use, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), between mastectomy patients who underwent interpectoral nerve block (IPNB) and a historical control group. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and postoperative pain scores.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. The charts of women who underwent mastectomy for cancer without immediate reconstruction from 10/2017–12/2019 were reviewed. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for unadjusted analysis and multiple linear regression for adjusted analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 105 patients included in this study, of which 37 (35%) underwent IPNB. In unadjusted analysis, median MME use was significantly lower in patients that received IPNB compared to the control group (IPNB = 5, controls = 17, <em>p</em> = 0.03). Patients that received IPNB had an observed reduction in LOS and postoperative pain, though these results failed to reach statistical significance. There were no IPNB-related complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IPNB may be an effective strategy to decrease postoperative opioid use in mastectomy patients. Larger, prospective studies are needed to further investigate the effectiveness of IPNB.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pain management following mastectomy is a significant challenge often requiring opioids. Nonopioid pain management utilizing nerve blocks has been shown in other fields to reduce postoperative opioid use and may be effective for postoperative pain in mastectomy patients. The primary purpose of this study was to compare postoperative opioid use, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), between mastectomy patients who underwent interpectoral nerve block (IPNB) and a historical control group. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and postoperative pain scores.

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. The charts of women who underwent mastectomy for cancer without immediate reconstruction from 10/2017–12/2019 were reviewed. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for unadjusted analysis and multiple linear regression for adjusted analysis.

Results

There were 105 patients included in this study, of which 37 (35%) underwent IPNB. In unadjusted analysis, median MME use was significantly lower in patients that received IPNB compared to the control group (IPNB = 5, controls = 17, p = 0.03). Patients that received IPNB had an observed reduction in LOS and postoperative pain, though these results failed to reach statistical significance. There were no IPNB-related complications.

Conclusions

IPNB may be an effective strategy to decrease postoperative opioid use in mastectomy patients. Larger, prospective studies are needed to further investigate the effectiveness of IPNB.

胸大肌间神经阻滞可降低乳房切除术后麻醉剂的使用量
背景乳房切除术后的疼痛治疗是一项重大挑战,通常需要使用阿片类药物。其他领域的研究表明,利用神经阻滞进行非阿片类药物止痛可减少术后阿片类药物的使用,对乳腺切除术患者的术后疼痛可能有效。本研究的主要目的是比较接受乳头间神经阻滞(IPNB)的乳腺切除术患者与历史对照组的术后阿片类药物用量(以吗啡毫克当量(MME)计)。次要结果包括住院时间(LOS)和术后疼痛评分。研究回顾了2017年10月至2019年12月期间因癌症接受乳房切除术但未立即进行重建的女性病历。结果本研究共纳入 105 例患者,其中 37 例(35%)接受了 IPNB。在未经调整的分析中,与对照组相比,接受 IPNB 的患者 MME 使用量中位数明显降低(IPNB = 5,对照组 = 17,P = 0.03)。据观察,接受 IPNB 治疗的患者的住院时间和术后疼痛均有所缩短,但这些结果均未达到统计学意义。结论IPNB可能是减少乳房切除术患者术后阿片类药物使用的有效策略。需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究来进一步探讨 IPNB 的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信