Religious-Zionist Right-Wing Israelis: Their Expectations of Archeological Research in Judea and Samaria and Their Ways of Contending With the Resulting Complicated Findings

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
MODERN JUDAISM Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI:10.1093/mj/kjae007
Mordechay Lash
{"title":"Religious-Zionist Right-Wing Israelis: Their Expectations of Archeological Research in Judea and Samaria and Their Ways of Contending With the Resulting Complicated Findings","authors":"Mordechay Lash","doi":"10.1093/mj/kjae007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The encounter between West Bank settlers and the archeologists who came to survey and excavate in their midst at the beginning of the 1980s was a formative moment that led to the settlers’ embrace of the field of archeology. The findings of the surveys and excavations that were conducted in the region, however, raised new insights regarding the early years of the Jewish People and the historical reliability of some of the biblical texts, forcing the settlers to face a complicated reality. Except for their selective adoption of researchers and of conclusions they viewed as supporting the biblical narrative, the settlers accused researchers who presented new conclusions of nontopical deviation and presented an alternative paradigm of their own that does not stand up to criticism. In contrast, researchers from the second generation of West Bank settlers have employed a more professional approach to archeology and do not see themselves as using it to prove identity or ownership. It appears that, in addition to academic influences and their sense of “indigenousness,” this reality is the product of a fundamental crisis that has befallen the religious-ideological public, the thrust of which has been a deconstruction of the harmony of the messianic vision, one expression of which has been the changing intergenerational approach to the role of archeology.","PeriodicalId":54089,"journal":{"name":"MODERN JUDAISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN JUDAISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mj/kjae007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The encounter between West Bank settlers and the archeologists who came to survey and excavate in their midst at the beginning of the 1980s was a formative moment that led to the settlers’ embrace of the field of archeology. The findings of the surveys and excavations that were conducted in the region, however, raised new insights regarding the early years of the Jewish People and the historical reliability of some of the biblical texts, forcing the settlers to face a complicated reality. Except for their selective adoption of researchers and of conclusions they viewed as supporting the biblical narrative, the settlers accused researchers who presented new conclusions of nontopical deviation and presented an alternative paradigm of their own that does not stand up to criticism. In contrast, researchers from the second generation of West Bank settlers have employed a more professional approach to archeology and do not see themselves as using it to prove identity or ownership. It appears that, in addition to academic influences and their sense of “indigenousness,” this reality is the product of a fundamental crisis that has befallen the religious-ideological public, the thrust of which has been a deconstruction of the harmony of the messianic vision, one expression of which has been the changing intergenerational approach to the role of archeology.
以色列宗教-犹太复国主义右翼分子:他们对朱迪亚和撒马利亚考古研究的期望,以及他们应对由此产生的复杂发现的方法
20 世纪 80 年代初,西岸定居者与前来调查和发掘的考古学家相遇,这是定居者接受考 古学领域的重要时刻。然而,在该地区进行的调查和发掘结果却对犹太民族的早期历史以及某些圣经文本的历史可靠性提出了新的见解,迫使定居者面对复杂的现实。除了有选择地采纳研究人员和他们认为支持《圣经》叙事的结论外,定居者还指责提出新结论的研究人员偏离了主题,并提出了他们自己的另一种经不起批评的范式。相比之下,西岸第二代定居者的研究人员采用了更加专业的考古方法,他们并不认为自己是在利用考古来证明身份或所有权。看来,除了学术影响和他们的 "本土意识 "之外,这一现实也是宗教-意识形态公众所遭遇的根本危机的产物,其主旨是解构弥赛亚愿景的和谐,其表现形式之一就是对考古学作用的代际方法的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MODERN JUDAISM
MODERN JUDAISM HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Modern Judaism: A Journal of Jewish Ideas and Experience provides a distinctive, interdisciplinary forum for discussion of the modern Jewish experience. Articles focus on topics pertinent to the understanding of Jewish life today and the forces that have shaped that experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信