{"title":"A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization","authors":"Yong-Jun Liu , Guo-Sen Yang , Wei-Guo Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As climate change intensifies, more and more people realize that it is necessary and urgent to optimize energy structure through constructing energy asset portfolios. However, most of existing literature on energy asset portfolio models neglects real market restrictions, and the related portfolio performance evaluation approaches ignore the impact of the psychological factors of decision makers (DMs) on evaluation results, which limit their applications. To overcome these limitations, we first present a mean-WMCVaR (MWMC) model for energy stock portfolio selection with real features. Then, we employ the proposed MWMC model and its closely related works to yield a set of investment schemes and determine their characteristic index values including mean, WMCVaR, carbon intensity and ESG. Subsequently, we present a novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency (NRRCE) approach to evaluate the performance of these investment schemes, and then make a comparison with the ones of the other seven competitive evaluation approaches by using an empirical example. Empirical results show that the proposed MWMC model can yield an optimal investment scheme with a better trade-off between economic and ecological benefits, and our NRRCE approach can effectively provide reasonable and reliable evaluation results for different investment schemes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As climate change intensifies, more and more people realize that it is necessary and urgent to optimize energy structure through constructing energy asset portfolios. However, most of existing literature on energy asset portfolio models neglects real market restrictions, and the related portfolio performance evaluation approaches ignore the impact of the psychological factors of decision makers (DMs) on evaluation results, which limit their applications. To overcome these limitations, we first present a mean-WMCVaR (MWMC) model for energy stock portfolio selection with real features. Then, we employ the proposed MWMC model and its closely related works to yield a set of investment schemes and determine their characteristic index values including mean, WMCVaR, carbon intensity and ESG. Subsequently, we present a novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency (NRRCE) approach to evaluate the performance of these investment schemes, and then make a comparison with the ones of the other seven competitive evaluation approaches by using an empirical example. Empirical results show that the proposed MWMC model can yield an optimal investment scheme with a better trade-off between economic and ecological benefits, and our NRRCE approach can effectively provide reasonable and reliable evaluation results for different investment schemes.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.