Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Pediatric respiratory infectious disease

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Joshua Belfer MD, Cindy G. Roskind MD, Andrew Grock MD, JooYeon Jung MD, Shirley W. Bae MD, Lisa Zhao MD, Brad Sobolewski MD, MEd
{"title":"Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Pediatric respiratory infectious disease","authors":"Joshua Belfer MD,&nbsp;Cindy G. Roskind MD,&nbsp;Andrew Grock MD,&nbsp;JooYeon Jung MD,&nbsp;Shirley W. Bae MD,&nbsp;Lisa Zhao MD,&nbsp;Brad Sobolewski MD, MEd","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Free open access medical education (FOAM) resources have become increasingly popular in graduate medical education. Despite their accessibility, the assessment of FOAM resources’ quality is challenging due to their decentralized nature and the diverse qualifications of their authors and distribution platforms. In this first pediatric systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review, we utilized a systematic methodology to aggregate and assess the quality of FOAM resources on pediatric respiratory infectious disease topics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched 177 keywords using FOAMSearch, the top 50 FOAM websites on the Social Media Index, and seven additional pediatric emergency medicine–focused blogs. Following a basic initial screen, resources then underwent full-text quality assessment utilizing the revised Medical Education Translational Resources: Impact and Quality (rMETRIQ) tool.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The search yielded 44,897 resources. After 44,456 were excluded, 441 underwent quality assessment. A total of 36/441 posts (8% of posts) reached the high-quality threshold score (rMETRIQ ≥ 16). The most frequent topics overall were pneumonia and bronchiolitis. A total of 67/441 posts (15% of posts) were found to have a rMETRIQ score of less than or equal to 7, which may indicate poor quality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We systematically identified, described, and performed quality assessment on FOAM resources pertaining to the topic of pediatric respiratory infectious disease. We found that there is a paucity of high-quality posts on this topic. Despite this, the curated list of high-quality resources can help guide trainees and educators toward relevant educational information and suggest unmet needs for future FOAM resources.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Free open access medical education (FOAM) resources have become increasingly popular in graduate medical education. Despite their accessibility, the assessment of FOAM resources’ quality is challenging due to their decentralized nature and the diverse qualifications of their authors and distribution platforms. In this first pediatric systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review, we utilized a systematic methodology to aggregate and assess the quality of FOAM resources on pediatric respiratory infectious disease topics.

Methods

We searched 177 keywords using FOAMSearch, the top 50 FOAM websites on the Social Media Index, and seven additional pediatric emergency medicine–focused blogs. Following a basic initial screen, resources then underwent full-text quality assessment utilizing the revised Medical Education Translational Resources: Impact and Quality (rMETRIQ) tool.

Results

The search yielded 44,897 resources. After 44,456 were excluded, 441 underwent quality assessment. A total of 36/441 posts (8% of posts) reached the high-quality threshold score (rMETRIQ ≥ 16). The most frequent topics overall were pneumonia and bronchiolitis. A total of 67/441 posts (15% of posts) were found to have a rMETRIQ score of less than or equal to 7, which may indicate poor quality.

Conclusions

We systematically identified, described, and performed quality assessment on FOAM resources pertaining to the topic of pediatric respiratory infectious disease. We found that there is a paucity of high-quality posts on this topic. Despite this, the curated list of high-quality resources can help guide trainees and educators toward relevant educational information and suggest unmet needs for future FOAM resources.

系统性在线学术资源(SOAR)回顾:小儿呼吸道传染病
背景 免费开放医学教育(FOAM)资源在医学研究生教育中越来越受欢迎。尽管这些资源很容易获取,但由于其分散的性质以及作者和发布平台的资质各不相同,因此对其质量进行评估具有挑战性。在这篇儿科系统性在线学术资源(SOAR)综述中,我们采用了一种系统的方法来汇总和评估有关儿科呼吸道传染病主题的 FOAM 资源的质量。 方法 我们使用 FOAMSearch 搜索了 177 个关键词、社交媒体索引中排名前 50 的 FOAM 网站以及另外 7 个以儿科急诊医学为重点的博客。在进行了基本的初步筛选后,我们利用修订后的医学教育转化资源进行了全文质量评估:影响和质量 (rMETRIQ) 工具进行全文质量评估。 结果 搜索到 44,897 条资源。排除 44456 篇后,对 441 篇进行了质量评估。共有 36/441 篇帖子(占帖子总数的 8%)达到了高质量阈值分数(rMETRIQ ≥ 16)。最常见的主题是肺炎和支气管炎。共有 67/441 篇帖子(占帖子总数的 15%)的 rMETRIQ 分数小于或等于 7,这可能表明帖子质量较差。 结论 我们对有关儿科呼吸道传染病主题的 FOAM 资源进行了系统的识别、描述和质量评估。我们发现,有关这一主题的高质量文章很少。尽管如此,高质量资源的策划列表有助于引导学员和教育工作者了解相关的教育信息,并为未来的 FOAM 资源提出尚未满足的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信