In situ coal permeability and favorable development methods for coalbed methane (CBM) extraction in China: From real data

IF 5.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Shida Chen , Shu Tao , Dazhen Tang
{"title":"In situ coal permeability and favorable development methods for coalbed methane (CBM) extraction in China: From real data","authors":"Shida Chen ,&nbsp;Shu Tao ,&nbsp;Dazhen Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.coal.2024.104472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Permeability plays a significant role in the economic viability of coalbed methane (CBM) development. In China, in situ permeability obtained from injection fall-off tests range from 0.0001 to 41 mD at depths of 130–1728 m, with the majority (78%) falling between 0.01 and 1 mD. Coal reservoirs with high rank, common cleat mineralization, and depth-dependent high stress may result in extremely low permeability. Low-rank coal and cataclastic coal exhibit more favorable permeability conditions at shallow depths. Heterogeneity in coal rank, coal texture, and stress magnitude results in a discrete distribution of permeability both regionally and vertically. Most deep seams are highly compressed with extremely low permeability (&lt;0.1 mD) as high stress levels. Multilateral horizontal wells work best with high permeability seams, while vertical wells with conventional hydraulic fracturing demonstrate limited adaptability to deep and low-permeability seams due to insufficient proppant-supported fractures. With increasing depth, both vertical and horizontal wells should employ larger fracturing scales to create effectively supported zones with higher fracture conductivity and reduced stress sensitivity to enhance CBM productivity. Horizontal wells with large-scale volume fracturing demonstrate superior performance compared to vertical wells in extracting CBM from deep, low-permeability, and high gas saturation reservoirs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13864,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coal Geology","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 104472"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coal Geology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516224000296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Permeability plays a significant role in the economic viability of coalbed methane (CBM) development. In China, in situ permeability obtained from injection fall-off tests range from 0.0001 to 41 mD at depths of 130–1728 m, with the majority (78%) falling between 0.01 and 1 mD. Coal reservoirs with high rank, common cleat mineralization, and depth-dependent high stress may result in extremely low permeability. Low-rank coal and cataclastic coal exhibit more favorable permeability conditions at shallow depths. Heterogeneity in coal rank, coal texture, and stress magnitude results in a discrete distribution of permeability both regionally and vertically. Most deep seams are highly compressed with extremely low permeability (<0.1 mD) as high stress levels. Multilateral horizontal wells work best with high permeability seams, while vertical wells with conventional hydraulic fracturing demonstrate limited adaptability to deep and low-permeability seams due to insufficient proppant-supported fractures. With increasing depth, both vertical and horizontal wells should employ larger fracturing scales to create effectively supported zones with higher fracture conductivity and reduced stress sensitivity to enhance CBM productivity. Horizontal wells with large-scale volume fracturing demonstrate superior performance compared to vertical wells in extracting CBM from deep, low-permeability, and high gas saturation reservoirs.

中国煤层气(CBM)开采的原地煤渗透率和有利开发方法:从真实数据出发
渗透率对煤层气开发的经济可行性起着重要作用。在中国,通过注入落差测试获得的原位渗透率范围在 0.0001 至 41 mD 之间,深度为 130 至 1728 米,其中大部分(78%)在 0.01 至 1 mD 之间。高阶煤、常见裂隙矿化和随深度变化的高应力煤储层可能导致极低的渗透率。低阶煤和碎屑岩煤在浅层表现出更有利的渗透条件。煤炭等级、煤炭质地和应力大小的异质性导致透水性在区域和垂直方向上的离散分布。大多数深煤层在高应力水平下具有极低的渗透率(<0.1 mD),从而造成高度压缩。多边水平井对高渗透率煤层效果最佳,而采用常规水力压裂法的垂直井由于支撑裂缝的支撑剂不足,对深层低渗透率煤层的适应性有限。随着深度的增加,垂直井和水平井都应采用更大的压裂规模,以形成具有更高的裂缝传导性和更低的应力敏感性的有效支撑区,从而提高煤层气生产率。与垂直井相比,采用大体积压裂的水平井在从深层、低渗透率和高气体饱和度储层开采煤层气方面表现出更优越的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Coal Geology
International Journal of Coal Geology 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
145
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Coal Geology deals with fundamental and applied aspects of the geology and petrology of coal, oil/gas source rocks and shale gas resources. The journal aims to advance the exploration, exploitation and utilization of these resources, and to stimulate environmental awareness as well as advancement of engineering for effective resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信