Rural–urban disparities in health care delivery for children with medical complexity and moderating effects of payer, disability, and community poverty
Mary Arakelyan MPH, Seneca D. Freyleue MS, Andrew P. Schaefer PhD, Andrea M. Austin PhD, Erika L. Moen PhD, A. James O'Malley PhD, David C. Goodman MD, MS, JoAnna K. Leyenaar MD, PhD, MPH
{"title":"Rural–urban disparities in health care delivery for children with medical complexity and moderating effects of payer, disability, and community poverty","authors":"Mary Arakelyan MPH, Seneca D. Freyleue MS, Andrew P. Schaefer PhD, Andrea M. Austin PhD, Erika L. Moen PhD, A. James O'Malley PhD, David C. Goodman MD, MS, JoAnna K. Leyenaar MD, PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Children with medical complexity (CMC) may be at increased risk of rural–urban disparities in health care delivery given their multifaceted health care needs, but these disparities are poorly understood. This study evaluated rural–urban disparities in health care delivery to CMC and determined whether Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disability, and community poverty modified the effects of rurality on care delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective cohort study of 2012–2017 all-payer claims data from Colorado, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire included CMC <18 years. Health care delivery measures (ambulatory clinic visits, emergency department visits, acute care hospitalizations, total hospital days, and receipt of post-acute care) were compared for rural- versus urban-residing CMC in multivariable regression models, following established methods to evaluate effect modification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Of 112,475 CMC, 7307 (6.5%) were rural residing and 105,168 (93.5%) were urban residing. A total of 68.9% had Medicaid coverage, 33.9% had a disability, and 39.7% lived in communities with >20% child poverty. In adjusted analyses, rural-residing CMC received significantly fewer ambulatory visits (risk ratio [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–0.96), more emergency visits (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.16), and fewer hospitalization days (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85–0.96). The estimated modification effects of rural residence by Medicaid coverage, disability, and community poverty were each statistically significant. Differences in the odds of having a hospitalization and receiving post-acute care did not persist after incorporating sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and interaction effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Rural- and urban-residing CMC differed in their receipt of health care, and Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disabilities, and community poverty modified several of these effects. These modifying effects should be considered in clinical and policy initiatives to ensure that such initiatives do not widen rural–urban disparities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Children with medical complexity (CMC) may be at increased risk of rural–urban disparities in health care delivery given their multifaceted health care needs, but these disparities are poorly understood. This study evaluated rural–urban disparities in health care delivery to CMC and determined whether Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disability, and community poverty modified the effects of rurality on care delivery.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study of 2012–2017 all-payer claims data from Colorado, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire included CMC <18 years. Health care delivery measures (ambulatory clinic visits, emergency department visits, acute care hospitalizations, total hospital days, and receipt of post-acute care) were compared for rural- versus urban-residing CMC in multivariable regression models, following established methods to evaluate effect modification.
Findings
Of 112,475 CMC, 7307 (6.5%) were rural residing and 105,168 (93.5%) were urban residing. A total of 68.9% had Medicaid coverage, 33.9% had a disability, and 39.7% lived in communities with >20% child poverty. In adjusted analyses, rural-residing CMC received significantly fewer ambulatory visits (risk ratio [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–0.96), more emergency visits (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08–1.16), and fewer hospitalization days (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85–0.96). The estimated modification effects of rural residence by Medicaid coverage, disability, and community poverty were each statistically significant. Differences in the odds of having a hospitalization and receiving post-acute care did not persist after incorporating sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and interaction effects.
Conclusions
Rural- and urban-residing CMC differed in their receipt of health care, and Medicaid coverage, co-occurring disabilities, and community poverty modified several of these effects. These modifying effects should be considered in clinical and policy initiatives to ensure that such initiatives do not widen rural–urban disparities.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.