High Probability of Gene-Drug Interactions Associated with Medication Side Effects in Adolescent Depression: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Pharmacogenetic Testing.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Sara Nooraeen, Paul E Croarkin, Jennifer R Geske, Julia Shekunov, Scott S Orth, Magdalena Romanowicz, Mark A Frye, Jennifer L Vande Voort
{"title":"High Probability of Gene-Drug Interactions Associated with Medication Side Effects in Adolescent Depression: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Pharmacogenetic Testing.","authors":"Sara Nooraeen, Paul E Croarkin, Jennifer R Geske, Julia Shekunov, Scott S Orth, Magdalena Romanowicz, Mark A Frye, Jennifer L Vande Voort","doi":"10.1089/cap.2023.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing panels are widely available in clinical practice and often separate medications into columns/bins associated with low, medium, or high probability of gene-drug interactions. The objective of the Adolescent Management of Depression (AMOD) study was to determine the clinical utility of combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing in a double-blind, randomized, controlled effectiveness study by comparing patients who had genetic testing results at time of medication initiation to those that did not have results until week 8. The objective of this <i>post hoc</i> analysis was to assess and report additional outcomes with respect to significant gene-drug interactions (i.e., a medication in the high probability gene-drug interaction bin as defined by a proprietary algorithm) compared with patients taking a medication with minimal to moderate gene-drug interactions (i.e., a medication from the low or medium probability gene-drug interaction bin, respectively). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Adolescents 13-18 years (<i>N</i> = 170) with moderate to severe major depressive disorder received pharmacogenetic testing. Symptom improvement and side effects were assessed at baseline, week 4, week 8, and 6 months. Patients were grouped into three categories based on whether the medication they were prescribed was associated with low, medium, or high risk for gene-drug interactions. Patients taking a medication from the low/medium gene-drug interaction bin were compared with patients taking a medication from the high gene-drug interaction bin. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients taking a medication from the high gene-drug interaction bin were more likely to endorse side effects compared with patients taking a medication in the low/medium gene-drug interaction bin at week 8 (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and 6 months (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Depressive symptom severity scores did not differ significantly across the medication bins. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study demonstrates the utility of gene-drug interaction testing to guide medication decisions to minimize side effect burden rather than solely prioritizing the search for the most efficacious medication. (Clinical Trials Registration Identifier: NCT02286440).</p>","PeriodicalId":15277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2023.0043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing panels are widely available in clinical practice and often separate medications into columns/bins associated with low, medium, or high probability of gene-drug interactions. The objective of the Adolescent Management of Depression (AMOD) study was to determine the clinical utility of combinatorial pharmacogenetic testing in a double-blind, randomized, controlled effectiveness study by comparing patients who had genetic testing results at time of medication initiation to those that did not have results until week 8. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess and report additional outcomes with respect to significant gene-drug interactions (i.e., a medication in the high probability gene-drug interaction bin as defined by a proprietary algorithm) compared with patients taking a medication with minimal to moderate gene-drug interactions (i.e., a medication from the low or medium probability gene-drug interaction bin, respectively). Methods: Adolescents 13-18 years (N = 170) with moderate to severe major depressive disorder received pharmacogenetic testing. Symptom improvement and side effects were assessed at baseline, week 4, week 8, and 6 months. Patients were grouped into three categories based on whether the medication they were prescribed was associated with low, medium, or high risk for gene-drug interactions. Patients taking a medication from the low/medium gene-drug interaction bin were compared with patients taking a medication from the high gene-drug interaction bin. Results: Patients taking a medication from the high gene-drug interaction bin were more likely to endorse side effects compared with patients taking a medication in the low/medium gene-drug interaction bin at week 8 (p = 0.001) and 6 months (p < 0.0001). Depressive symptom severity scores did not differ significantly across the medication bins. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the utility of gene-drug interaction testing to guide medication decisions to minimize side effect burden rather than solely prioritizing the search for the most efficacious medication. (Clinical Trials Registration Identifier: NCT02286440).

与青少年抑郁症药物副作用相关的基因-药物相互作用的高概率:药物基因检测随机对照试验的结果。
导言:组合药物基因检测面板在临床实践中广泛使用,通常将药物分成与基因-药物相互作用的低概率、中概率或高概率相关的列/箱。青少年抑郁症管理(AMOD)研究的目的是通过比较在开始用药时获得基因检测结果的患者与在用药第 8 周时才获得结果的患者,在一项双盲、随机对照的有效性研究中确定组合药物基因检测的临床效用。这项事后分析的目的是评估并报告与服用基因药物相互作用极小到中等的药物(即分别属于基因药物相互作用低概率或中等概率的药物)的患者相比,基因药物相互作用显著的患者(即根据专有算法定义的基因药物相互作用高概率区的药物)的额外结果。研究方法患有中度至重度重度抑郁症的 13-18 岁青少年(N=170)接受药物基因测试。在基线、第 4 周、第 8 周和 6 个月时对症状改善情况和副作用进行评估。根据患者所服用的药物与基因-药物相互作用的相关风险是低、中还是高,将患者分为三类。将服用低/中基因-药物相互作用药物的患者与服用高基因-药物相互作用药物的患者进行比较。结果显示在第 8 周(p = 0.001)和 6 个月(p 结论:与服用低/中基因-药物相互作用药物的患者相比,服用高基因-药物相互作用药物的患者更有可能认可副作用:这项研究表明,基因与药物相互作用测试可用于指导用药决策,从而最大限度地减轻副作用负担,而不是仅仅优先寻找疗效最好的药物。(临床试验注册标识符:NCT02286440)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (JCAP) is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering the clinical aspects of treating this patient population with psychotropic medications including side effects and interactions, standard doses, and research on new and existing medications. The Journal includes information on related areas of medical sciences such as advances in developmental pharmacokinetics, developmental neuroscience, metabolism, nutrition, molecular genetics, and more. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology coverage includes: New drugs and treatment strategies including the use of psycho-stimulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and atypical antipsychotics New developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, along with other disorders Reports of common and rare Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) including: hyperprolactinemia, galactorrhea, weight gain/loss, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, switching phenomena, sudden death, and the potential increase of suicide. Outcomes research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信