Therapeutic drug monitoring of antifungal therapies: do we really need it and what are the best practices?

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Johannes Boyer, Martin Hoenigl, Lisa Kriegl
{"title":"Therapeutic drug monitoring of antifungal therapies: do we really need it and what are the best practices?","authors":"Johannes Boyer, Martin Hoenigl, Lisa Kriegl","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2024.2317293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advancements, invasive fungal infections (IFI) still carry high mortality rates, often exceeding 30%. The challenges in diagnosis, coupled with limited effective antifungal options, make managing IFIs complex. Antifungal drugs are essential for IFI management, but their efficacy can be diminished by drug-drug interactions and pharmacokinetic variability. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), especially in the context of triazole use, has emerged as a valuable strategy to optimize antifungal therapy.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review provides current evidence regarding the potential benefits of TDM in IFI management. It discusses how TDM can enhance treatment response, safety, and address altered pharmacokinetics in specific patient populations.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>TDM plays a crucial role in achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes in IFI management, particularly for certain antifungal agents. Preclinical studies consistently show a link between therapeutic drug levels and antifungal efficacy. However, clinical research in mycology faces challenges due to patient heterogeneity and the diversity of fungal infections. TDM's potential advantages in guiding Echinocandin therapy for critically ill patients warrant further investigation. Additionally, for drugs like Posaconazole, assessing whether serum levels or alternative markers like saliva offer the best measure of efficacy is an intriguing question.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"309-321"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2317293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite advancements, invasive fungal infections (IFI) still carry high mortality rates, often exceeding 30%. The challenges in diagnosis, coupled with limited effective antifungal options, make managing IFIs complex. Antifungal drugs are essential for IFI management, but their efficacy can be diminished by drug-drug interactions and pharmacokinetic variability. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), especially in the context of triazole use, has emerged as a valuable strategy to optimize antifungal therapy.

Areas covered: This review provides current evidence regarding the potential benefits of TDM in IFI management. It discusses how TDM can enhance treatment response, safety, and address altered pharmacokinetics in specific patient populations.

Expert opinion: TDM plays a crucial role in achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes in IFI management, particularly for certain antifungal agents. Preclinical studies consistently show a link between therapeutic drug levels and antifungal efficacy. However, clinical research in mycology faces challenges due to patient heterogeneity and the diversity of fungal infections. TDM's potential advantages in guiding Echinocandin therapy for critically ill patients warrant further investigation. Additionally, for drugs like Posaconazole, assessing whether serum levels or alternative markers like saliva offer the best measure of efficacy is an intriguing question.

抗真菌疗法的治疗药物监测:我们真的需要吗?
导言:尽管取得了进步,侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)的死亡率仍然很高,通常超过 30%。诊断方面的挑战,加上有效的抗真菌药物有限,使得 IFI 的治疗变得复杂。抗真菌药物对 IFI 的治疗至关重要,但药物间的相互作用和药代动力学变异可能会削弱它们的疗效。治疗药物监测(TDM),尤其是在使用三唑类药物的情况下,已成为优化抗真菌治疗的重要策略:本综述提供了有关 TDM 在 IFI 管理中潜在益处的最新证据。专家观点:TDM在实现抗真菌治疗的目标方面发挥着至关重要的作用:TDM在IFI治疗中实现最佳治疗效果方面发挥着至关重要的作用,尤其是对某些抗真菌药物而言。临床前研究一致表明,治疗药物水平与抗真菌疗效之间存在联系。然而,由于患者的异质性和真菌感染的多样性,真菌学的临床研究面临着挑战。TDM 在指导重症患者进行棘白菌素治疗方面的潜在优势值得进一步研究。此外,对于泊沙康唑等药物,评估血清水平或唾液等替代标记物是否能提供最佳的疗效衡量标准也是一个引人关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信