Comparison of the Fixation Strengths of Screws between the Traditional Trajectory and the Single and Double Endplate Penetrating Screw Trajectories Using Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Models Based on the Finite Element Method.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.31616/asj.2023.0238
Takumi Takeuchi, Yuhei Takamizawa, Kazumasa Konishi, Hideto Sano, Masahito Takahashi, Hitoshi Kouno, Naobumi Hosogane
{"title":"Comparison of the Fixation Strengths of Screws between the Traditional Trajectory and the Single and Double Endplate Penetrating Screw Trajectories Using Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Models Based on the Finite Element Method.","authors":"Takumi Takeuchi, Yuhei Takamizawa, Kazumasa Konishi, Hideto Sano, Masahito Takahashi, Hitoshi Kouno, Naobumi Hosogane","doi":"10.31616/asj.2023.0238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a finite element (FE) study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the fixation strength of traditional trajectory (TT) and single and double endplate penetrating screw trajectories (SEPST/DEPST) to the osteoporotic vertebral body model based on the FE method.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>SEPST/DEPST have been developed to enhance the fixation strength in patients with diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis (DISH). This technique was also applied to patients with osteoporosis. However, determining the superiority of SEPST/ DEPST is difficult because of the heterogeneous patient backgrounds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty vertebrae (T12 and L1) from 10 patients with osteoporosis (two males and eight females; mean age, 74.7 years) were obtained to create the 10 FE models. First, a single screw was placed with TT and SEPST/DEPST, and the fixation strength was compared by axial pullout strength (POS) and multidirectional loading tests. Second, two screws were placed on the bilateral pedicles with TT and SEPST/DEPST, and the fixation force of the vertebrae in the constructs in flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and axial rotation was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SEPST and DEPST had 140% and 171% higher POS values than TT, respectively, and the DEPST result was statistically significant (p =0.007). The multidirectional fixation strength was significantly higher in DEPST and SEPST than in TT in the cranial, caudal, and medial directions (p <0.05) but not in the lateral direction (p =0.05). The vertebral fracture strength at the lower instrumented vertebra of the DEPST tended to be higher than that of TT. The vertebral motion angles in SEPST and DEPST were significantly smaller in lateral bending (p =0.02) and tended to be smaller in flexion and extension than in TT (p =0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study may provide useful information for spine surgeons in deciding whether to choose the SEPS or DEPS technique for augmenting fixation in osteoporotic vertebral fracture surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"12-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2023.0238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: This is a finite element (FE) study.

Purpose: To compare the fixation strength of traditional trajectory (TT) and single and double endplate penetrating screw trajectories (SEPST/DEPST) to the osteoporotic vertebral body model based on the FE method.

Overview of literature: SEPST/DEPST have been developed to enhance the fixation strength in patients with diffuse idiopathic hyperostosis (DISH). This technique was also applied to patients with osteoporosis. However, determining the superiority of SEPST/ DEPST is difficult because of the heterogeneous patient backgrounds.

Methods: Twenty vertebrae (T12 and L1) from 10 patients with osteoporosis (two males and eight females; mean age, 74.7 years) were obtained to create the 10 FE models. First, a single screw was placed with TT and SEPST/DEPST, and the fixation strength was compared by axial pullout strength (POS) and multidirectional loading tests. Second, two screws were placed on the bilateral pedicles with TT and SEPST/DEPST, and the fixation force of the vertebrae in the constructs in flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and axial rotation was examined.

Results: SEPST and DEPST had 140% and 171% higher POS values than TT, respectively, and the DEPST result was statistically significant (p =0.007). The multidirectional fixation strength was significantly higher in DEPST and SEPST than in TT in the cranial, caudal, and medial directions (p <0.05) but not in the lateral direction (p =0.05). The vertebral fracture strength at the lower instrumented vertebra of the DEPST tended to be higher than that of TT. The vertebral motion angles in SEPST and DEPST were significantly smaller in lateral bending (p =0.02) and tended to be smaller in flexion and extension than in TT (p =0.13).

Conclusions: This study may provide useful information for spine surgeons in deciding whether to choose the SEPS or DEPS technique for augmenting fixation in osteoporotic vertebral fracture surgery.

使用基于有限元法的骨质疏松椎体模型,比较传统轨迹与单端板和双端板穿透螺钉轨迹的螺钉固定强度。
研究设计:目的:基于有限元方法,比较传统轨迹(TT)和单、双终板穿入螺钉轨迹(SEPST/DEPST)对骨质疏松椎体模型的固定强度:SEPST/DEPST是为增强弥漫性特发性骨质疏松症(DISH)患者的固定强度而开发的。这种技术也被应用于骨质疏松症患者。然而,由于患者背景各不相同,因此很难确定 SEPST/ DEPST 的优越性:方法:从 10 名骨质疏松症患者(2 男 8 女,平均年龄 74.7 岁)的 20 个椎骨(T12 和 L1)中获取数据,创建 10 个 FE 模型。首先,使用 TT 和 SEPST/DEPST 放置单个螺钉,并通过轴向拉出强度(POS)和多向加载测试比较固定强度。其次,使用 TT 和 SEPST/DEPST 在双侧椎弓根上放置两枚螺钉,并对结构中的椎体在屈曲、伸展、侧屈和轴向旋转时的固定力进行检测:结果:SEPST和DEPST的POS值分别比TT高140%和171%,DEPST的结果具有统计学意义(P =0.007)。DEPST 和 SEPST 在头颅、尾部和内侧方向的多向固定强度明显高于 TT(p 结论:DEPST 和 SEPST 的多向固定强度明显高于 TT:本研究可为脊柱外科医生提供有用信息,帮助他们决定在骨质疏松性椎体骨折手术中选择 SEPS 还是 DEPS 技术进行增强固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信