Implementation and enforcement of mandatory calorie labelling regulations for the out-of-home sector in England: qualitative study of the experiences of business implementers and regulatory enforcers

Michael Essman, Tom Bishop, Thomas Burgoine, Andrew Jones, Megan Polden, Eric Robinson, Stephen J Sharp, Richard Smith, Jean Adams, Martin White
{"title":"Implementation and enforcement of mandatory calorie labelling regulations for the out-of-home sector in England: qualitative study of the experiences of business implementers and regulatory enforcers","authors":"Michael Essman, Tom Bishop, Thomas Burgoine, Andrew Jones, Megan Polden, Eric Robinson, Stephen J Sharp, Richard Smith, Jean Adams, Martin White","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.18.24302990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nMandatory calorie labelling on menus of large out-of-home food outlets was implemented in England on 6 April 2022. Barriers and facilitators that were unforeseen before implementation may modify policy impacts. As part of a process evaluation of the policy, we studied the implementation process, examining business experiences and enforcement by local authorities (LAs) to identify barriers and facilitators in achieving the policy goals. Methods\nUsing purposive sampling, we recruited 11 employees of large food businesses (implementers) and 9 employees of LA environmental health or trading standards departments (enforcers). Post-implementation semi-structured interviews were conducted by video conference. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Method. Results\nBoth groups of participants described a decentralised approach to delivery and enforcement, and resource constraints meant LAs were unable to assist with all business inquiries. Enforcement activity was limited because complaints about labelling from the public were rare, and enforcers prioritized acute food safety issues. Pre-implementation discussions created the presumption among enforcers that most businesses were compliant. Businesses complied to safeguard their reputation and maintain customer trust. While participants supported calorie labelling, potential barriers to policy impact included a presumed lack of customer interest. Financial pressure during implementation strained business resources, and businesses suggested that customers may prioritise financial over health concerns in their decision-making. Conclusions\nThese findings underscore the need for central guidance, verification of adherence, and sufficient enforcement resources. To optimize policy success, future developments should consider economic contexts, customer expectations, and policy refinement, while recognizing common industry arguments against policy implementation.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.18.24302990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Mandatory calorie labelling on menus of large out-of-home food outlets was implemented in England on 6 April 2022. Barriers and facilitators that were unforeseen before implementation may modify policy impacts. As part of a process evaluation of the policy, we studied the implementation process, examining business experiences and enforcement by local authorities (LAs) to identify barriers and facilitators in achieving the policy goals. Methods Using purposive sampling, we recruited 11 employees of large food businesses (implementers) and 9 employees of LA environmental health or trading standards departments (enforcers). Post-implementation semi-structured interviews were conducted by video conference. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Method. Results Both groups of participants described a decentralised approach to delivery and enforcement, and resource constraints meant LAs were unable to assist with all business inquiries. Enforcement activity was limited because complaints about labelling from the public were rare, and enforcers prioritized acute food safety issues. Pre-implementation discussions created the presumption among enforcers that most businesses were compliant. Businesses complied to safeguard their reputation and maintain customer trust. While participants supported calorie labelling, potential barriers to policy impact included a presumed lack of customer interest. Financial pressure during implementation strained business resources, and businesses suggested that customers may prioritise financial over health concerns in their decision-making. Conclusions These findings underscore the need for central guidance, verification of adherence, and sufficient enforcement resources. To optimize policy success, future developments should consider economic contexts, customer expectations, and policy refinement, while recognizing common industry arguments against policy implementation.
英格兰家庭外食品行业强制性卡路里标签法规的实施和执行:对企业实施者和法规执行者经验的定性研究
背景英国于 2022 年 4 月 6 日开始在大型户外食品店的菜单上强制标注卡路里。实施前无法预见的障碍和促进因素可能会改变政策的影响。作为政策过程评估的一部分,我们研究了政策的实施过程,考察了企业的经验和地方当局(LA)的执行情况,以确定实现政策目标的障碍和促进因素。方法通过有目的的抽样,我们招募了 11 名大型食品企业的员工(实施者)和 9 名地方政府环境卫生或贸易标准部门的员工(执行者)。实施后的半结构式访谈通过视频会议进行。对访谈进行了录音、逐字记录,并采用框架法进行了分析。结果两组参与者都描述了分散提供和执法的方法,资源的限制意味着地方当局无法协助处理所有的商业咨询。执法活动有限,因为公众对标签的投诉很少,执法人员优先处理的是严重的食品安全问题。在实施前的讨论中,执法人员认为大多数企业都遵守了规定。企业遵守规定是为了维护自己的声誉,保持顾客的信任。虽然参与者支持热量标签,但政策影响的潜在障碍包括假定顾客缺乏兴趣。实施过程中的经济压力使企业资源紧张,企业认为顾客在做决定时可能会优先考虑经济问题,而不是健康问题。结论这些发现强调了中央指导、遵守情况核查和充足的执行资源的必要性。为使政策取得最大成功,未来的发展应考虑经济背景、客户期望和政策完善,同时认识到反对政策实施的常见行业论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信