Domination, Resistance, and Trade: The Portuguese, Oman, and Kanara on the Indian Ocean

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Nagendra Rao
{"title":"Domination, Resistance, and Trade: The Portuguese, Oman, and Kanara on the Indian Ocean","authors":"Nagendra Rao","doi":"10.1163/22879811-bja10041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Did the Portuguese always dominate the Asian powers in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries? Colonial historians used to be confident that the West consistently dominated the East, with that domination culminating in the conquest of Asia. This paper argues that the Europeans faced significant resistance from the eastern powers, with the three-way relationship of Portugal, Kanara, and Oman examined as a case in point. The countries’ dealings with each other date to the region’s Age of Partnership, when no single power could dominate the other. In the sixteenth century, the Portuguese obtained the upper hand over the East, particularly Kanara and Oman. But in the seventeenth century, the Portuguese lost their upper hand and the Asian powers staged a resurgence. The Omanis, indeed, imitated the Portuguese by establishing factories in India. This article draws on sources such as Filmotheca Ultramarina Portuguesa, Assentos Conselho do Estado, Cartas, Patentes e Alvaras, and Documentos Remittodos India.</p>","PeriodicalId":41200,"journal":{"name":"Asian Review of World Histories","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Review of World Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22879811-bja10041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Did the Portuguese always dominate the Asian powers in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries? Colonial historians used to be confident that the West consistently dominated the East, with that domination culminating in the conquest of Asia. This paper argues that the Europeans faced significant resistance from the eastern powers, with the three-way relationship of Portugal, Kanara, and Oman examined as a case in point. The countries’ dealings with each other date to the region’s Age of Partnership, when no single power could dominate the other. In the sixteenth century, the Portuguese obtained the upper hand over the East, particularly Kanara and Oman. But in the seventeenth century, the Portuguese lost their upper hand and the Asian powers staged a resurgence. The Omanis, indeed, imitated the Portuguese by establishing factories in India. This article draws on sources such as Filmotheca Ultramarina Portuguesa, Assentos Conselho do Estado, Cartas, Patentes e Alvaras, and Documentos Remittodos India.

统治、抵抗与贸易:印度洋上的葡萄牙人、阿曼和卡纳拉
葡萄牙人在十六和十七世纪是否一直统治着亚洲列强?殖民史学家曾经自信地认为,西方始终统治着东方,并最终征服了亚洲。本文认为,欧洲人面临着来自东方大国的巨大阻力,葡萄牙、卡纳拉和阿曼的三方关系就是一个典型的例子。这些国家之间的交往可以追溯到该地区的 "伙伴关系时代"(Age of Partnership),当时没有任何一个强国可以主宰另一个强国。十六世纪,葡萄牙在东方,尤其是卡纳拉和阿曼占据上风。但在十七世纪,葡萄牙人失去了优势,亚洲列强卷土重来。阿曼人模仿葡萄牙人,在印度建立了工厂。本文参考了以下资料:Filmotheca Ultramarina Portuguesa、Assentos Conselho do Estado、Cartas、Patentes e Alvaras 和 Documentos Remittodos India。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信