{"title":"Domination, Resistance, and Trade: The Portuguese, Oman, and Kanara on the Indian Ocean","authors":"Nagendra Rao","doi":"10.1163/22879811-bja10041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Did the Portuguese always dominate the Asian powers in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries? Colonial historians used to be confident that the West consistently dominated the East, with that domination culminating in the conquest of Asia. This paper argues that the Europeans faced significant resistance from the eastern powers, with the three-way relationship of Portugal, Kanara, and Oman examined as a case in point. The countries’ dealings with each other date to the region’s Age of Partnership, when no single power could dominate the other. In the sixteenth century, the Portuguese obtained the upper hand over the East, particularly Kanara and Oman. But in the seventeenth century, the Portuguese lost their upper hand and the Asian powers staged a resurgence. The Omanis, indeed, imitated the Portuguese by establishing factories in India. This article draws on sources such as Filmotheca Ultramarina Portuguesa, Assentos Conselho do Estado, Cartas, Patentes e Alvaras, and Documentos Remittodos India.</p>","PeriodicalId":41200,"journal":{"name":"Asian Review of World Histories","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Review of World Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22879811-bja10041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Did the Portuguese always dominate the Asian powers in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries? Colonial historians used to be confident that the West consistently dominated the East, with that domination culminating in the conquest of Asia. This paper argues that the Europeans faced significant resistance from the eastern powers, with the three-way relationship of Portugal, Kanara, and Oman examined as a case in point. The countries’ dealings with each other date to the region’s Age of Partnership, when no single power could dominate the other. In the sixteenth century, the Portuguese obtained the upper hand over the East, particularly Kanara and Oman. But in the seventeenth century, the Portuguese lost their upper hand and the Asian powers staged a resurgence. The Omanis, indeed, imitated the Portuguese by establishing factories in India. This article draws on sources such as Filmotheca Ultramarina Portuguesa, Assentos Conselho do Estado, Cartas, Patentes e Alvaras, and Documentos Remittodos India.
葡萄牙人在十六和十七世纪是否一直统治着亚洲列强?殖民史学家曾经自信地认为,西方始终统治着东方,并最终征服了亚洲。本文认为,欧洲人面临着来自东方大国的巨大阻力,葡萄牙、卡纳拉和阿曼的三方关系就是一个典型的例子。这些国家之间的交往可以追溯到该地区的 "伙伴关系时代"(Age of Partnership),当时没有任何一个强国可以主宰另一个强国。十六世纪,葡萄牙在东方,尤其是卡纳拉和阿曼占据上风。但在十七世纪,葡萄牙人失去了优势,亚洲列强卷土重来。阿曼人模仿葡萄牙人,在印度建立了工厂。本文参考了以下资料:Filmotheca Ultramarina Portuguesa、Assentos Conselho do Estado、Cartas、Patentes e Alvaras 和 Documentos Remittodos India。