Sacroiliac joint dysfunction and lumbar pain. Evaluation in a Brazilian population.

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2023-07-01
B C P Lopes, G Rocha-Lauretti, H L A Defino, C S Oliveira, T S Serra, K K Ogata, C Trindade
{"title":"Sacroiliac joint dysfunction and lumbar pain. Evaluation in a Brazilian population.","authors":"B C P Lopes, G Rocha-Lauretti, H L A Defino, C S Oliveira, T S Serra, K K Ogata, C Trindade","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study intended to evaluate the incidence and evolution of sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD). To reach 50 patients with SIJD diagnosis, 192 patients with low back pain and failure in conservative approach were consecutively examined (26% incidence). Initially patients underwent intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid sacroiliac joint (SIJ) block followed, if necessary, by cooled SIJ radiofrequency or referred to surgical intervention, in order of complexity. From the 50 patients submitted to IA SI block, 41 (82%) referred pain and quality of life improvement and lesser rescue analgesics consumption for 25 weeks. The block induced a prompt onset of pain relief and there was a drop in mean pain score from 8 to 2 cm (p < 0.001) maintained up to 25 weeks. Rescue analgesic consumption also significantly dropped (p < 0.05). However, nine patients (18%) did not refer long lasting improvement in the third week evaluation and underwent cooled radiofrequency. From this population of nine, seven were successful (78%) while two were recommended surgery. In view of the 50 patients, 82% were comfortable after IA block, 18% were submitted to radiofrequency, with a success rate of 78%. The final incidence of surgery suggestion was 4%.</p>","PeriodicalId":101296,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"37 4","pages":"227-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study intended to evaluate the incidence and evolution of sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD). To reach 50 patients with SIJD diagnosis, 192 patients with low back pain and failure in conservative approach were consecutively examined (26% incidence). Initially patients underwent intra-articular (IA) corticosteroid sacroiliac joint (SIJ) block followed, if necessary, by cooled SIJ radiofrequency or referred to surgical intervention, in order of complexity. From the 50 patients submitted to IA SI block, 41 (82%) referred pain and quality of life improvement and lesser rescue analgesics consumption for 25 weeks. The block induced a prompt onset of pain relief and there was a drop in mean pain score from 8 to 2 cm (p < 0.001) maintained up to 25 weeks. Rescue analgesic consumption also significantly dropped (p < 0.05). However, nine patients (18%) did not refer long lasting improvement in the third week evaluation and underwent cooled radiofrequency. From this population of nine, seven were successful (78%) while two were recommended surgery. In view of the 50 patients, 82% were comfortable after IA block, 18% were submitted to radiofrequency, with a success rate of 78%. The final incidence of surgery suggestion was 4%.

骶髂关节功能障碍与腰痛。在巴西人群中进行评估。
该研究旨在评估骶髂关节功能障碍(SIJD)的发病率和演变情况。为了找到50名确诊为骶髂关节功能障碍的患者,研究人员连续检查了192名腰痛且保守治疗失败的患者(发生率为26%)。患者最初接受了关节内皮质类固醇骶髂关节(SIJ)阻滞治疗,必要时接受骶髂关节冷却射频治疗,或按照复杂程度依次接受手术治疗。在接受髂胫关节腔内阻滞治疗的 50 名患者中,有 41 人(82%)的疼痛和生活质量得到改善,并且在 25 周内减少了止痛药的用量。阻滞能迅速缓解疼痛,平均疼痛评分从 8 厘米降至 2 厘米(p < 0.001),并持续了 25 周。解救镇痛药的用量也显著下降(p < 0.05)。然而,有九名患者(18%)在第三周的评估中未提及长期持续的改善,并接受了冷却射频治疗。在这 9 名患者中,有 7 人(78%)成功接受了治疗,2 人被建议接受手术治疗。在 50 名患者中,82% 的患者在 IA 阻滞后感觉舒适,18% 的患者接受了射频治疗,成功率为 78%。最终建议手术的比例为 4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信