How Do Patients and Otolaryngologists Define Dizziness?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Brianna L Murphy, Jakob L Fischer, Anthony M Tolisano, Alvaro I Navarro, Lily Trinh, Waleed M Abuzeid, Ian M Humphreys, Nadeem A Akbar, Sharan Shah, John S Schneider, Charles A Riley, Edward D McCoul
{"title":"How Do Patients and Otolaryngologists Define Dizziness?","authors":"Brianna L Murphy, Jakob L Fischer, Anthony M Tolisano, Alvaro I Navarro, Lily Trinh, Waleed M Abuzeid, Ian M Humphreys, Nadeem A Akbar, Sharan Shah, John S Schneider, Charles A Riley, Edward D McCoul","doi":"10.1177/00034894241233949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess for differences in how patients and otolaryngologists define the term dizziness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between June 2020 and December 2022, otolaryngology clinicians and consecutive patients at 5 academic otolaryngology institutions across the United States were asked to define the term \"dizziness\" by completing a semantics-based questionnaire containing 20 common descriptors of the term within 5 symptom domains (imbalance-related, lightheadedness-related, motion-related, vision-related, and pain-related). The primary outcome was differences between patient and clinician perceptions of dizzy-related symptoms. Secondary outcomes included differences among patient populations by geographic location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were obtained from 271 patients and 31 otolaryngologists. Patients and otolaryngologists selected 7.7 ± 3.5 and 7.1 ± 4.3 symptoms, respectively. Most patients (266, 98.2%) selected from more than 1 domain and 17 (6.3%) patients identified symptoms from all 5 domains. Patients and clinicians were equally likely to define dizziness using terms from the imbalance (difference, -2.3%; 95% CI, -13.2%, 8.6%), lightheadedness (-14.1%; -29.2%, 1.0%), and motion-related (9.4; -0.3, 19.1) domains. Patients were more likely to include terms from the vision-related (23.6%; 10.5, 36.8) and pain-related (18.2%; 10.3%, 26.1%) domains. There were minor variations in how patients defined dizziness based on geographic location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients and otolaryngologists commonly described dizziness using symptoms related to imbalance, lightheadedness, and motion. Patients were more likely to use vision or pain-related terms. Understanding of these semantic differences may enable more effective patient-clinician communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241233949","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess for differences in how patients and otolaryngologists define the term dizziness.

Methods: Between June 2020 and December 2022, otolaryngology clinicians and consecutive patients at 5 academic otolaryngology institutions across the United States were asked to define the term "dizziness" by completing a semantics-based questionnaire containing 20 common descriptors of the term within 5 symptom domains (imbalance-related, lightheadedness-related, motion-related, vision-related, and pain-related). The primary outcome was differences between patient and clinician perceptions of dizzy-related symptoms. Secondary outcomes included differences among patient populations by geographic location.

Results: Responses were obtained from 271 patients and 31 otolaryngologists. Patients and otolaryngologists selected 7.7 ± 3.5 and 7.1 ± 4.3 symptoms, respectively. Most patients (266, 98.2%) selected from more than 1 domain and 17 (6.3%) patients identified symptoms from all 5 domains. Patients and clinicians were equally likely to define dizziness using terms from the imbalance (difference, -2.3%; 95% CI, -13.2%, 8.6%), lightheadedness (-14.1%; -29.2%, 1.0%), and motion-related (9.4; -0.3, 19.1) domains. Patients were more likely to include terms from the vision-related (23.6%; 10.5, 36.8) and pain-related (18.2%; 10.3%, 26.1%) domains. There were minor variations in how patients defined dizziness based on geographic location.

Conclusions: Patients and otolaryngologists commonly described dizziness using symptoms related to imbalance, lightheadedness, and motion. Patients were more likely to use vision or pain-related terms. Understanding of these semantic differences may enable more effective patient-clinician communication.

患者和耳鼻喉科医生如何定义头晕?
目的:评估患者和耳鼻喉科医生对头晕一词定义的差异:评估患者和耳鼻喉科医生对 "头晕 "一词定义的差异:在 2020 年 6 月至 2022 年 12 月期间,要求美国 5 家耳鼻喉科学术机构的耳鼻喉科临床医生和连续患者填写一份基于语义学的问卷,其中包含 5 个症状领域(失衡相关、头晕相关、运动相关、视力相关和疼痛相关)内 20 个常见描述词,以此来定义 "头晕 "一词。主要结果是患者和临床医生对头晕相关症状的认知差异。次要结果包括不同地理位置的患者群体之间的差异:共收到 271 名患者和 31 名耳鼻喉科医生的回复。患者和耳鼻喉科医生分别选择了 7.7 ± 3.5 和 7.1 ± 4.3 个症状。大多数患者(266 人,98.2%)选择了一个以上的领域,17 名患者(6.3%)确定了所有 5 个领域的症状。患者和临床医生使用不平衡(差异为-2.3%;95% CI为-13.2%,8.6%)、头晕(-14.1%;-29.2%,1.0%)和运动相关(9.4;-0.3,19.1)领域的术语定义头晕的可能性相同。患者更倾向于使用与视力相关(23.6%;10.5%,36.8%)和与疼痛相关(18.2%;10.3%,26.1%)的术语。不同地理位置的患者对头晕的定义略有不同:患者和耳鼻喉科医生通常使用与失衡、头晕和运动相关的症状来描述头晕。患者更倾向于使用与视觉或疼痛相关的术语。了解这些语义差异可使患者与医生之间的交流更加有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信