The Revo-i Robotic Surgical System in Advanced Pancreatic Surgery: A Second Non-Randomized Clinical Trial and Comparative Analysis to the da Vinci™ System.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ji Su Kim, Munseok Choi, Hyeo Seong Hwang, Woo Jung Lee, Chang Moo Kang
{"title":"The Revo-i Robotic Surgical System in Advanced Pancreatic Surgery: A Second Non-Randomized Clinical Trial and Comparative Analysis to the da Vinci™ System.","authors":"Ji Su Kim, Munseok Choi, Hyeo Seong Hwang, Woo Jung Lee, Chang Moo Kang","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2023.0140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Numerous robot-assisted pancreatic surgery are being performed worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Revo-i robot system (Meerecompany, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for advanced pancreatic surgery, and also compare this new system with the existing da Vinci™ robot system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in the context of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a one-armed prospective clinical trial that assessed the Revo-i robot system for advanced pancreatic surgery. Ten patients aged 30 to 73 years were enrolled between December 2019 and August 2020. Postoperative outcomes were retrospectively compared with those of the da Vinci™ surgical system. From March 2017 to August 2020, a total of 47 patients who underwent RPD were analyzed retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the prospective clinical trial, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in nine patients and one patient underwent central pancreatectomy. Among the 10 study participants, the incidence of major complications was 0% in hospital stay. There were eight postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) biochemical leaks (80%). In the retrospective analysis that compared the Revo-i and da Vinci™ robotic systems, 10 patients underwent Revo-i RPD and 37 patients underwent da Vinci™ RPD, with no significant differences in complication or POPF incidence rates between the two groups (<i>p</i>=0.695, <i>p</i>=0.317).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-arm prospective study with short-term follow-up at a single institution, the Revo-i robotic surgical system was safe and effective for advanced pancreatic surgery. Revo-i RPD is comparable to the da Vinci™ RPD and is expected to have wide clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"65 3","pages":"148-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0140","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Numerous robot-assisted pancreatic surgery are being performed worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Revo-i robot system (Meerecompany, Seoul, Republic of Korea) for advanced pancreatic surgery, and also compare this new system with the existing da Vinci™ robot system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in the context of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD).

Materials and methods: This study was a one-armed prospective clinical trial that assessed the Revo-i robot system for advanced pancreatic surgery. Ten patients aged 30 to 73 years were enrolled between December 2019 and August 2020. Postoperative outcomes were retrospectively compared with those of the da Vinci™ surgical system. From March 2017 to August 2020, a total of 47 patients who underwent RPD were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: In the prospective clinical trial, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in nine patients and one patient underwent central pancreatectomy. Among the 10 study participants, the incidence of major complications was 0% in hospital stay. There were eight postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) biochemical leaks (80%). In the retrospective analysis that compared the Revo-i and da Vinci™ robotic systems, 10 patients underwent Revo-i RPD and 37 patients underwent da Vinci™ RPD, with no significant differences in complication or POPF incidence rates between the two groups (p=0.695, p=0.317).

Conclusion: In this single-arm prospective study with short-term follow-up at a single institution, the Revo-i robotic surgical system was safe and effective for advanced pancreatic surgery. Revo-i RPD is comparable to the da Vinci™ RPD and is expected to have wide clinical application.

Revo-i机器人手术系统在晚期胰腺手术中的应用:第二次非随机临床试验及与达芬奇™系统的比较分析。
目的:全球正在进行大量机器人辅助胰腺手术。本研究旨在评估 Revo-i 机器人系统(Meerecompany,韩国首尔)用于高级胰腺手术的可行性和安全性,并在机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术(RPD)中将这一新系统与现有的达芬奇™机器人系统(Intuitive Surgical,美国加利福尼亚州桑尼维尔)进行比较:本研究是一项单臂前瞻性临床试验,评估了 Revo-i 机器人系统在晚期胰腺手术中的应用。10 名患者于 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 8 月间入组,年龄在 30 岁至 73 岁之间。术后结果与达芬奇™手术系统进行了回顾性比较。2017年3月至2020年8月,共对47名接受RPD的患者进行了回顾性分析:在前瞻性临床试验中,9 名患者进行了胰十二指肠切除术,1 名患者进行了中央胰腺切除术。在 10 名参与者中,住院期间主要并发症的发生率为 0%。术后胰瘘(POPF)生化渗漏有 8 例(80%)。在比较Revo-i和达芬奇™机器人系统的回顾性分析中,10名患者接受了Revo-i RPD,37名患者接受了达芬奇™RPD,两组患者的并发症或POPF发生率无显著差异(P=0.695,P=0.317):结论:在这项由一家医疗机构进行的单臂前瞻性短期随访研究中,Revo-i 机器人手术系统对晚期胰腺手术安全有效。Revo-i RPD可与达芬奇™ RPD媲美,有望广泛应用于临床。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信