Computed Tomography Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of Spread Through Air Spaces in the Early Stage of Surgically Resected Lung Adenocarcinomas.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Young Joo Suh, Kyunghwa Han, Yonghan Kwon, Hwiyoung Kim, Suji Lee, Sung Ho Hwang, Myung Hyun Kim, Hyun Joo Shin, Chang Young Lee, Hyo Sup Shim
{"title":"Computed Tomography Radiomics for Preoperative Prediction of Spread Through Air Spaces in the Early Stage of Surgically Resected Lung Adenocarcinomas.","authors":"Young Joo Suh, Kyunghwa Han, Yonghan Kwon, Hwiyoung Kim, Suji Lee, Sung Ho Hwang, Myung Hyun Kim, Hyun Joo Shin, Chang Young Lee, Hyo Sup Shim","doi":"10.3349/ymj.2023.0368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the added value of radiomics models from preoperative chest CT in predicting the presence of spread through air spaces (STAS) in the early stage of surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas using multiple validation datasets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 550 early-stage surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas in 521 patients, classified into training, test, internal validation, and temporal validation sets (n=211, 90, 91, and 158, respectively). Radiomics features were extracted from the segmented tumors on preoperative chest CT, and a radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated to predict the presence of STAS. Diagnostic performance of the conventional model and the combined model, based on a combination of conventional and radiomics features, for the diagnosis of the presence of STAS were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rad-score was significantly higher in the STAS-positive group compared to the STAS-negative group in the training, test, internal, and temporal validation sets. The performance of the combined model was significantly higher than that of the conventional model in the training set {AUC: 0.784 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.722-0.846] vs. AUC: 0.815 (95% CI: 0.759-0.872), <i>p</i>=0.042}. In the temporal validation set, the combined model showed a significantly higher AUC than that of the conventional model (<i>p</i>=0.001). The combined model showed a higher AUC than the conventional model in the test and internal validation sets, albeit with no statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A quantitative CT radiomics model can assist in the non-invasive prediction of the presence of STAS in the early stage of lung adenocarcinomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":23765,"journal":{"name":"Yonsei Medical Journal","volume":"65 3","pages":"163-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonsei Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2023.0368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the added value of radiomics models from preoperative chest CT in predicting the presence of spread through air spaces (STAS) in the early stage of surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas using multiple validation datasets.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 550 early-stage surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas in 521 patients, classified into training, test, internal validation, and temporal validation sets (n=211, 90, 91, and 158, respectively). Radiomics features were extracted from the segmented tumors on preoperative chest CT, and a radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated to predict the presence of STAS. Diagnostic performance of the conventional model and the combined model, based on a combination of conventional and radiomics features, for the diagnosis of the presence of STAS were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results: Rad-score was significantly higher in the STAS-positive group compared to the STAS-negative group in the training, test, internal, and temporal validation sets. The performance of the combined model was significantly higher than that of the conventional model in the training set {AUC: 0.784 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.722-0.846] vs. AUC: 0.815 (95% CI: 0.759-0.872), p=0.042}. In the temporal validation set, the combined model showed a significantly higher AUC than that of the conventional model (p=0.001). The combined model showed a higher AUC than the conventional model in the test and internal validation sets, albeit with no statistical significance.

Conclusion: A quantitative CT radiomics model can assist in the non-invasive prediction of the presence of STAS in the early stage of lung adenocarcinomas.

计算机断层扫描放射组学用于术前预测手术切除肺腺癌早期的气隙扩散情况
目的:使用多个验证数据集评估术前胸部 CT 的放射组学模型在预测早期手术切除的肺腺癌是否存在通过气隙扩散(STAS)方面的附加价值:这项回顾性研究包括521名患者的550个早期手术切除肺腺癌,分为训练集、测试集、内部验证集和时间验证集(分别为211、90、91和158)。从术前胸部 CT 上分割的肿瘤中提取放射组学特征,并计算放射组学评分(Rad-score),以预测是否存在 STAS。使用接收者操作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)比较了传统模型和基于传统特征和放射组学特征的组合模型在诊断是否存在 STAS 方面的诊断性能:在训练集、测试集、内部集和时间验证集中,STAS 阳性组的 Rad 评分明显高于 STAS 阴性组。在训练集中,组合模型的性能明显高于传统模型{AUC:0.784 [95% 置信区间 (CI): 0.722-0.846] vs. AUC:0.815(95% 置信区间:0.759-0.872),p=0.042}。在时间验证集中,组合模型的 AUC 明显高于传统模型(p=0.001)。在测试集和内部验证集中,组合模型的AUC高于传统模型,尽管没有统计学意义:结论:CT放射组学定量模型有助于无创预测肺腺癌早期是否存在STAS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonsei Medical Journal
Yonsei Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Yonsei Medical Journal (YMJ) is to publish high quality manuscripts dedicated to clinical or basic research. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, case reports, brief communications, and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信