Prevalence of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions among dental visits, 2019.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1017/ice.2024.13
Ashlee M Murphy, Ursula C Patel, Geneva M Wilson, Katie J Suda
{"title":"Prevalence of unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions among dental visits, 2019.","authors":"Ashlee M Murphy, Ursula C Patel, Geneva M Wilson, Katie J Suda","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The US National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria established a goal to decrease unnecessary outpatient antibiotic use by 50%. However, data to inform this goal have been limited to medical settings and have not included dental prescribing. Thus, we sought to identify the proportion of antibiotics prescribed inappropriately by dentists to inform outpatient stewardship efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of 2019 Veterans' Affairs (VA) national electronic health record data. Antibiotics prescribed by dentists were evaluated for appropriateness based on 2 definitions: one derived from current guidelines (consensus-based recommendations) and the other based on relevant clinical literature (nonconsensus). A clustered binomial logistic regression model determined factors associated with discordant prescribing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 92,224 antibiotic prescriptions (63% amoxicillin; mean supply, 8.0 days) were associated with 88,539 dental visits. Prophylaxis for complications in medically compromised patients was associated with the most (30.9%) antibiotic prescriptions, followed by prevention of postsurgical complications (20.1%) and infective endocarditis (18.0%). At the visit level, 15,476 (17.5%) met the consensus-based definition for appropriate antibiotic usage and 56,946 (64.3%) met the nonconsensus definition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More than half of antibiotics prescribed by dentists do not have guidelines supporting their use. Regardless of definition applied, antibiotics prescribed by dentists were commonly unnecessary. Improving prescribing by dentists is critical to reach the national goal to decrease unnecessary antibiotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The US National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria established a goal to decrease unnecessary outpatient antibiotic use by 50%. However, data to inform this goal have been limited to medical settings and have not included dental prescribing. Thus, we sought to identify the proportion of antibiotics prescribed inappropriately by dentists to inform outpatient stewardship efforts.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 2019 Veterans' Affairs (VA) national electronic health record data. Antibiotics prescribed by dentists were evaluated for appropriateness based on 2 definitions: one derived from current guidelines (consensus-based recommendations) and the other based on relevant clinical literature (nonconsensus). A clustered binomial logistic regression model determined factors associated with discordant prescribing.

Results: In total, 92,224 antibiotic prescriptions (63% amoxicillin; mean supply, 8.0 days) were associated with 88,539 dental visits. Prophylaxis for complications in medically compromised patients was associated with the most (30.9%) antibiotic prescriptions, followed by prevention of postsurgical complications (20.1%) and infective endocarditis (18.0%). At the visit level, 15,476 (17.5%) met the consensus-based definition for appropriate antibiotic usage and 56,946 (64.3%) met the nonconsensus definition.

Conclusions: More than half of antibiotics prescribed by dentists do not have guidelines supporting their use. Regardless of definition applied, antibiotics prescribed by dentists were commonly unnecessary. Improving prescribing by dentists is critical to reach the national goal to decrease unnecessary antibiotic use.

2019年牙科就诊中不必要抗生素处方的流行率。
目标:美国《抗生素耐药菌国家行动计划》确立了将不必要的门诊抗生素使用量减少 50%的目标。然而,为实现这一目标而提供的数据仅限于医疗机构,并不包括牙科处方。因此,我们试图确定牙科医生开出不当抗生素处方的比例,为门诊病人监管工作提供参考:方法:对2019年退伍军人事务部(VA)全国电子健康记录数据进行横断面分析。根据两种定义对牙医开具的抗生素进行适当性评估:一种定义源自现行指南(基于共识的建议),另一种定义基于相关临床文献(非共识)。聚类二项逻辑回归模型确定了与不一致处方相关的因素:共有 92,224 份抗生素处方(63% 为阿莫西林;平均用药量为 8.0 天)与 88,539 次牙科就诊有关。与最多抗生素处方(30.9%)相关的是对病情危重患者并发症的预防,其次是预防手术后并发症(20.1%)和感染性心内膜炎(18.0%)。在就诊层面,15,476 人(17.5%)符合基于共识的抗生素合理使用定义,56,946 人(64.3%)符合非共识定义:结论:牙医开出的抗生素处方中有一半以上没有支持其使用的指南。无论采用哪种定义,牙医处方的抗生素通常都是不必要的。要实现减少不必要抗生素使用的国家目标,改善牙医处方至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信