In vitro collagen biomarkers in mechanically stimulated human tendon cells: a systematic review.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Connective Tissue Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1080/03008207.2024.2313582
Kipling Squier, Rouhollah Mousavizadeh, Faraz Damji, Charlotte Beck, Michael Hunt, Alexander Scott
{"title":"In vitro collagen biomarkers in mechanically stimulated human tendon cells: a systematic review.","authors":"Kipling Squier, Rouhollah Mousavizadeh, Faraz Damji, Charlotte Beck, Michael Hunt, Alexander Scott","doi":"10.1080/03008207.2024.2313582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to comprehensively examine and summarize the available in vitro evidence regarding the relationship between mechanical stimulation and biomarkers of collagen synthesis in human-derived tendon cells.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review with narrative analyses and risk of bias assessment guided by the Health Assessment and Translation tool. The electronic databases MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CENTRAL (Ovid) and COMPENDEX (Engineering Village) were systematically searched from inception to 3 August 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed English language, original experimental, or quasi-experimental in vitro publications that subjected human tendon cells to mechanical stimulation, with collagen synthesis (total collagen, type I, III, V, XI, XII, and XIV) and related biomarkers (matrix metalloproteinases, transforming growth factor β, scleraxis, basic fibroblast growth factor) as outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one publications were included. A pervasive definite high risk of bias was evident in all included studies. Owing to incomplete outcome reporting and heterogeneity in mechanical stimulation protocols, planned meta-analyses were unfeasible. Reviewed data suggested that human tendon cells respond to mechanical stimulation with increased synthesis of collagen (e.g., COL1A1, procollagen, total soluble collagen, etc.), scleraxis and several matrix metalloproteinases. Results also indicate that mechanical stimulation dose magnitude may influence synthesis in several biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A limited number of studies, unfortunately characterized by a definite high risk of bias, suggest that in vitro mechanical stimulation primarily increases type I collagen synthesis by human tendon cells. Findings from this systematic review provide researchers and clinicians with biological evidence concerning the possible beneficial influence of exercise and loading on cellular-level tendon adaptation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10661,"journal":{"name":"Connective Tissue Research","volume":" ","pages":"89-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connective Tissue Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03008207.2024.2313582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to comprehensively examine and summarize the available in vitro evidence regarding the relationship between mechanical stimulation and biomarkers of collagen synthesis in human-derived tendon cells.

Methods: Systematic review with narrative analyses and risk of bias assessment guided by the Health Assessment and Translation tool. The electronic databases MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CENTRAL (Ovid) and COMPENDEX (Engineering Village) were systematically searched from inception to 3 August 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed English language, original experimental, or quasi-experimental in vitro publications that subjected human tendon cells to mechanical stimulation, with collagen synthesis (total collagen, type I, III, V, XI, XII, and XIV) and related biomarkers (matrix metalloproteinases, transforming growth factor β, scleraxis, basic fibroblast growth factor) as outcomes.

Results: Twenty-one publications were included. A pervasive definite high risk of bias was evident in all included studies. Owing to incomplete outcome reporting and heterogeneity in mechanical stimulation protocols, planned meta-analyses were unfeasible. Reviewed data suggested that human tendon cells respond to mechanical stimulation with increased synthesis of collagen (e.g., COL1A1, procollagen, total soluble collagen, etc.), scleraxis and several matrix metalloproteinases. Results also indicate that mechanical stimulation dose magnitude may influence synthesis in several biomarkers.

Conclusions: A limited number of studies, unfortunately characterized by a definite high risk of bias, suggest that in vitro mechanical stimulation primarily increases type I collagen synthesis by human tendon cells. Findings from this systematic review provide researchers and clinicians with biological evidence concerning the possible beneficial influence of exercise and loading on cellular-level tendon adaptation.

机械刺激人体肌腱细胞中的体外胶原蛋白生物标志物:系统综述。
研究目的本研究旨在全面检查和总结有关机械刺激与人源肌腱细胞胶原合成生物标志物之间关系的现有体外证据:方法:在健康评估与转化工具的指导下,通过叙述性分析和偏倚风险评估进行系统综述。系统检索了MEDLINE(Ovid)、EMBASE(Ovid)、CENTRAL(Ovid)和COMPENDEX(Engineering Village)等电子数据库,检索时间从开始至2023年8月3日。纳入标准包括英文、原始实验或准实验体外出版物,这些出版物将人肌腱细胞置于机械刺激下,以胶原蛋白合成(总胶原蛋白、I型、III型、V型、XI型、XII型和XIV型)和相关生物标志物(基质金属蛋白酶、转化生长因子β、硬化、碱性成纤维细胞生长因子)作为结果:结果:共纳入 21 篇论文。所有纳入的研究均存在明显的高偏倚风险。由于结果报告不完整以及机械刺激方案的异质性,计划中的荟萃分析并不可行。综述数据表明,人体肌腱细胞对机械刺激的反应是胶原蛋白(如 COL1A1、胶原蛋白原、可溶性胶原蛋白总量等)、硬蛋白和几种基质金属蛋白酶的合成增加。结果还表明,机械刺激的剂量大小可能会影响几种生物标志物的合成:有限的研究表明,体外机械刺激主要会增加人体肌腱细胞 I 型胶原蛋白的合成,但遗憾的是,这些研究存在一定的高偏倚风险。本系统综述的研究结果为研究人员和临床医生提供了有关运动和负荷可能对细胞级肌腱适应性产生有益影响的生物学证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Connective Tissue Research
Connective Tissue Research 生物-细胞生物学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
37
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Connective Tissue Research is to present original and significant research in all basic areas of connective tissue and matrix biology. The journal also provides topical reviews and, on occasion, the proceedings of conferences in areas of special interest at which original work is presented. The journal supports an interdisciplinary approach; we present a variety of perspectives from different disciplines, including Biochemistry Cell and Molecular Biology Immunology Structural Biology Biophysics Biomechanics Regenerative Medicine The interests of the Editorial Board are to understand, mechanistically, the structure-function relationships in connective tissue extracellular matrix, and its associated cells, through interpretation of sophisticated experimentation using state-of-the-art technologies that include molecular genetics, imaging, immunology, biomechanics and tissue engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信