Evaluation of quality of life in children with precocious puberty

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
İlkay N. Yılmazer, Sema Nilay Abseyi, Gizem Şenyazar, Merih Berberoğlu, Zeynep Şıklar, Zehra Aycan
{"title":"Evaluation of quality of life in children with precocious puberty","authors":"İlkay N. Yılmazer,&nbsp;Sema Nilay Abseyi,&nbsp;Gizem Şenyazar,&nbsp;Merih Berberoğlu,&nbsp;Zeynep Şıklar,&nbsp;Zehra Aycan","doi":"10.1111/cen.15033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to investigate the quality of life of patients with central precocious puberty (CPP) who required treatment and premature thelarche (PT) followed up without treatment and to compare the groups with and without treatment among themselves and with healthy children.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, Patients and Measurement</h3>\n \n <p>This study is designed as a case–control study. A total of 193 children including 59 children with CPP, 53 children with PT, 81 healthy children and their parents were included in the study. A questionnaire was applied to evaluate the sociodemographic characteristics that would affect the quality of life. The ‘Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)’ was used to assess the quality of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The PedsQL total scale score was 78.10 ± 17.13, 79.35 ± 11.54 and 79.52 ± 14.65, the psychosocial health summary score was 78.86 ± 16.83, 79.40 ± 12.54 and 79.94 ± 14.94 and physical health summary score was 75.81 ± 20.69, 79.41 ± 15.04 and 78.25 ± 17.52 in CPP, PT and control groups, respectively; however, there was no statistical difference (<i>p</i> &gt; .05). In the scale administered to the parents, scores were similar in the three groups. No difference was found between CPP, PT and control groups in terms of sociodemographic data in the study (<i>p</i> &gt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Unlike previous studies, in this study the effects of sociodemographic characteristics and whether treatment was initiated or not on quality of life were investigated. Although the scale scores of the CPP group were lower than the PT and control group, there was no statistically significant difference, indicating that quality of life was not negatively affected in the CPP group receiving treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cen.15033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the quality of life of patients with central precocious puberty (CPP) who required treatment and premature thelarche (PT) followed up without treatment and to compare the groups with and without treatment among themselves and with healthy children.

Design, Patients and Measurement

This study is designed as a case–control study. A total of 193 children including 59 children with CPP, 53 children with PT, 81 healthy children and their parents were included in the study. A questionnaire was applied to evaluate the sociodemographic characteristics that would affect the quality of life. The ‘Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)’ was used to assess the quality of life.

Results

The PedsQL total scale score was 78.10 ± 17.13, 79.35 ± 11.54 and 79.52 ± 14.65, the psychosocial health summary score was 78.86 ± 16.83, 79.40 ± 12.54 and 79.94 ± 14.94 and physical health summary score was 75.81 ± 20.69, 79.41 ± 15.04 and 78.25 ± 17.52 in CPP, PT and control groups, respectively; however, there was no statistical difference (p > .05). In the scale administered to the parents, scores were similar in the three groups. No difference was found between CPP, PT and control groups in terms of sociodemographic data in the study (p > .05).

Conclusion

Unlike previous studies, in this study the effects of sociodemographic characteristics and whether treatment was initiated or not on quality of life were investigated. Although the scale scores of the CPP group were lower than the PT and control group, there was no statistically significant difference, indicating that quality of life was not negatively affected in the CPP group receiving treatment.

评估性早熟儿童的生活质量。
研究目的本研究旨在调查需要治疗的中枢性性早熟(CPP)患者和未接受治疗的过早性早熟(PT)患者的生活质量,并比较接受治疗组和未接受治疗组之间以及与健康儿童之间的生活质量:本研究为病例对照研究。共有 193 名儿童参与了研究,其中包括 59 名 CPP 患儿、53 名 PT 患儿、81 名健康儿童及其家长。研究采用问卷调查的方式,对影响生活质量的社会人口学特征进行评估。儿科生活质量量表(PedsQL)"用于评估生活质量:结果:CPP组、PT组和对照组的儿科生活质量量表总分分别为(78.10 ± 17.13)、(79.35 ± 11.54)和(79.52 ± 14.65)分,社会心理健康总分分别为(78.86 ± 16.83)、(79.40 ± 12.54)和(79.94 ± 14.94)分,身体健康总分分别为(75.81 ± 20.69)、(79.41 ± 15.04)和(78.25 ± 17.52)分,但无统计学差异(P > .05)。在给家长的量表中,三组的得分相似。在社会人口学数据方面,CPP 组、PT 组和对照组之间没有差异(P > .05):与以往的研究不同,本研究调查了社会人口学特征和是否开始治疗对生活质量的影响。虽然 CPP 组的量表评分低于 PT 组和对照组,但在统计学上没有显著差异,这表明接受治疗的 CPP 组的生活质量没有受到负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Endocrinology
Clinical Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信