Secondary Amazon rainforest partially recovers tree cavities suitable for nesting birds in 18–34 years

Carine Dantas Oliveira, Cintia Cornelius, Philip C Stouffer, Kristina L Cockle
{"title":"Secondary Amazon rainforest partially recovers tree cavities suitable for nesting birds in 18–34 years","authors":"Carine Dantas Oliveira, Cintia Cornelius, Philip C Stouffer, Kristina L Cockle","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Passive restoration of secondary forests can partially offset loss of biodiversity following tropical deforestation. Tree cavities, an essential resource for cavity-nesting birds, are usually associated with old forest. We investigated the restoration time for tree cavities suitable for cavity-nesting birds in secondary forest at the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP) in central Amazonian Brazil. We hypothesized that cavity abundance would increase with forest age, but more rapidly in areas exposed to cutting only, compared to areas where forest was cut and burned. We also hypothesized that cavities would be lower, smaller, and less variable in secondary forest than in old-growth forest, which at the BDFFP is part of a vast lowland forest with no recent history of human disturbance. We used pole-mounted cameras and tree-climbing to survey cavities in 39 plots (each 200 × 40 m) across old-growth forests and 11–34-year-old secondary forests. We used generalized linear models to examine how cavity supply was related to forest age and land-use history (cut only vs cut-and-burn), and principal components analysis to compare cavity characteristics between old-growth and secondary forest. Cavity availability increased with secondary forest age, regardless of land-use history, but the oldest secondary forest (31–34 yr) still had fewer cavities (mean ± SE = 9.8 ± 2.2 cavities ha–1) than old-growth forest (20.5 ± 4.2 cavities ha–1). Moreover, secondary forests lacked cavities that were high and deep, with large entrances—characteristics likely to be important for many species of cavity-nesting birds. Several decades may be necessary to restore cavity supply in secondary Amazonian forests, especially for the largest birds (e.g., forest-falcons and parrots > 190 g). Retention of legacy trees as forest is cleared might help maintain a supply of cavities that could allow earlier recolonization by some species of cavity-nesting birds when cleared areas are abandoned. A Portuguese version of this article is available in Supplementary Material 1.","PeriodicalId":501493,"journal":{"name":"The Condor: Ornithological Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Condor: Ornithological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duae008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passive restoration of secondary forests can partially offset loss of biodiversity following tropical deforestation. Tree cavities, an essential resource for cavity-nesting birds, are usually associated with old forest. We investigated the restoration time for tree cavities suitable for cavity-nesting birds in secondary forest at the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP) in central Amazonian Brazil. We hypothesized that cavity abundance would increase with forest age, but more rapidly in areas exposed to cutting only, compared to areas where forest was cut and burned. We also hypothesized that cavities would be lower, smaller, and less variable in secondary forest than in old-growth forest, which at the BDFFP is part of a vast lowland forest with no recent history of human disturbance. We used pole-mounted cameras and tree-climbing to survey cavities in 39 plots (each 200 × 40 m) across old-growth forests and 11–34-year-old secondary forests. We used generalized linear models to examine how cavity supply was related to forest age and land-use history (cut only vs cut-and-burn), and principal components analysis to compare cavity characteristics between old-growth and secondary forest. Cavity availability increased with secondary forest age, regardless of land-use history, but the oldest secondary forest (31–34 yr) still had fewer cavities (mean ± SE = 9.8 ± 2.2 cavities ha–1) than old-growth forest (20.5 ± 4.2 cavities ha–1). Moreover, secondary forests lacked cavities that were high and deep, with large entrances—characteristics likely to be important for many species of cavity-nesting birds. Several decades may be necessary to restore cavity supply in secondary Amazonian forests, especially for the largest birds (e.g., forest-falcons and parrots > 190 g). Retention of legacy trees as forest is cleared might help maintain a supply of cavities that could allow earlier recolonization by some species of cavity-nesting birds when cleared areas are abandoned. A Portuguese version of this article is available in Supplementary Material 1.
亚马逊次生雨林在 18-34 年内部分恢复适合鸟类筑巢的树洞
被动恢复次生林可以部分抵消热带森林砍伐后生物多样性的损失。树洞是穴巢鸟类的重要资源,通常与古老的森林有关。我们在巴西亚马逊中部的森林破碎带生物动力学项目(BDFFP)中调查了次生林中适合穴居鸟类栖息的树洞的恢复时间。我们假设,蛀洞的丰富度会随着森林年龄的增长而增加,但与森林被砍伐和烧毁的地区相比,只受到砍伐的地区蛀洞的增加速度更快。我们还假设,次生林中的蛀洞会比原始森林中的蛀洞更少、更小、变化更小,而原始森林在巴西亚马逊河流域森林保护区(BDFFP)属于广阔的低地森林,近期没有受到过人类干扰。我们使用杆式照相机和爬树方法调查了古老森林和树龄为 11-34 年的次生林中 39 个地块(每个地块 200 × 40 米)的蛀洞。我们使用广义线性模型来研究蛀洞供应与森林年龄和土地使用历史(只砍伐与砍伐后再烧毁)的关系,并使用主成分分析来比较原始森林和次生林的蛀洞特征。随着次生林年龄的增长,蛀洞供应量也在增加,与土地利用历史无关,但最古老的次生林(31-34 年)的蛀洞数量(平均值 ± SE = 9.8 ± 2.2 个蛀洞公顷-1)仍然少于原始森林(20.5 ± 4.2 个蛀洞公顷-1)。此外,次生林缺乏高而深、入口大的蛀洞,而这些特征可能对许多种类的穴巢鸟类非常重要。恢复亚马逊次生林的蛀洞供应可能需要几十年的时间,尤其是对体型最大的鸟类(如森林隼和鹦鹉> 190 g)而言。在清理森林时保留遗留树木可能有助于维持蛀洞供应,从而在清理过的区域被遗弃时,使某些种类的穴巢鸟类能够更早地重新定居。本文的葡萄牙语版本见补充材料1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信