Does Neighborhood Social Cohesion Influence Participation in Routine Cancer Screening? Findings From a Representative Sample of Adults in South Florida.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Jordan A Baeker Bispo, Irene Goo, Kilan Ashad-Bishop, Erin Kobetz, Zinzi Bailey
{"title":"Does Neighborhood Social Cohesion Influence Participation in Routine Cancer Screening? Findings From a Representative Sample of Adults in South Florida.","authors":"Jordan A Baeker Bispo, Irene Goo, Kilan Ashad-Bishop, Erin Kobetz, Zinzi Bailey","doi":"10.1097/FCH.0000000000000400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neighborhood social cohesion (NSC) has been associated with a variety of health outcomes, but limited research has examined its impact on behaviors that support cancer control. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between NSC and guideline-concordant breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from a cross-sectional survey administered to 716 adults in South Florida from 2019 to 2020. The analytic samples included adults eligible for breast (n = 134), cervical (n = 195), and colorectal cancer (n = 265) screening. NSC was measured using a validated 5-item instrument. Associations between NSC and guideline-concordant screening were examined using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In fully adjusted analyses, the odds of guideline-concordant breast cancer screening increased by 86% for every unit increase in NSC (aOR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.03-3.36). NSC was not statistically significantly associated with guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening (aOR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.38) or colorectal cancer screening (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.81-2.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that NSC supports some screening behaviors, namely, mammography use. To better understand heterogeneous relationships between NSC and utilization of preventive care services such as cancer screening, more research is needed that disaggregates effects by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":47183,"journal":{"name":"Family & Community Health","volume":"47 2","pages":"130-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000400","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Neighborhood social cohesion (NSC) has been associated with a variety of health outcomes, but limited research has examined its impact on behaviors that support cancer control. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between NSC and guideline-concordant breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening.

Methods: Data are from a cross-sectional survey administered to 716 adults in South Florida from 2019 to 2020. The analytic samples included adults eligible for breast (n = 134), cervical (n = 195), and colorectal cancer (n = 265) screening. NSC was measured using a validated 5-item instrument. Associations between NSC and guideline-concordant screening were examined using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: In fully adjusted analyses, the odds of guideline-concordant breast cancer screening increased by 86% for every unit increase in NSC (aOR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.03-3.36). NSC was not statistically significantly associated with guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening (aOR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54-1.38) or colorectal cancer screening (aOR = 1.29; 95% CI, 0.81-2.04).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that NSC supports some screening behaviors, namely, mammography use. To better understand heterogeneous relationships between NSC and utilization of preventive care services such as cancer screening, more research is needed that disaggregates effects by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.

邻里社会凝聚力会影响常规癌症筛查的参与吗?南佛罗里达州具有代表性的成人样本调查结果。
背景和目标:邻里社会凝聚力(NSC)与多种健康结果有关,但对其对支持癌症控制行为的影响的研究却很有限。本研究旨在探讨 NSC 与符合指南的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和大肠癌筛查之间的关系:数据来自 2019 年至 2020 年对南佛罗里达州 716 名成年人进行的横断面调查。分析样本包括符合乳腺癌(n = 134)、宫颈癌(n = 195)和结直肠癌(n = 265)筛查条件的成年人。NSC 采用经过验证的 5 项工具进行测量。采用多变量逻辑回归法研究了 NSC 与指南一致性筛查之间的关系:结果:在完全调整分析中,NSC 每增加一个单位,与指南一致的乳腺癌筛查几率就会增加 86%(aOR = 1.86;95% CI,1.03-3.36)。NSC与指南一致的宫颈癌筛查(aOR = 0.86;95% CI,0.54-1.38)或结直肠癌筛查(aOR = 1.29;95% CI,0.81-2.04)在统计学上没有明显关联:这些研究结果表明,NSC 支持某些筛查行为,即使用乳房 X 线照相术。为了更好地了解 NSC 与癌症筛查等预防性保健服务利用率之间的异质性关系,需要开展更多的研究,按性别、年龄、种族/民族和社会经济地位对其影响进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Family & Community Health is a practical quarterly which presents creative, multidisciplinary perspectives and approaches for effective public and community health programs. Each issue focuses on a single timely topic and addresses issues of concern to a wide variety of population groups with diverse ethnic backgrounds, including children and the elderly, men and women, and rural and urban communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信