A Conceptual Instructional Design Model for Executive Education

Giles Blackburne
{"title":"A Conceptual Instructional Design Model for Executive Education","authors":"Giles Blackburne","doi":"10.56395/recap.v1i1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a conceptual instructional design (ID) model for executive education derived from business school good practice and education theory. A review of executive education literature finds that today’s executive education offerings are required to be real-world oriented, closely aligned with the demands of the post-pandemic workplace, attuned to the changing needs and circumstances of adult learners and sufficiently able to deliver immersive learning. A reconnaissance investigation of 14 top-ranked business schools identifies the most frequently adopted teaching and learning approaches in executive education considered as good practice for the sector. These include experiential learning, collaborative learning, and technology-enabled learning. The proposed conceptual instructional design model is rooted in these approaches alongside three key principles that underpin experiential learning, namely authenticity, reflection and collaboration. Moreover the model proposes ADDIE supported teaching approaches to ensure the realisation of these principles within an appropriate constructive learning environment (CLE). Informed by activity theory, an ‘activity system’ is presented as the outer shell of the model to ensure that an executive education-oriented CLE is informed by learner needs and authentic context.","PeriodicalId":517293,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education Curriculum and Pedagogy: Global Perspectives","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education Curriculum and Pedagogy: Global Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56395/recap.v1i1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual instructional design (ID) model for executive education derived from business school good practice and education theory. A review of executive education literature finds that today’s executive education offerings are required to be real-world oriented, closely aligned with the demands of the post-pandemic workplace, attuned to the changing needs and circumstances of adult learners and sufficiently able to deliver immersive learning. A reconnaissance investigation of 14 top-ranked business schools identifies the most frequently adopted teaching and learning approaches in executive education considered as good practice for the sector. These include experiential learning, collaborative learning, and technology-enabled learning. The proposed conceptual instructional design model is rooted in these approaches alongside three key principles that underpin experiential learning, namely authenticity, reflection and collaboration. Moreover the model proposes ADDIE supported teaching approaches to ensure the realisation of these principles within an appropriate constructive learning environment (CLE). Informed by activity theory, an ‘activity system’ is presented as the outer shell of the model to ensure that an executive education-oriented CLE is informed by learner needs and authentic context.
高管教育的概念教学设计模式
本文从商学院的良好实践和教育理论出发,为高管教育提出了一个概念性教学设计(ID)模型。对高管教育文献的综述发现,当今的高管教育课程必须以现实世界为导向,紧密结合流行病后的职场需求,适应成人学员不断变化的需求和环境,并能充分提供沉浸式学习。对 14 所排名靠前的商学院进行的考察调查确定了高管教育中最常采用的教学方法,这些方法被认为是该行业的良好做法。这些方法包括体验式学习、协作式学习和技术辅助学习。所提出的概念教学设计模式以这些方法为基础,并遵循支撑体验式学习的三个关键原则,即真实性、反思和协作。此外,该模型还提出了 ADDIE 支持的教学方法,以确保在适当的建设性学习环境(CLE)中实现这些原则。在活动理论的指导下,"活动系统 "作为该模式的外壳被提出来,以确保以行政人员教育为导向的建构式学习环境是以学习者的需求和真实情境为基础的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信