The Bulletin, ‘Londonisation’ and Scottish Politics in the 1940s and 1950s

Ewen A.B. Cameron
{"title":"The Bulletin, ‘Londonisation’ and Scottish Politics in the 1940s and 1950s","authors":"Ewen A.B. Cameron","doi":"10.3366/shr.2024.0644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to examine Scottish politics in the decade or so following the Second World War. The objective is to uncover the texture of Scottish politics in a period that has been characterised rather simplistically. Much of the evidence for the paper is drawn from the Scottish popular press, most notably newspapers such as the Bulletin, which was a Glasgow publication with a unionist outlook, motivated by a concern to keep Scottish issues to the fore and to resist centralisation. The article will examine the way in which common interpretations of this period in Scottish politics, as being one dominated by a unionism that was common to the main parties, serve to flatten what was an interesting and contested landscape. There is a considerable literature on this period in British historiography that engages in a debate about the value of the idea of ‘consensus’ in British politics. The apparent consensus over the Union hid a range of important debates about the way in which the Union ought to operate that were of such an extent as to bring the idea of a unionist consensus into question. Given that the Scottish National Party was such a marginal force in Scottish politics in this period, it seems more sensible to focus on the debates about the meaning of the Union rather than to adopt an existential focus that was simply not present in day-to-day political debate in the decade following the Second World War.","PeriodicalId":516892,"journal":{"name":"The Scottish Historical Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scottish Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/shr.2024.0644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article seeks to examine Scottish politics in the decade or so following the Second World War. The objective is to uncover the texture of Scottish politics in a period that has been characterised rather simplistically. Much of the evidence for the paper is drawn from the Scottish popular press, most notably newspapers such as the Bulletin, which was a Glasgow publication with a unionist outlook, motivated by a concern to keep Scottish issues to the fore and to resist centralisation. The article will examine the way in which common interpretations of this period in Scottish politics, as being one dominated by a unionism that was common to the main parties, serve to flatten what was an interesting and contested landscape. There is a considerable literature on this period in British historiography that engages in a debate about the value of the idea of ‘consensus’ in British politics. The apparent consensus over the Union hid a range of important debates about the way in which the Union ought to operate that were of such an extent as to bring the idea of a unionist consensus into question. Given that the Scottish National Party was such a marginal force in Scottish politics in this period, it seems more sensible to focus on the debates about the meaning of the Union rather than to adopt an existential focus that was simply not present in day-to-day political debate in the decade following the Second World War.
公告》、"伦敦化 "与二十世纪四五十年代的苏格兰政治
本文旨在研究第二次世界大战后十年左右的苏格兰政治。其目的在于揭示苏格兰政治在这一时期的特点,而这一时期的特点被简单化了。本文的大部分证据来自苏格兰的大众报刊,其中最著名的是《公报》等报纸,《公报》是格拉斯哥的一份具有联盟主义观点的刊物,其动机是关注苏格兰问题并抵制中央集权。这篇文章将探讨对这一时期苏格兰政治的普遍解读,即这一时期的苏格兰政治是由主要政党共同的联盟主义主导的,这种解读方式使这一有趣而又充满争议的时期变得平淡无奇。英国史学界有大量关于这一时期的文献,对英国政治中 "共识 "这一概念的价值进行了讨论。关于联邦的表面共识隐藏着一系列关于联邦运作方式的重要争论,这些争论的程度足以让人们对联邦共识的概念产生质疑。鉴于苏格兰民族党在这一时期是苏格兰政治中的边缘力量,关注有关联邦意义的辩论似乎比关注二战后十年间日常政治辩论中根本不存在的存在问题更为明智。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信