Assessment of health professional students’ perceptions and knowledge about stroke rehabilitation teams and the role of speech and language therapists in Bangladesh

Moitry Chakraborty, Md Sazzad Hossain, Iqbal Kabir Jahid, Md Abdul Koddus Jahid, Fida Al-Shams, Ruksana Akter, Shahid Afridi
{"title":"Assessment of health professional students’ perceptions and knowledge about stroke rehabilitation teams and the role of speech and language therapists in Bangladesh","authors":"Moitry Chakraborty, Md Sazzad Hossain, Iqbal Kabir Jahid, Md Abdul Koddus Jahid, Fida Al-Shams, Ruksana Akter, Shahid Afridi","doi":"10.5348/100031p16mc2024ra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aims: Effective collaboration and interdisciplinary methods are crucial in the field of stroke treatment. The engagement of speech and language therapists (SLTs) with stroke rehabilitation teams is not familiar in the context of Bangladesh. The aims were to investigate health professional students’ perceptions and experiences of the stroke rehabilitation team and the role of the speech and language therapist (SLT).\n\n Methods: We tailored a structured questionnaire to suit the stroke rehabilitation landscape in Bangladesh where a diverse group of 150 students enrolled in various disciplines including physiotherapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), speech and language therapy (SLT), psychology, medicine (MBBS), and nursing participated in the survey.\n\n Results: Our study, which covered a broad range of fields, found a positive tendency toward collaborative team models including Multidisciplinary, Transdisciplinary, and Interdisciplinary. The Kruskal–Wallis test’s statistical analysis (p greater than 0.05) revealed a thorough comprehension of the nuances of various team models. Students, however, showed ambiguity in understanding the particular roles and specialties of certain experts. There were several interesting results, such as the preference for the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) model by 93.30% of occupational therapy students against the Transdisciplinary Team (TDT) model by 79.30% of SLT students. Additionally, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) model received support from 10.7% of participants.\n\n Conclusion: Bangladesh reported findings of this study highlight the significance of bridging the gap between academic and clinical training, cleaning up common misconceptions, and encouraging cooperative inter-professional teamwork. This includes promoting a thorough knowledge of the various responsibilities played in the field of stroke rehabilitation, particularly those of speech and language therapists.\n","PeriodicalId":517338,"journal":{"name":"Edorium Journal of Public Health","volume":"231 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edorium Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/100031p16mc2024ra","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Effective collaboration and interdisciplinary methods are crucial in the field of stroke treatment. The engagement of speech and language therapists (SLTs) with stroke rehabilitation teams is not familiar in the context of Bangladesh. The aims were to investigate health professional students’ perceptions and experiences of the stroke rehabilitation team and the role of the speech and language therapist (SLT). Methods: We tailored a structured questionnaire to suit the stroke rehabilitation landscape in Bangladesh where a diverse group of 150 students enrolled in various disciplines including physiotherapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT), speech and language therapy (SLT), psychology, medicine (MBBS), and nursing participated in the survey. Results: Our study, which covered a broad range of fields, found a positive tendency toward collaborative team models including Multidisciplinary, Transdisciplinary, and Interdisciplinary. The Kruskal–Wallis test’s statistical analysis (p greater than 0.05) revealed a thorough comprehension of the nuances of various team models. Students, however, showed ambiguity in understanding the particular roles and specialties of certain experts. There were several interesting results, such as the preference for the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) model by 93.30% of occupational therapy students against the Transdisciplinary Team (TDT) model by 79.30% of SLT students. Additionally, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) model received support from 10.7% of participants. Conclusion: Bangladesh reported findings of this study highlight the significance of bridging the gap between academic and clinical training, cleaning up common misconceptions, and encouraging cooperative inter-professional teamwork. This includes promoting a thorough knowledge of the various responsibilities played in the field of stroke rehabilitation, particularly those of speech and language therapists.
评估卫生专业学生对孟加拉国中风康复团队及言语和语言治疗师作用的看法和知识
目的:在中风治疗领域,有效的合作和跨学科方法至关重要。在孟加拉国,言语和语言治疗师(SLT)与中风康复团队的合作并不常见。研究旨在调查卫生专业学生对中风康复团队以及言语和语言治疗师(SLT)角色的看法和体验。调查方法我们根据孟加拉国的中风康复情况定制了一份结构化问卷,150 名不同专业的学生参加了调查,包括物理治疗(PT)、职业治疗(OT)、言语和语言治疗(SLT)、心理学、医学(MBBS)和护理学。结果我们的研究涵盖了广泛的领域,发现了多学科、跨学科和跨学科等协作团队模式的积极趋势。Kruskal-Wallis 检验的统计分析(P 大于 0.05)显示,学生对各种团队模式的细微差别有透彻的理解。然而,学生们对某些专家的特定角色和专长的理解却很模糊。有几项有趣的结果,如 93.30% 的职业疗法学生倾向于多学科团队(MDT)模式,而 79.30% 的 SLT 学生倾向于跨学科团队(TDT)模式。此外,10.7%的参与者支持跨学科团队(IDT)模式。结论:孟加拉国报告的这项研究结果凸显了弥合学术和临床培训之间的差距、消除常见误解以及鼓励跨专业团队合作的重要性。这包括促进对中风康复领域中各种职责的全面了解,尤其是言语和语言治疗师的职责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信