Evolution of approaches to the connection of the “old” and the “new” in the historical urban environment

A. O. Nichiporovich
{"title":"Evolution of approaches to the connection of the “old” and the “new” in the historical urban environment","authors":"A. O. Nichiporovich","doi":"10.29235/2524-2369-2024-69-1-45-52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of modern processes of globalization, the problem of preserving architectural heritage as part of national culture is actualized. At the same time, the need for the final development of historical centers, bringing them to the modern requirements of comfort, accompanied by interference in the historical context, pose the task of developing principles and approaches to combining the “old” and “new”, taking into account the categories of “integrity”, “value”, “authenticity”, “spirit places” (genius loci) of the historical environment of the city and contributing to the continuity of urban development.The purpose of the article is to highlight the current principles and approaches to architectural activity in the current urban environment, as well as to identify the prerequisites for their formation.Based on the methods of historical research of the evolution of theoretical foundations in the field of preservation and development of historical centers of cities, the development of architectural trends of the XX century and architectural and artistic analysis of modern world design practice, the following prerequisites for the formation of modern approaches to the connection of the “old” and ”new” historical environment are identified: the development of theory and practice in the field of preservation of architectural heritage (approval of the categories “monument”, “authenticity”, “value”, “spirit of the place”, “layers of time”, etc.); the development of modernist architecture (the concept of the correspondence of architecture to its time); the development of postmodern architecture (the emergence of a modern approach, appeal to the styles of the past, “stylization”); the development of digital design technologies at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries (new possibilities of shaping, de-constructivism, nonlinear parametric architecture). The following principles of formation of approaches of modern project activity in the historical urban environment are highlighted: subordination to context (environmental approach, “stylization”); subordination of “old” and “new” (conceptual approach or equality of “old” and “new”); independence (contrast of “old” and “new”). ","PeriodicalId":517292,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Humanitarian Series","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Humanitarian Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29235/2524-2369-2024-69-1-45-52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of modern processes of globalization, the problem of preserving architectural heritage as part of national culture is actualized. At the same time, the need for the final development of historical centers, bringing them to the modern requirements of comfort, accompanied by interference in the historical context, pose the task of developing principles and approaches to combining the “old” and “new”, taking into account the categories of “integrity”, “value”, “authenticity”, “spirit places” (genius loci) of the historical environment of the city and contributing to the continuity of urban development.The purpose of the article is to highlight the current principles and approaches to architectural activity in the current urban environment, as well as to identify the prerequisites for their formation.Based on the methods of historical research of the evolution of theoretical foundations in the field of preservation and development of historical centers of cities, the development of architectural trends of the XX century and architectural and artistic analysis of modern world design practice, the following prerequisites for the formation of modern approaches to the connection of the “old” and ”new” historical environment are identified: the development of theory and practice in the field of preservation of architectural heritage (approval of the categories “monument”, “authenticity”, “value”, “spirit of the place”, “layers of time”, etc.); the development of modernist architecture (the concept of the correspondence of architecture to its time); the development of postmodern architecture (the emergence of a modern approach, appeal to the styles of the past, “stylization”); the development of digital design technologies at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries (new possibilities of shaping, de-constructivism, nonlinear parametric architecture). The following principles of formation of approaches of modern project activity in the historical urban environment are highlighted: subordination to context (environmental approach, “stylization”); subordination of “old” and “new” (conceptual approach or equality of “old” and “new”); independence (contrast of “old” and “new”). 
城市历史环境中 "新 "与 "旧 "连接方式的演变
在现代全球化进程的背景下,保护作为民族文化一部分的建筑遗产的问题变得更加现实。与此同时,由于需要对历史中心进行最终开发,使其符合现代舒适度的要求,同时对历史背景进行干预,这就提出了制定原则和方法的任务,以便将 "旧 "与 "新 "结合起来,同时考虑到城市历史环境的 "完整性"、"价值"、"真实性"、"精神场所"(genius loci)等类别,并促进城市发展的连续性。文章旨在强调当前城市环境中建筑活动的现行原则和方法,并确定其形成的先决条件。根据对城市历史中心保护和发展领域理论基础演变的历史研究方法、二十世纪建筑趋势的发展以及对现代世界设计实践的建筑和艺术分析,确定了形成连接 "旧 "和 "新 "历史环境的现代方法的以下先决条件:建筑遗产保护领域的理论和实践的发展(批准 "纪念碑"、"真实性"、"价值"、"地方精神"、"时间层 "等类别);现代主义建筑的发展。);现代主义建筑的发展(建筑与时代相对应的概念);后现代建筑的发展(现代方法的出现、对过去风格的诉求、"风格化");二十至二十一世纪之交数字设计技术的发展(新的造型可能性、去结构主义、非线性参数化建筑)。强调了在历史城市环境中形成现代项目活动方法的以下原则:从属于环境(环境方法、"风格化");"新 "与 "旧 "的从属关系(概念方法或 "新 "与 "旧 "的平等);独立性("新 "与 "旧 "的对比)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信