Public Voices in the Environmental Decision-Making in Georgia

Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n1p356
M. Chichua, L. Matchavariani
{"title":"Public Voices in the Environmental Decision-Making in Georgia","authors":"M. Chichua, L. Matchavariani","doi":"10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n1p356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of the scientific research and gives the ways to solve the problems dedicated to PP (public participation) in the process of EDM (environmental decision-making) in Georgia. Several obstacles were found, by studying the environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Georgia. All necessary information was collected through interviews and questionnaires. The study discusses the existing legislation on this issue and aims to find answers to these obstacles. Four hypotheses were developed - transparency in the decision-making process promotes successful public participation, effective cooperation with one another is a better way for NGOs to participate in the environmental decision-making process, Georgian NGO’s successful participation in the process of DM (decision-making) was related to the development of an environmental legal system, self-financing helps the Environmental NGOs in Georgia to improve their financial status and increase their flexibility in the EDM  process. The Soviet regime caused the nonexistence of PP approaches in EDM. Currently, many international and trans-boundary projects are taking place and will be completed shortly in Georgia. The participation of the public, especially non-governmental organizations is a key point and crucial element in decision making as most of these developments entail additional environmental problems and to prevent damage to the environment and foster sustainable development when such projects are completed. The research gives key provisions that require improvement to increase the effectiveness of PP in EDM process. \nKeywords: public participation, environment, decision-making, NGOs","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n1p356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of the scientific research and gives the ways to solve the problems dedicated to PP (public participation) in the process of EDM (environmental decision-making) in Georgia. Several obstacles were found, by studying the environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Georgia. All necessary information was collected through interviews and questionnaires. The study discusses the existing legislation on this issue and aims to find answers to these obstacles. Four hypotheses were developed - transparency in the decision-making process promotes successful public participation, effective cooperation with one another is a better way for NGOs to participate in the environmental decision-making process, Georgian NGO’s successful participation in the process of DM (decision-making) was related to the development of an environmental legal system, self-financing helps the Environmental NGOs in Georgia to improve their financial status and increase their flexibility in the EDM  process. The Soviet regime caused the nonexistence of PP approaches in EDM. Currently, many international and trans-boundary projects are taking place and will be completed shortly in Georgia. The participation of the public, especially non-governmental organizations is a key point and crucial element in decision making as most of these developments entail additional environmental problems and to prevent damage to the environment and foster sustainable development when such projects are completed. The research gives key provisions that require improvement to increase the effectiveness of PP in EDM process. Keywords: public participation, environment, decision-making, NGOs
分享
查看原文
佐治亚州环境决策中的公众声音
文章介绍了科学研究的结果,并给出了解决格鲁吉亚环境决策过程中公众参与问题的方法。通过对格鲁吉亚非政府环境组织(NGOs)的研究,发现了一些障碍。通过访谈和问卷调查收集了所有必要信息。本研究讨论了有关该问题的现行立法,旨在找到这些障碍的答案。研究提出了四个假设--决策过程的透明度能够促进公众的成功参与;相互之间的有效合作是非政府组织参与环境决策过程的更好方式;格鲁吉亚非政府组织成功参与 DM(决策)过程与环境法律体系的发展有关;自筹资金有助于格鲁吉亚非政府环保组织改善其财务状况并提高其在 EDM 过程中的灵活性。苏维埃政权导致在环境需求管理中不存在PP方法。目前,许多国际和跨境项目正在格鲁吉亚进行,并将很快完成。公众,尤其是非政府组织的参与是决策过程中的关键点和关键因素,因为这些开发项目大多会带来更多的环境问题,在这些项目完成后,要防止对环境造成破坏并促进可持续发展。研究给出了需要改进的关键条款,以提高公众参与在环境需求管理过程中的有效性。关键词:公众参与、环境、决策、非政府组织
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信