The failure of micro-hydro technology: A case study of the Banyubiru project in Central Java, Indonesia

Vindi Andi Kurniawan , Pratama Yudha Pradheksa , RahmatFauzi Saleh
{"title":"The failure of micro-hydro technology: A case study of the Banyubiru project in Central Java, Indonesia","authors":"Vindi Andi Kurniawan ,&nbsp;Pratama Yudha Pradheksa ,&nbsp;RahmatFauzi Saleh","doi":"10.1016/j.rset.2024.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article explores the potential convergence between the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) framework and failure studies in the context of the alternative energy program in the Global South. It focuses on a single case study, namely the failure of micro-hydro technology in Banyubiru (the Banyubiru project). Using qualitative research methods, this article examines the construction of the Banyubiru project and its failure to integrate with the power grid of the Indonesia State Electricity Company (PLN), despite substantial investments, installations, and considerable interest in renewable energy from diverse stakeholder groups at local, national, and international levels. In a hybrid (online and in-person) format, semi-structured interviews were employed to obtain data. The data collection procedure also includes site visits, observations, and document analysis. The finding indicates that technology development follows a more complicated path than a straight one from interpretative flexibility to closure. It illustrates a progression from closure to interpretive flexibility, wherein social groupings initially establish formal agreements but afterwards encounter conflicting interpretations. In conclusion, the article illustrates the potential for failure studies to provide insights into the limitations of SCOT in the analysis of energy technology failures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101071,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X24000059/pdfft?md5=c2e134a50555ca479b1ebdcb6daed525&pid=1-s2.0-S2667095X24000059-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667095X24000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores the potential convergence between the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) framework and failure studies in the context of the alternative energy program in the Global South. It focuses on a single case study, namely the failure of micro-hydro technology in Banyubiru (the Banyubiru project). Using qualitative research methods, this article examines the construction of the Banyubiru project and its failure to integrate with the power grid of the Indonesia State Electricity Company (PLN), despite substantial investments, installations, and considerable interest in renewable energy from diverse stakeholder groups at local, national, and international levels. In a hybrid (online and in-person) format, semi-structured interviews were employed to obtain data. The data collection procedure also includes site visits, observations, and document analysis. The finding indicates that technology development follows a more complicated path than a straight one from interpretative flexibility to closure. It illustrates a progression from closure to interpretive flexibility, wherein social groupings initially establish formal agreements but afterwards encounter conflicting interpretations. In conclusion, the article illustrates the potential for failure studies to provide insights into the limitations of SCOT in the analysis of energy technology failures.

微型水力发电技术的失败:印度尼西亚中爪哇 Banyubiru 项目案例研究
本文以全球南部的替代能源项目为背景,探讨了技术的社会建构(SCOT)框架与失败研究之间的潜在融合。文章重点关注一个案例研究,即班尤比鲁微型水电技术(班尤比鲁项目)的失败。本文采用定性研究方法,探讨了班尤比鲁项目的建设及其与印度尼西亚国家电力公司(PLN)电网整合的失败,尽管在地方、国家和国际层面上进行了大量投资和安装,不同的利益相关群体对可再生能源也表现出了极大的兴趣。为了获得数据,我们采用了半结构化访谈的混合(在线和面对面)形式。数据收集程序还包括实地考察、观察和文件分析。研究结果表明,技术开发所遵循的路径更为复杂,而不是从解释灵活性到封闭性的直线路径。它说明了从封闭性到解释灵活性的发展过程,在这一过程中,社会群体最初会达成正式协议,但随后会遇到相互冲突的解释。总之,文章说明了失败研究的潜力,可以让人们深入了解 SCOT 在分析能源技术失败方面的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信