Peculiarities of establishing the fact of recognition of paternity under the legislation of the Russian Federation

A. R. Purge
{"title":"Peculiarities of establishing the fact of recognition of paternity under the legislation of the Russian Federation","authors":"A. R. Purge","doi":"10.25136/2409-7136.2024.2.69755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The subject of the study is the norms of Russian family legislation regulating relations related to the procedure for establishing the fact of recognition of paternity. The object of this study is family and procedural relations arising in connection with the establishment of the fact of recognition of paternity. The concept of \"illegitimate children\" is one of the oldest in the history of law. His appearance is associated with the strengthening of the monogamous family. The universal principle of equality, declared for the first time in Soviet law, demanded the equalization of illegitimate children, including in rights with children born in marriage. However, until the very end of the action of the CPC of the RSFSR, such a fact as the recognition of paternity was absent from it. Since the procedural features of the proceedings to establish the fact of recognition of paternity could not be reflected in the IC of the Russian Federation – due to the material nature of the regulated relations, for the purpose of uniform application of civil procedure legislation regulating the procedure for considering cases of special proceedings, the fact of recognition of paternity was for the first time included in the list of facts of legal significance established by the CPC of the Russian Federation. Thus, the date of occurrence in the Russian civil procedure legislation of the institution of establishing the fact of recognition of paternity is (if we do not accept the judicial practice that created it) the date of entry into force of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in 2002.    In the course of the work, general scientific and special methods of cognition were used: comparative legal in the analysis of new and previously existing family legal norms, as well as the formal legal method. It cannot be said that the procedural rules for establishing paternity have not been the object of research in Russian jurisprudence. However, issues of non–search proceedings, issues of establishing the fact of recognition of paternity - attention in these studies has not been adequately paid, although procedural features and the presence of a considerable number of problematic aspects of the consideration of this category of cases are beyond doubt. So far, this institution has not been significantly demanded by judicial practice, but a special military operation implies an increase in its relevance, since in the absence of the serviceman himself, the court requires any evidence of the fact that he recognizes paternity in relation to the child. Currently, this status is particularly important for receiving social benefits that the State has guaranteed to members of military families.\n","PeriodicalId":504347,"journal":{"name":"Юридические исследования","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Юридические исследования","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2024.2.69755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the study is the norms of Russian family legislation regulating relations related to the procedure for establishing the fact of recognition of paternity. The object of this study is family and procedural relations arising in connection with the establishment of the fact of recognition of paternity. The concept of "illegitimate children" is one of the oldest in the history of law. His appearance is associated with the strengthening of the monogamous family. The universal principle of equality, declared for the first time in Soviet law, demanded the equalization of illegitimate children, including in rights with children born in marriage. However, until the very end of the action of the CPC of the RSFSR, such a fact as the recognition of paternity was absent from it. Since the procedural features of the proceedings to establish the fact of recognition of paternity could not be reflected in the IC of the Russian Federation – due to the material nature of the regulated relations, for the purpose of uniform application of civil procedure legislation regulating the procedure for considering cases of special proceedings, the fact of recognition of paternity was for the first time included in the list of facts of legal significance established by the CPC of the Russian Federation. Thus, the date of occurrence in the Russian civil procedure legislation of the institution of establishing the fact of recognition of paternity is (if we do not accept the judicial practice that created it) the date of entry into force of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in 2002.    In the course of the work, general scientific and special methods of cognition were used: comparative legal in the analysis of new and previously existing family legal norms, as well as the formal legal method. It cannot be said that the procedural rules for establishing paternity have not been the object of research in Russian jurisprudence. However, issues of non–search proceedings, issues of establishing the fact of recognition of paternity - attention in these studies has not been adequately paid, although procedural features and the presence of a considerable number of problematic aspects of the consideration of this category of cases are beyond doubt. So far, this institution has not been significantly demanded by judicial practice, but a special military operation implies an increase in its relevance, since in the absence of the serviceman himself, the court requires any evidence of the fact that he recognizes paternity in relation to the child. Currently, this status is particularly important for receiving social benefits that the State has guaranteed to members of military families.
根据俄罗斯联邦法律确认亲子关系事实的特殊性
本研究的主题是俄罗斯家庭立法中调节与确认亲子关系的程序有关的关系的准则。本研究的对象是与确认亲子关系的事实有关的家庭关系和程序关系。非婚生子女 "的概念是法律史上最古老的概念之一。它的出现与一夫一妻制家庭的加强有关。苏联法律首次宣布的普遍平等原则要求非婚生子女享有平等权利,包括与婚生子女平等的权利。然而,直到苏维埃联邦社会主义共和国共产党行动的最后一刻,也没有承认父子关系这一事实。由于确定亲子关系事实的诉讼程序特点无法在《俄罗斯联邦集成电路》中体现--由于所调节关系的物 质性质,为了统一适用规范特殊诉讼案件审理程序的民事诉讼立法,亲子关系事实首次被列入《俄罗斯联邦共 和国刑事诉讼法典》确定的具有法律意义的事实清单中。因此,在俄罗斯民事诉讼立法中确立亲子鉴定事实制度的日期(如果我们不接受创立该制度的司法实践) 是《俄罗斯联邦民事诉讼法典》于 2002 年生效的日期。 在工作过程中使用了一般科学方法和特殊认知方法:在分析新的和以前存在的家庭法律规范时使用的 比较法律方法以及正式法律方法。不能说确定亲子关系的程序规则不是俄罗斯法理学的研究对象。然而,非调查程序问题、确定亲子关系事实的问题--在这些研究中并未得到充分关注,尽管程序特 点和此类案件审理中存在的大量问题是毋庸置疑的。迄今为止,司法实践对这一制度的要求并不高,但特殊的军事行动意味着其相关性的提高,因 为在军人本人不在场的情况下,法院需要任何证据证明他承认与孩子的父子关系。目前,这种身份对于获得国家保障军人家庭成员享有的社会福利尤为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信