Modern Problems of Void Transactions in the Civil Law of the Russian Federation

Almira Raisovna Kuznetsova
{"title":"Modern Problems of Void Transactions in the Civil Law of the Russian Federation","authors":"Almira Raisovna Kuznetsova","doi":"10.25136/2409-7136.2024.2.39743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The article examines the legal, organizational foundations and a number of topical problems of insignificant transactions in Russian legislation with an indication of the origins of these norms in ancient Roman jurisprudence. The subject of the study is the problems caused by the recognition of transactions as insignificant in modern Russia. The object of the study is the legal provisions of civil law that carry out the legal regulation of void transactions. The purpose of the work is to form proposals that contribute to their leveling by identifying and analyzing the actual problems of the insignificance of transactions. The methods used are dialectical-materialistic, historical, a system of empirical research methods (analogy, modeling) and special methods (formal-logical, system-analytical), etc. The author examines in detail the signs of void transactions, the problems of recognizing the nullity of the transaction; the subject of which is property, with respect to the disposal of which there is an imperative prohibition, restriction. Particular attention is paid to the problems of the insignificance of the part of the transaction. The main conclusions of this study are the following: it is justified to bring into compliance with Article 12 of the Civil Code and the legal position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (Resolution of the Plenum of June 23, 2015 No. 25) with respect to the method of protecting civil rights (\"application of the consequences of the invalidity of an insignificant transaction\"); to formulate Article 169 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in a new edition reflecting the concept of \"public interest\". A special contribution of the author to the study of the topic is the proposal to specify Article 180 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in terms of indicating exceptions to the general rule of invalidation of part of the transaction. The results of the article can be used in improving civil legislation, in law enforcement, in further scientific research. Conclusions: despite the improvement of the norms of civil law, the massive nature of the recognition of transactions as void indicates significant problems, as insignificant transactions in general, as well as parts of these transactions (in practical and scientific-theoretical contexts), requiring optimal solutions.\n","PeriodicalId":504347,"journal":{"name":"Юридические исследования","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Юридические исследования","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2024.2.39743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the legal, organizational foundations and a number of topical problems of insignificant transactions in Russian legislation with an indication of the origins of these norms in ancient Roman jurisprudence. The subject of the study is the problems caused by the recognition of transactions as insignificant in modern Russia. The object of the study is the legal provisions of civil law that carry out the legal regulation of void transactions. The purpose of the work is to form proposals that contribute to their leveling by identifying and analyzing the actual problems of the insignificance of transactions. The methods used are dialectical-materialistic, historical, a system of empirical research methods (analogy, modeling) and special methods (formal-logical, system-analytical), etc. The author examines in detail the signs of void transactions, the problems of recognizing the nullity of the transaction; the subject of which is property, with respect to the disposal of which there is an imperative prohibition, restriction. Particular attention is paid to the problems of the insignificance of the part of the transaction. The main conclusions of this study are the following: it is justified to bring into compliance with Article 12 of the Civil Code and the legal position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (Resolution of the Plenum of June 23, 2015 No. 25) with respect to the method of protecting civil rights ("application of the consequences of the invalidity of an insignificant transaction"); to formulate Article 169 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in a new edition reflecting the concept of "public interest". A special contribution of the author to the study of the topic is the proposal to specify Article 180 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in terms of indicating exceptions to the general rule of invalidation of part of the transaction. The results of the article can be used in improving civil legislation, in law enforcement, in further scientific research. Conclusions: despite the improvement of the norms of civil law, the massive nature of the recognition of transactions as void indicates significant problems, as insignificant transactions in general, as well as parts of these transactions (in practical and scientific-theoretical contexts), requiring optimal solutions.
俄罗斯联邦民法中无效交易的现代问题
文章研究了俄罗斯立法中无关紧要交易的法律、组织基础和一系列热点问题,并指出了这些规范在古罗马法学中的起源。研究的主题是在现代俄罗斯将交易认定为不重要交易所引发的问题。研究对象是对无效交易进行法律规范的民法法律条款。工作的目的是通过确定和分析交易不重要的实际问题,形成有助于平息交易的建议。所使用的方法包括辩证唯物主义方法、历史方法、实证研究方法体系(类比、建模)和特殊方法(形式逻辑、系统分析)等。作者详细研究了无效交易的征兆、确认交易无效的问题;交易的主体是财产,对财产的处置有强制性的禁止和限制。本研究特别关注了交易部分不重要的问题。本研究的主要结论如下:有理由遵守《民法典》第 12 条和俄罗斯联邦最高法院关于公民权利保护方法("不重要交易无效后果的适用")的法律立场(2015 年 6 月 23 日第 25 号全会决议);制定反映 "公共利益 "概念的新版《俄罗斯联邦民法典》第 169 条。作者对该专题研究的一个特殊贡献是建议明确《俄罗斯联邦民法典》第 180 条,指出部分交易无效的一般规则的例外情况。文章的成果可用于完善民事立法、执法和进一步的科学研究。结论:尽管民法规范有所改进,但承认交易无效的大规模现象表明存在重大问题,因为一般 交易以及部分交易(在实践和科学理论背景下)都不重要,需要最佳解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信