Estimating groundwater recharge rates in the Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia under different combinations of model complexity and objective functions

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 Environmental Science
Muauz Amare Redda, Behailu Birhanu, Bediru Hussien
{"title":"Estimating groundwater recharge rates in the Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia under different combinations of model complexity and objective functions","authors":"Muauz Amare Redda, Behailu Birhanu, Bediru Hussien","doi":"10.2166/nh.2024.059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reliable quantification of groundwater recharge rate is crucial for the sustainable utilization of groundwater resources. However, little information is documented about the uncertainty associated with recharge rate estimation from the different combinations of model complexity and objective function perspectives. Therefore, this study aims to (i) analyze the sensitivity of the model parameters under different combinations of model complexities and objective functions and (ii) estimate the groundwater recharge rate in the Hombele catchment, Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia, for different combinations of objective functions and model complexities. The effect of these model complexities in estimating groundwater recharge rate and parametrizing model parameters was quantified for the period 1986–2013. A total of 10 combinations of model complexities and objective functions were used for the analysis. The Kling–Gupta efficiency (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency) values for calibration, validation, and the whole period are 0.89 (0.80), 0.80 (0.73), and 0.87 (0.77), respectively, when a semi-distributed HBV-light model was used. For all objective functions, we found that the average annual recharge rate of the study catchment ranges from 185.9 to 280.5 mm when the HBV-light model was considered as a semi-distributed model. In contrast, the average annual recharge rate ranges from 185.3 to 321.7 mm when applying the HBV-light model as a lumped model.","PeriodicalId":55040,"journal":{"name":"Hydrology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrology Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable quantification of groundwater recharge rate is crucial for the sustainable utilization of groundwater resources. However, little information is documented about the uncertainty associated with recharge rate estimation from the different combinations of model complexity and objective function perspectives. Therefore, this study aims to (i) analyze the sensitivity of the model parameters under different combinations of model complexities and objective functions and (ii) estimate the groundwater recharge rate in the Hombele catchment, Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia, for different combinations of objective functions and model complexities. The effect of these model complexities in estimating groundwater recharge rate and parametrizing model parameters was quantified for the period 1986–2013. A total of 10 combinations of model complexities and objective functions were used for the analysis. The Kling–Gupta efficiency (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency) values for calibration, validation, and the whole period are 0.89 (0.80), 0.80 (0.73), and 0.87 (0.77), respectively, when a semi-distributed HBV-light model was used. For all objective functions, we found that the average annual recharge rate of the study catchment ranges from 185.9 to 280.5 mm when the HBV-light model was considered as a semi-distributed model. In contrast, the average annual recharge rate ranges from 185.3 to 321.7 mm when applying the HBV-light model as a lumped model.
在不同的模型复杂性和目标函数组合下估算埃塞俄比亚上阿瓦士盆地的地下水补给率
地下水补给率的可靠量化对于地下水资源的可持续利用至关重要。然而,有关从模型复杂性和目标函数的不同组合角度估算补给率的不确定性的资料很少。因此,本研究旨在:(i) 分析模型参数在模型复杂性和目标函数不同组合下的敏感性;(ii) 针对目标函数和模型复杂性的不同组合,估算埃塞俄比亚上阿瓦士盆地 Hombele 流域的地下水补给率。对 1986-2013 年期间这些模型复杂性在估算地下水补给率和参数化模型参数方面的影响进行了量化。分析共使用了 10 种模型复杂性和目标函数组合。当采用半分布式 HBVlight 模型时,校准、验证和整个期间的 Kling-Gupta 效率(Nash-Sutcliffe 效率)值分别为 0.89 (0.80)、0.80 (0.73) 和 0.87 (0.77)。对于所有目标函数,我们发现,当 HBV-light 模型被视为半分布模型时,研究流域的年平均补给率在 185.9 至 280.5 毫米之间。相比之下,将 HBV light 模型作为一个整体模型时,年平均补给率在 185.3 至 321.7 毫米之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrology Research
Hydrology Research Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrology Research provides international coverage on all aspects of hydrology in its widest sense, and welcomes the submission of papers from across the subject. While emphasis is placed on studies of the hydrological cycle, the Journal also covers the physics and chemistry of water. Hydrology Research is intended to be a link between basic hydrological research and the practical application of scientific results within the broad field of water management.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信