The Impact of Rotation Model on Minimizing Inflectional Morphemes Errors in English Writing: A Comparative Study of Error Analysis

Theory and Practice in Language Studies Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.17507/tpls.1402.01

Mohammad Usama, Sohaib Alam, Shashikanta Tarai, Sameena Banu

{"title":"The Impact of Rotation Model on Minimizing Inflectional Morphemes Errors in English Writing: A Comparative Study of Error Analysis","authors":"Mohammad Usama, Sohaib Alam, Shashikanta Tarai, Sameena Banu","doi":"10.17507/tpls.1402.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to analyze 12th-grade students’ writing errors related to inflectional morphemes. In addition, the research measures efficacy of the Rotation Model (RM) and the Grammar Translation Method (GTM) in minimizing writing errors among learners of English. Comparative studies are rare to find the effectiveness of two teaching models in the context of error analysis. Eighty-two samples were taken into consideration for randomize sampling. The present research is divided into two groups; the experimental group, consisting of 41 participants, provided with instruction via RM, and the control group, also comprising 41 individuals, being taught through GTM. Pre and post-test treatment data were collected and analyzed with the help of SPSS 22. The results revealed common errors with inflectional morphemes among both groups. Additionally, the mean values for each type of error were significantly minimized due to the post-instruction of RM compared to the GTM. The study’s findings largely devoted to pedagogical improvement among ESL learners’ writing. The findings are reviewed concerning future research directions and instructional strategies.","PeriodicalId":23004,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","volume":"33 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to analyze 12th-grade students’ writing errors related to inflectional morphemes. In addition, the research measures efficacy of the Rotation Model (RM) and the Grammar Translation Method (GTM) in minimizing writing errors among learners of English. Comparative studies are rare to find the effectiveness of two teaching models in the context of error analysis. Eighty-two samples were taken into consideration for randomize sampling. The present research is divided into two groups; the experimental group, consisting of 41 participants, provided with instruction via RM, and the control group, also comprising 41 individuals, being taught through GTM. Pre and post-test treatment data were collected and analyzed with the help of SPSS 22. The results revealed common errors with inflectional morphemes among both groups. Additionally, the mean values for each type of error were significantly minimized due to the post-instruction of RM compared to the GTM. The study’s findings largely devoted to pedagogical improvement among ESL learners’ writing. The findings are reviewed concerning future research directions and instructional strategies.

查看原文本刊更多论文

旋转模式对减少英语写作中屈折语词素错误的影响：错误分析比较研究

本研究旨在分析十二年级学生与词素相关的写作错误。此外，研究还衡量了旋转教学法（RM）和语法翻译法（GTM）在减少英语学习者写作错误方面的效果。通过比较研究发现两种教学模式在错误分析方面的有效性并不多见。本研究采用随机抽样法，共抽取了 82 个样本。本研究分为两组：实验组和对照组，前者由 41 名参与者组成，通过 RM 进行教学；后者同样由 41 名参与者组成，通过 GTM 进行教学。在 SPSS 22 的帮助下，收集并分析了测试前和测试后的处理数据。结果显示，两组学生在语气词方面都存在共同错误。此外，与 GTM 相比，RM 后期教学显著减少了各类错误的平均值。研究结果在很大程度上有助于改进 ESL 学习者的写作教学。研究结果对未来的研究方向和教学策略进行了回顾。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Theory and Practice in Language Studies

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量