Grigory Zinoviev: the torments and tosses of the oppositionist (1927-1934)

Larisa Gennad'evna Orchakova, Evgenii Yurevich Sinin
{"title":"Grigory Zinoviev: the torments and tosses of the oppositionist (1927-1934)","authors":"Larisa Gennad'evna Orchakova, Evgenii Yurevich Sinin","doi":"10.7256/2454-0609.2024.2.69722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The subject of the article is the political behavior of one of Stalin's greatest opponents, Grigory Yevseevich Zinoviev, in the period between his first expulsion from the party at the end of 1927 and his arrest on charges of Kirov's murder in December 1934. Zinoviev's letters, speeches and statements to the party leadership are analyzed, through which he tried to achieve the main goal of returning to the party and to political activity. It is established that Zinoviev has an internal struggle between public speaking and maintaining his own political attitudes. These \"torments\" and \"tosses\" caused distrust of Zinoviev from the party leaders and led the hero first to a psychological breakdown, and then to political death. The materialistic concept (in particular, historical determinism) is used as a tool. The method of psychohistory is also used to analyze the inner world of a politician and the motivation of his actions. An analysis of Zinoviev's activities as a vivid example of the political behavior of a communist oppositionist allows us to draw the following conclusions: 1) Zinoviev's behavior during the period under review was determined by his return to the party, preferably to a leadership job. The basis for achieving the goal was the recognition of the impossibility of further opposition struggle, which could lead to a split of the CPSU(b), as well as general agreement with the policy of collectivization and industrialization that had begun; 2) The content of Zinoviev's appeals to various governing bodies, including I. V. Stalin, changed according to the situation inside the party leadership. 3) The calculation was not just to return to the party and to the leadership, but to take part on Stalin's side in the fight against Bukharin. The party leadership saw this and used it for psychological breakdown. 4) It is incorrect to consider Zinoviev's political behavior as a classic \"double-dealing\". He did not conduct anti-party work and did not reject the foundations of the party line. But his behavior led at the end of 1932 to a psychological breakdown and a rejection of his own political self. Finally, Zinoviev's \"torments\" and \"throwing\" stopped at the end of 1934. He died as a politician. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the question, the introduction of unpublished Zinoviev documents into scientific circulation, consideration through one of the leaders of the party and the oppositionist of the mechanism of strengthening Stalin's personality.\n","PeriodicalId":243851,"journal":{"name":"Исторический журнал: научные исследования","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Исторический журнал: научные исследования","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0609.2024.2.69722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the article is the political behavior of one of Stalin's greatest opponents, Grigory Yevseevich Zinoviev, in the period between his first expulsion from the party at the end of 1927 and his arrest on charges of Kirov's murder in December 1934. Zinoviev's letters, speeches and statements to the party leadership are analyzed, through which he tried to achieve the main goal of returning to the party and to political activity. It is established that Zinoviev has an internal struggle between public speaking and maintaining his own political attitudes. These "torments" and "tosses" caused distrust of Zinoviev from the party leaders and led the hero first to a psychological breakdown, and then to political death. The materialistic concept (in particular, historical determinism) is used as a tool. The method of psychohistory is also used to analyze the inner world of a politician and the motivation of his actions. An analysis of Zinoviev's activities as a vivid example of the political behavior of a communist oppositionist allows us to draw the following conclusions: 1) Zinoviev's behavior during the period under review was determined by his return to the party, preferably to a leadership job. The basis for achieving the goal was the recognition of the impossibility of further opposition struggle, which could lead to a split of the CPSU(b), as well as general agreement with the policy of collectivization and industrialization that had begun; 2) The content of Zinoviev's appeals to various governing bodies, including I. V. Stalin, changed according to the situation inside the party leadership. 3) The calculation was not just to return to the party and to the leadership, but to take part on Stalin's side in the fight against Bukharin. The party leadership saw this and used it for psychological breakdown. 4) It is incorrect to consider Zinoviev's political behavior as a classic "double-dealing". He did not conduct anti-party work and did not reject the foundations of the party line. But his behavior led at the end of 1932 to a psychological breakdown and a rejection of his own political self. Finally, Zinoviev's "torments" and "throwing" stopped at the end of 1934. He died as a politician. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the question, the introduction of unpublished Zinoviev documents into scientific circulation, consideration through one of the leaders of the party and the oppositionist of the mechanism of strengthening Stalin's personality.
格里戈里-季诺维也夫:反对派的煎熬与折腾(1927-1934)
文章的主题是斯大林最大的反对者之一格里戈里-叶夫谢耶维奇-季诺维也夫从 1927 年底首次被开除党籍到 1934 年 12 月因基洛夫谋杀案被捕期间的政治行为。对季诺维也夫写给党领导层的信件、演讲和声明进行了分析,通过这些信件、演讲和声明,他试图实现重返党和政治活动的主要目标。研究证实,季诺维也夫在公开演讲和坚持自己的政治态度之间有着内心的挣扎。这些 "煎熬 "和 "折腾 "造成了党的领导人对季诺维也夫的不信任,导致主人公先是心理崩溃,后是政治死亡。唯物主义概念(尤其是历史决定论)被用作工具。心理史学的方法也被用来分析政治家的内心世界及其行为动机。季诺维也夫的活动是共产主义反对派政治行为的一个生动例子,通过对季诺维也夫活动的分析,我们可以得出以下结论:1) 季诺维也夫在本报告所述期间的行为是为了重返党内,最好是担任领导职务。2) 季诺维也夫向包括伊-瓦-斯大林在内的各领导机构发出的呼吁的内容随党领导层内部的形势而变化。3) 季诺维也夫的算盘不仅仅是回到党内和领导层,而是站在斯大林一边与布哈林作斗争。党领导层看到了这一点,并利用这一点进行心理瓦解。4) 将季诺维也夫的政治行为视为典型的 "两面派 "是不正确的。他没有进行反党工作,也没有否定党的路线基础。但他的行为在 1932 年底导致了心理崩溃和对政治自我的否定。最后,季诺维也夫的 "折磨 "和 "投掷 "在 1934 年底停止了。他作为一名政治家去世了。这篇文章在科学上的新颖之处在于它对问题的表述,将未发表的季诺维也夫文件引入科学流通领域,通过党的领导人之一和反对派对斯大林人格强化机制的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信