Mortality index is more accurate than volume in predicting outcome and failure to rescue in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing robotic right upper lobectomy

J.W. Awori Hayanga MD, MPH, Elwin Tham MD, Manuel Gomez-Tschrnko MD, J. Hunter Mehaffey MD, Jason Lamb MD, Paul Rothenberg MD, Vinay Badhwar MD, Alper Toker MD
{"title":"Mortality index is more accurate than volume in predicting outcome and failure to rescue in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing robotic right upper lobectomy","authors":"J.W. Awori Hayanga MD, MPH,&nbsp;Elwin Tham MD,&nbsp;Manuel Gomez-Tschrnko MD,&nbsp;J. Hunter Mehaffey MD,&nbsp;Jason Lamb MD,&nbsp;Paul Rothenberg MD,&nbsp;Vinay Badhwar MD,&nbsp;Alper Toker MD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjon.2024.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surgical volume is known to influence failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a complication. Robotic lung surgery continues to expand and there is variability in outcomes among hospitals. We sought to estimate the contribution of hospital-based factors on outcomes and FTR following robotic right upper lobectomy (RRUL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all patients age ≥65 years with a diagnosis of lung cancer who underwent RRUL between January 2018 and December 2020. We excluded patients who had undergone segmentectomy, sublobar, wedge, or bronchoplastic resection; had metastatic or nonmalignant disease; or had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcomes included FTR rate, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, conversion to open surgery, complications, and costs. We analyzed hospitals by tertiles of volume and Medicare Mortality Index (MMI). Defined as the institutional number of deaths per number of survivors, MMI is a marker of overall hospital performance and quality. Propensity score models were adjusted for confounding using goodness of fit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data for 4317 patients who underwent robotic right upper lobectomy were analyzed. Hospitals were categorized by volume of cases (low, &lt;9; medium, 9-20; high, &gt;20) and MMI (low, &lt;0.04; medium, 0.04-0.13; high, &gt;0.13). After propensity score balancing, patients from tertiles of lowest volume and highest MMI had higher costs ($34,222 vs $30,316; <em>P</em> = .006), as well as higher mortality (odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.67-28.2; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Compared to high-volume centers, low-volume centers had higher rates of conversion to open surgery, respiratory failure, hemorrhagic anemia, and death; longer LOS; and greater cost (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 for all). The C-statistic for volume as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.6, and the FTR was 0.8. Hospitals in the highest tertile of MMI had the highest rates of conversion to open surgery (<em>P</em> = .01), pneumothorax (<em>P</em> = .02), and respiratory failure (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). They also had the highest mortality and rate of readmission, longest LOS, and greatest costs (<em>P</em> &lt; .001 for all) and the shortest survival (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). The C-statistic for MMI as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.8, and FTR was 0.9.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The MMI incorporates hospital-based factors in the adjudication of outcomes and is a more sensitive predictor of FTR rates than volume alone. Combining MMI and volume may provide a metric that can guide quality improvement and cost-effectiveness measures in hospitals seeking to implement robotic lung surgery programs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74032,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624000342/pdfft?md5=8d8919d84ca8ba52576f17e794378b97&pid=1-s2.0-S2666273624000342-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273624000342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Surgical volume is known to influence failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a complication. Robotic lung surgery continues to expand and there is variability in outcomes among hospitals. We sought to estimate the contribution of hospital-based factors on outcomes and FTR following robotic right upper lobectomy (RRUL).

Methods

Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all patients age ≥65 years with a diagnosis of lung cancer who underwent RRUL between January 2018 and December 2020. We excluded patients who had undergone segmentectomy, sublobar, wedge, or bronchoplastic resection; had metastatic or nonmalignant disease; or had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcomes included FTR rate, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, conversion to open surgery, complications, and costs. We analyzed hospitals by tertiles of volume and Medicare Mortality Index (MMI). Defined as the institutional number of deaths per number of survivors, MMI is a marker of overall hospital performance and quality. Propensity score models were adjusted for confounding using goodness of fit.

Results

Data for 4317 patients who underwent robotic right upper lobectomy were analyzed. Hospitals were categorized by volume of cases (low, <9; medium, 9-20; high, >20) and MMI (low, <0.04; medium, 0.04-0.13; high, >0.13). After propensity score balancing, patients from tertiles of lowest volume and highest MMI had higher costs ($34,222 vs $30,316; P = .006), as well as higher mortality (odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.67-28.2; P < .001). Compared to high-volume centers, low-volume centers had higher rates of conversion to open surgery, respiratory failure, hemorrhagic anemia, and death; longer LOS; and greater cost (P < .001 for all). The C-statistic for volume as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.6, and the FTR was 0.8. Hospitals in the highest tertile of MMI had the highest rates of conversion to open surgery (P = .01), pneumothorax (P = .02), and respiratory failure (P < .001). They also had the highest mortality and rate of readmission, longest LOS, and greatest costs (P < .001 for all) and the shortest survival (P < .001). The C-statistic for MMI as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.8, and FTR was 0.9.

Conclusions

The MMI incorporates hospital-based factors in the adjudication of outcomes and is a more sensitive predictor of FTR rates than volume alone. Combining MMI and volume may provide a metric that can guide quality improvement and cost-effectiveness measures in hospitals seeking to implement robotic lung surgery programs.

在预测接受机器人右上肺叶切除术的医保受益人的结果和抢救失败率时,死亡率指数比容积更准确
背景众所周知,手术量会影响抢救失败(FTR),即并发症后的死亡。机器人肺部手术在不断扩大,而不同医院的手术结果存在差异。我们试图估算基于医院的因素对机器人右上肺叶切除术(RRUL)后的结果和 FTR 的影响。方法利用美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的住院病人报销数据库,我们对 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间所有年龄≥65 岁、诊断为肺癌并接受 RRUL 的患者进行了评估。我们排除了接受过节段切除术、亚叶切除术、楔形切除术或支气管整形切除术;患有转移性或非恶性疾病;或有新辅助化疗史的患者。主要结果包括FTR率、住院时间(LOS)、再入院率、转为开放手术率、并发症和费用。我们按照医院的手术量和医疗保险死亡率指数(MMI)对医院进行了分析。MMI 被定义为医院死亡人数与存活人数之比,是医院整体绩效和质量的标志。结果分析了4317名接受机器人右上肺叶切除术患者的数据。医院按病例量(低,9例;中,9-20例;高,20例)和MMI(低,0.04例;中,0.04-0.13例;高,0.13例)分类。经过倾向评分平衡后,手术量最低和 MMI 最高的患者的费用更高(34,222 美元 vs 30,316 美元;P = .006),死亡率也更高(几率比 7.46;95% 置信区间 2.67-28.2;P <.001)。与高容量中心相比,低容量中心的患者转为开放手术、呼吸衰竭、失血性贫血和死亡的比例更高;住院时间更长;费用更高(P 均为 0.001)。预测总死亡率的C统计量为0.6,FTR为0.8。MMI最高三分位数的医院转为开放手术(P = .01)、气胸(P = .02)和呼吸衰竭(P < .001)的比例最高。他们的死亡率和再入院率也最高,住院时间最长,费用最高(P 均为 0.001),存活时间最短(P 均为 0.001)。结论 MMI 将医院因素纳入了结果判定中,与单纯的容量相比,MMI 是更灵敏的 FTR 率预测指标。将MMI和手术量结合起来,可以为医院实施机器人肺部手术项目的质量改进和成本效益措施提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信