Co-production of knowledge and co-innovation of solutions for contaminated sediments in the Detroit and Rouge Rivers

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
John H. Hartig , Casey M. Godwin , Brianna Ellis , Jon W. Allan , Sanjiv K. Sinha , Tracy S. Hall
{"title":"Co-production of knowledge and co-innovation of solutions for contaminated sediments in the Detroit and Rouge Rivers","authors":"John H. Hartig ,&nbsp;Casey M. Godwin ,&nbsp;Brianna Ellis ,&nbsp;Jon W. Allan ,&nbsp;Sanjiv K. Sinha ,&nbsp;Tracy S. Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Contaminated sediments continue to limit ecological recovery of the Detroit and Rouge River Areas of Concern. Co-production of knowledge and co-innovation of solutions for contaminated sediments have been underway since the remedial action plan program began in 1985 and are accelerating with increased investment in remediation. In the Detroit River, up to 5.1 million m<sup>3</sup> of contaminated sediments on the U.S. side require remediation. On the Canadian side, no further sediment remediation is required beyond one completed project in Turkey Creek. An estimated 350,000 m<sup>3</sup> of contaminated sediment require remediation in the Rouge River (Michigan). Co-innovation of solutions, including collaborative funding, has estimated a $100 million shortfall in non-federal match funding necessary to secure Great Lakes Legacy Act funds. All stakeholders and rightsholders must have a sense of urgency to address this shortfall because, as of 2023,<!--> <!-->only three years remain of Legacy Act funding. If this window of opportunity is missed, there is no guarantee that comparable federal money will be available in<!--> <!-->the future. We recommend: ensuring environmental justice is a priority; completing all necessary sediment remediation in the U.S. portion of the Detroit River and lower Rouge River; recruiting partners, including the State of Michigan, to help meet necessary non-federal match requirements; exploring creative financing like environmental, social, and governance and sustainability-linked investment opportunities; and developing a compelling ecosystem vision that is carried in the hearts and minds of all watershed denizens, coupled with a complementary investment thesis to help make these watersheds more investable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 102304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000315","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contaminated sediments continue to limit ecological recovery of the Detroit and Rouge River Areas of Concern. Co-production of knowledge and co-innovation of solutions for contaminated sediments have been underway since the remedial action plan program began in 1985 and are accelerating with increased investment in remediation. In the Detroit River, up to 5.1 million m3 of contaminated sediments on the U.S. side require remediation. On the Canadian side, no further sediment remediation is required beyond one completed project in Turkey Creek. An estimated 350,000 m3 of contaminated sediment require remediation in the Rouge River (Michigan). Co-innovation of solutions, including collaborative funding, has estimated a $100 million shortfall in non-federal match funding necessary to secure Great Lakes Legacy Act funds. All stakeholders and rightsholders must have a sense of urgency to address this shortfall because, as of 2023, only three years remain of Legacy Act funding. If this window of opportunity is missed, there is no guarantee that comparable federal money will be available in the future. We recommend: ensuring environmental justice is a priority; completing all necessary sediment remediation in the U.S. portion of the Detroit River and lower Rouge River; recruiting partners, including the State of Michigan, to help meet necessary non-federal match requirements; exploring creative financing like environmental, social, and governance and sustainability-linked investment opportunities; and developing a compelling ecosystem vision that is carried in the hearts and minds of all watershed denizens, coupled with a complementary investment thesis to help make these watersheds more investable.

共同创造知识,共同创新底特律河和鲁日河污染沉积物的解决方案
受污染的沉积物继续限制着底特律河和胭脂河关注区的生态恢复。自 1985 年开始实施补救行动计划计划以来,针对受污染沉积物的知识共同生产和解决方案共同创新一直在进行,并且随着补救投资的增加而加速。在底特律河,美国一侧多达 510 万立方米的受污染沉积物需要进行修复。在加拿大一侧,除了土耳其溪的一个已完成项目外,无需再进行沉积物修复。据估计,胭脂河(密歇根州)有 35 万立方米的受污染沉积物需要修复。共同创新解决方案,包括合作筹资,估计非联邦匹配资金缺口为 1 亿美元,这是确保《大湖遗产法案》资金所必需的。所有利益相关者和权利拥有者都必须有解决这一资金短缺问题的紧迫感,因为截至 2023 年,《遗产法案》的资金仅剩三年。如果错过了这个机会之窗,就无法保证未来还能获得类似的联邦资金。我们建议:确保环境正义成为优先事项;完成底特律河美国段和胭脂河下游所有必要的沉积物修复工作;招募包括密歇根州在内的合作伙伴,帮助满足必要的非联邦匹配要求;探索创造性的融资方式,如与环境、社会、治理和可持续发展相关的投资机会;制定一个引人注目的生态系统愿景,并将其融入所有流域居民的心中,同时制定一个补充性的投资方案,帮助这些流域更具投资价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Journal of Great Lakes Research 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信