Variability in costs of electrifying passenger cars in Canada

Bassam Javed, A. Giang, M. Kandlikar
{"title":"Variability in costs of electrifying passenger cars in Canada","authors":"Bassam Javed, A. Giang, M. Kandlikar","doi":"10.1088/2634-4505/ad253e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The high cost of purchasing electric vehicles (EVs) compared to internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) is a major barrier to their widespread adoption. Additionally, the price disparity is not the same for all households. We conducted a total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis to compare the net present value of EV versus ICEV ownership for various household categories across Canada. We observed spatial and behavioral factors, including variations in costs of electricity, temperature, household archetypes and their purchase decisions, and access to charging infrastructure. We found that EVs are more cost-effective than ICEVs for certain daily driving distances, but typical households in Canada generally do not drive enough for lifecycle costs of EVs to be less than ICEVs. The province of Quebec has the most favorable conditions for EV ownership due to high purchase subsidies and low electricity prices. Variability in costs across other provinces and territories is mainly due to differences in rebates, electricity and gasoline prices, and tax rates. Our findings have implications for policymakers and consumers. For consumers comparing ICEVs to EVs based on a fixed budget, which may be consistent with how many households frame their purchase decision, willingness to accept smaller, non-luxury EVs can result in large cost savings. We also find that although temperature variation has a minimal effect on TCO, it does impact the “number of charge-ups”—a metric that we introduce to compare how many charging cycles a user may expect over the lifetime of a vehicle. The policy implication of this would be a need to consider regional differences in cold weather patterns when planning charging infrastructure deployment and the extent to which households in shared dwellings may face additional costs. Lastly, our findings strengthen the argument that equitably decarbonizing transportation will also require investment in strategies other than electrifying personal vehicles.","PeriodicalId":509119,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/ad253e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The high cost of purchasing electric vehicles (EVs) compared to internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) is a major barrier to their widespread adoption. Additionally, the price disparity is not the same for all households. We conducted a total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis to compare the net present value of EV versus ICEV ownership for various household categories across Canada. We observed spatial and behavioral factors, including variations in costs of electricity, temperature, household archetypes and their purchase decisions, and access to charging infrastructure. We found that EVs are more cost-effective than ICEVs for certain daily driving distances, but typical households in Canada generally do not drive enough for lifecycle costs of EVs to be less than ICEVs. The province of Quebec has the most favorable conditions for EV ownership due to high purchase subsidies and low electricity prices. Variability in costs across other provinces and territories is mainly due to differences in rebates, electricity and gasoline prices, and tax rates. Our findings have implications for policymakers and consumers. For consumers comparing ICEVs to EVs based on a fixed budget, which may be consistent with how many households frame their purchase decision, willingness to accept smaller, non-luxury EVs can result in large cost savings. We also find that although temperature variation has a minimal effect on TCO, it does impact the “number of charge-ups”—a metric that we introduce to compare how many charging cycles a user may expect over the lifetime of a vehicle. The policy implication of this would be a need to consider regional differences in cold weather patterns when planning charging infrastructure deployment and the extent to which households in shared dwellings may face additional costs. Lastly, our findings strengthen the argument that equitably decarbonizing transportation will also require investment in strategies other than electrifying personal vehicles.
加拿大乘用车电气化成本的差异
与内燃机汽车(ICEV)相比,购买电动汽车(EV)的高昂成本是阻碍其广泛应用的主要障碍。此外,并非所有家庭的价格差距都相同。我们进行了一项总拥有成本(TCO)分析,以比较加拿大各类家庭拥有电动汽车与内燃机汽车的净现值。我们观察了空间和行为因素,包括电力成本的变化、温度、家庭类型及其购买决策以及充电基础设施的使用情况。我们发现,在某些日常驾驶距离内,电动汽车比内燃机汽车更具成本效益,但加拿大的典型家庭一般不会驾驶足够多的电动汽车,因此电动汽车的生命周期成本低于内燃机汽车。魁北克省因其高额的购买补贴和低廉的电价,为电动汽车的拥有提供了最有利的条件。其他省份和地区的成本差异主要是由于退税、电力和汽油价格以及税率的不同造成的。我们的研究结果对政策制定者和消费者都有影响。对于根据固定预算比较内燃机汽车和电动汽车的消费者(这可能与许多家庭的购买决策框架一致)来说,愿意接受较小的非豪华电动汽车可以节省大量成本。我们还发现,虽然温度变化对总体拥有成本的影响很小,但它确实会影响 "充电次数"--我们引入了这一指标,以比较用户在车辆使用期内可能期望的充电次数。这对政策的影响是,在规划充电基础设施部署时,需要考虑寒冷天气模式的地区差异,以及合住家庭可能面临额外成本的程度。最后,我们的研究结果加强了一个论点,即公平地实现交通脱碳还需要投资于个人车辆电气化以外的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书