Quality management and competencies in forensic science

Wim Neuteboom, Alastair Ross, L. Bugeja, Sheila Willis, Claude Roux, Kevin Lothridge
{"title":"Quality management and competencies in forensic science","authors":"Wim Neuteboom, Alastair Ross, L. Bugeja, Sheila Willis, Claude Roux, Kevin Lothridge","doi":"10.1002/wfs2.1513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The competencies and attributes of forensic science professionals are a very important pillar of a Quality Management system. However, a recent international survey identified a lack of agreement on the core cognitive competencies required for working in forensic science. The survey also identified the tools for assessing competencies are not necessarily designed to measure cognitive competencies. In this Perspective, we explore further the topic of competencies and in particular, cognitive competencies and attributes with a focus on forensic science professionals. We identify the critical issue and outline a process through which we will seek the views of leaders in the field, both operational and academic, on what the required cognitive competencies and attributes are for forensic science professionals. The tools used will include a questionnaire and direct interviews. Having identified the key competencies and attributes they can then be promoted, and methods developed to assess them within the recruitment process and continuous professional development programs. We argue that further discussion on this topic is warranted as it impacts on forensic science education, training, recruitment, operations, and overall quality.This article is categorized under:\nForensic Chemistry and Trace Evidence > Presentation and Evaluation of Forensic Science Output\n","PeriodicalId":506835,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Forensic Science","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Forensic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The competencies and attributes of forensic science professionals are a very important pillar of a Quality Management system. However, a recent international survey identified a lack of agreement on the core cognitive competencies required for working in forensic science. The survey also identified the tools for assessing competencies are not necessarily designed to measure cognitive competencies. In this Perspective, we explore further the topic of competencies and in particular, cognitive competencies and attributes with a focus on forensic science professionals. We identify the critical issue and outline a process through which we will seek the views of leaders in the field, both operational and academic, on what the required cognitive competencies and attributes are for forensic science professionals. The tools used will include a questionnaire and direct interviews. Having identified the key competencies and attributes they can then be promoted, and methods developed to assess them within the recruitment process and continuous professional development programs. We argue that further discussion on this topic is warranted as it impacts on forensic science education, training, recruitment, operations, and overall quality.This article is categorized under: Forensic Chemistry and Trace Evidence > Presentation and Evaluation of Forensic Science Output
法医学的质量管理和能力
法医学专业人员的能力和素质是质量管理体系的重要支柱。然而,最近的一项国际调查发现,对从事法医学工作所需的核心认知能力缺乏共识。调查还发现,评估能力的工具并不一定是为测量认知能力而设计的。在本《视角》中,我们将进一步探讨能力这一主题,特别是认知能力和特质,重点关注法医学专业人员。我们确定了关键问题,并概述了一个过程,通过这个过程,我们将就法医学专业人员所需的认知能力和特质征求该领域业务和学术领导者的意见。使用的工具包括调查问卷和直接访谈。在确定了关键能力和特质之后,就可以对其进行推广,并制定方法在招聘过程和持续专业发展计划中对其进行评估。我们认为有必要进一步讨论这个话题,因为它对法医学教育、培训、招聘、运作和整体质量都有影响。本文分类:法医化学与痕量证据 > 法医学成果的展示与评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信