Usability of home use medical technology: The patient perspective

A. Tase, Peter Buckle, M. Ni, George B. Hanna
{"title":"Usability of home use medical technology: The patient perspective","authors":"A. Tase, Peter Buckle, M. Ni, George B. Hanna","doi":"10.1177/25160435241230143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological advancements have increased the scope and range of home-use medical devices. These have allowed development of care at home. This requires appropriate understanding of patient's needs with regards to such devices for safe use of medical technology at home and minimise usability errors. This study sought to investigate patient experiences of usability and to identify future requirements for such devices A qualitative mixed methods study was chosen. The participants were asked to complete a survey which included both multiple-choice and free-text entry questions. Participant recruitment was through purposive and snowball sampling approaches. All participants were required to have direct experience in using a medical device. Data were thematically analysed. There were 360 responses by patients, parents and carers. 503 devices were used by these participants. 99.4% used their device(s) on a daily basis. The largest group of responders were from type 1 diabetic patients. Multiple usability challenges were reported with respect to training, device interoperability, development of workarounds and the device-user interfaces. Device acceptance and their costs were also raised as issues for concern. A list of usability challenges was compiled. Patients and other end users continue to experience multiple usability challenges in the use of medical devices at home despite guidance from regulatory bodies. Better post market studies are required to generate evidence to enable the improved design and safety of the device. This should be accompanied with an evaluation of improvements in patient satisfaction and their compliance with monitoring and treatment.","PeriodicalId":508710,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435241230143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological advancements have increased the scope and range of home-use medical devices. These have allowed development of care at home. This requires appropriate understanding of patient's needs with regards to such devices for safe use of medical technology at home and minimise usability errors. This study sought to investigate patient experiences of usability and to identify future requirements for such devices A qualitative mixed methods study was chosen. The participants were asked to complete a survey which included both multiple-choice and free-text entry questions. Participant recruitment was through purposive and snowball sampling approaches. All participants were required to have direct experience in using a medical device. Data were thematically analysed. There were 360 responses by patients, parents and carers. 503 devices were used by these participants. 99.4% used their device(s) on a daily basis. The largest group of responders were from type 1 diabetic patients. Multiple usability challenges were reported with respect to training, device interoperability, development of workarounds and the device-user interfaces. Device acceptance and their costs were also raised as issues for concern. A list of usability challenges was compiled. Patients and other end users continue to experience multiple usability challenges in the use of medical devices at home despite guidance from regulatory bodies. Better post market studies are required to generate evidence to enable the improved design and safety of the device. This should be accompanied with an evaluation of improvements in patient satisfaction and their compliance with monitoring and treatment.
家用医疗技术的可用性:患者视角
技术进步扩大了家用医疗设备的范围和种类。这使得在家中进行护理成为可能。这就需要适当了解患者对此类设备的需求,以便在家中安全使用医疗技术,并将可用性错误降至最低。本研究试图调查病人对可用性的体验,并确定此类设备的未来需求。参与者需要完成一份调查问卷,其中包括多项选择题和自由文本输入题。参与者的招募采用了目的性抽样和滚雪球抽样的方法。要求所有参与者都有使用医疗设备的直接经验。对数据进行了主题分析。患者、家长和护理人员共回答了 360 个问题。这些参与者使用了 503 台设备。99.4% 的人每天都使用他们的设备。回答者中最多的是 1 型糖尿病患者。据报告,在培训、设备互操作性、变通方法的开发和设备-用户界面方面存在多种可用性挑战。设备的接受程度和成本也是值得关注的问题。我们汇编了一份可用性挑战清单。尽管有监管机构的指导,但患者和其他终端用户在家中使用医疗设备时仍然会遇到多种可用性挑战。需要更好的市场后研究来提供证据,以改进设备的设计和安全性。与此同时,还应对患者满意度的提高以及他们对监测和治疗的依从性进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信