Mapping and Assessing Cultural Ecosystem Services to Inform Maritime Spatial Planning: A Systematic Review

Heritage Pub Date : 2024-02-04 DOI:10.3390/heritage7020035
Marina Banela, Stella Sofia Kyvelou, Dimitra Kitsiou
{"title":"Mapping and Assessing Cultural Ecosystem Services to Inform Maritime Spatial Planning: A Systematic Review","authors":"Marina Banela, Stella Sofia Kyvelou, Dimitra Kitsiou","doi":"10.3390/heritage7020035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Socio-cultural dimensions and values in maritime spatial planning (MSP) are gaining momentum worldwide and especially in the European Union (EU), since it is acknowledged that they are the “missing layer” of maritime spatial plans (MSPlans). These values are partly explored through cultural ecosystem services (CES). Coastal and marine CES refer to the benefits that humans derive from the coastal and marine environments in recreational, artistic, spiritual, and educational terms. They reflect the ways in which coastal and marine ecosystems contribute to human well-being, cultural identity, and interactions with nature. The research question is how to map and assess coastal/marine ecosystem services and to integrate them in the MSPlans. Thus, this systematic review sheds light on methodological and technical issues with CES mapping and assessment and provides guidance on how to incorporate CES in MSP for future research. Publications dealing with the spatial aspects of CES were examined with an extra focus on participatory mapping approaches. Initially, 199 articles were identified, and 50 articles were ultimately eligible for the analysis. Papers were concentrated in the European Atlantic, whilst their scope was either local or regional. A large number of articles consider the contribution of CES to efficient marine management rather than to achieving an integrated and coordinated MSP. Social and mixed mapping approaches were met with the most often, especially participatory mapping approaches. Also, non-monetary valuation was prevailing, and a multitude of techniques, tools, and statistical software were used. In most of the cases, the distribution of values in relation to environmental, socio-economic, and demographic factors was examined. This article concludes that an effective integration of CES into MSP is crucial for creating prospects of a more sustainable and inclusive approach to coastal/marine planning and for the well-being of ecosystems and communities both currently and for future generations. This knowledge should become “property” of the maritime spatial planners.","PeriodicalId":507444,"journal":{"name":"Heritage","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7020035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socio-cultural dimensions and values in maritime spatial planning (MSP) are gaining momentum worldwide and especially in the European Union (EU), since it is acknowledged that they are the “missing layer” of maritime spatial plans (MSPlans). These values are partly explored through cultural ecosystem services (CES). Coastal and marine CES refer to the benefits that humans derive from the coastal and marine environments in recreational, artistic, spiritual, and educational terms. They reflect the ways in which coastal and marine ecosystems contribute to human well-being, cultural identity, and interactions with nature. The research question is how to map and assess coastal/marine ecosystem services and to integrate them in the MSPlans. Thus, this systematic review sheds light on methodological and technical issues with CES mapping and assessment and provides guidance on how to incorporate CES in MSP for future research. Publications dealing with the spatial aspects of CES were examined with an extra focus on participatory mapping approaches. Initially, 199 articles were identified, and 50 articles were ultimately eligible for the analysis. Papers were concentrated in the European Atlantic, whilst their scope was either local or regional. A large number of articles consider the contribution of CES to efficient marine management rather than to achieving an integrated and coordinated MSP. Social and mixed mapping approaches were met with the most often, especially participatory mapping approaches. Also, non-monetary valuation was prevailing, and a multitude of techniques, tools, and statistical software were used. In most of the cases, the distribution of values in relation to environmental, socio-economic, and demographic factors was examined. This article concludes that an effective integration of CES into MSP is crucial for creating prospects of a more sustainable and inclusive approach to coastal/marine planning and for the well-being of ecosystems and communities both currently and for future generations. This knowledge should become “property” of the maritime spatial planners.
绘制和评估文化生态系统服务,为海洋空间规划提供信息:系统回顾
海洋空间规划(MSP)中的社会文化因素和价值在全球范围内,尤其是在欧盟(EU),正获得越来越大的发展势头,因为它们被认为是海洋空间规划(MSPlans)中 "缺失的一层"。这些价值可通过文化生态系统服务 (CES) 得到部分发掘。沿海和海洋 CES 指的是人类从沿海和海洋环境中获得的娱乐、艺术、精神和教育方面的利益。它们反映了沿岸和海洋生态系统促进人类福祉、文化认同以及与自然互动的方式。研究的问题是如何绘制和评估沿岸/海洋生态系统服务,并将其纳入海洋保护计划。因此,本系统综述揭示了绘制和评估沿海/海洋生态系统服务的方法和技术问题,并就如何将沿海/海洋生态系统服务纳入未来研究提供了指导。本系统综述研究了涉及生态系统服务补偿空间方面的出版物,并特别关注了参与式制图方法。初步确定了 199 篇文章,最终有 50 篇符合分析条件。文章主要集中在欧洲大西洋地区,其研究范围要么是地方性的,要么是区域性的。大量文章考虑了 CES 对高效海洋管理的贡献,而不是对实现综合协调的 MSP 的贡献。最常见的是社会和混合测绘方法,特别是参与式测绘方法。此外,非货币估值也很普遍,并使用了多种技术、工具和统计软件。在大多数情况下,对与环境、社会经济和人口因素相关的价值分布进行了研究。本文的结论是,将生态系统服务补偿有效地纳入可持续发展战略计划,对于以更具可持续性和包容性的方法进行沿海/海洋规划,以及为当前和子孙后代的生态系统和社区的福祉创造前景至关重要。这些知识应成为海洋空间规划人员的 "财产"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信