Industry Sponsorship in Dentistry: An Ethics Scoping Review

Jeffrey Gruenglas, Roxana Menes, Lori Rainchuso
{"title":"Industry Sponsorship in Dentistry: An Ethics Scoping Review","authors":"Jeffrey Gruenglas, Roxana Menes, Lori Rainchuso","doi":"10.22461/jhea.1.71642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence to guide dentistry on conflict of interest (COI) and professional-industry relationships is limited. To determine the breadth of literature regarding ethics in dentistry and COI relating to sponsorship. A scoping review following the PRISMA extension was performed. Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were used to identify peer-reviewed sources, published 2013-2023. Titles, abstracts, and full-text reviews were conducted by two independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The remaining studies underwent critical appraisal. Key findings were extracted and analyzed. Adjusted for critical appraisal thresholds, we evaluated a total of (n=9) studies associated with dentistry, COI, and sponsorship (industry and non-profit research funding). The majority of evidence demonstrated a significant correlation with disclosure of COI and professional ethical conflict. More than 32% of publications demonstrated no clear disclosure or failed to report COI. Sponsored studies demonstrated significantly greater scrutiny of disclosure practices, whereas industry/dentist-reported payments were prevalent but varied widely (19% to 62%). Regardless of funding or influence, dental professionals are likely to disclose industry conflicts when presented with policies to guide transparency, thus strengthening patient trust and professional code of ethics.","PeriodicalId":164934,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Healthcare Ethics & Administration","volume":"66 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Healthcare Ethics & Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22461/jhea.1.71642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence to guide dentistry on conflict of interest (COI) and professional-industry relationships is limited. To determine the breadth of literature regarding ethics in dentistry and COI relating to sponsorship. A scoping review following the PRISMA extension was performed. Medline/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were used to identify peer-reviewed sources, published 2013-2023. Titles, abstracts, and full-text reviews were conducted by two independent reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. The remaining studies underwent critical appraisal. Key findings were extracted and analyzed. Adjusted for critical appraisal thresholds, we evaluated a total of (n=9) studies associated with dentistry, COI, and sponsorship (industry and non-profit research funding). The majority of evidence demonstrated a significant correlation with disclosure of COI and professional ethical conflict. More than 32% of publications demonstrated no clear disclosure or failed to report COI. Sponsored studies demonstrated significantly greater scrutiny of disclosure practices, whereas industry/dentist-reported payments were prevalent but varied widely (19% to 62%). Regardless of funding or influence, dental professionals are likely to disclose industry conflicts when presented with policies to guide transparency, thus strengthening patient trust and professional code of ethics.
牙科行业赞助:伦理范围审查
就利益冲突 (COI) 和专业行业关系为牙科提供指导的证据非常有限。确定有关牙科职业道德和与赞助相关的 COI 的文献的广度。按照 PRISMA 扩展标准进行了范围界定综述。使用 Medline/PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库来确定 2013-2023 年出版的同行评审资料。标题、摘要和全文由两名独立审稿人进行审阅。意见不一致时,以协商一致的方式解决。其余研究进行了批判性评估。提取并分析了主要研究结果。根据关键性评价阈值进行调整后,我们共评估了(n=9)项与牙科、COI 和赞助(行业和非营利性研究资金)相关的研究。大多数证据表明,披露主要利益相关者和职业道德冲突之间存在显著相关性。超过 32% 的出版物未明确披露或未报告 COI。有赞助的研究对披露做法的审查明显更严格,而行业/牙医报告的付款情况很普遍,但差异很大(19% 到 62%)。无论资金来源或影响力如何,牙科专业人士在获得指导透明度的政策后都有可能披露行业冲突,从而加强患者的信任和职业道德规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信