Enhancement of teaching and learning quality through assessment for learning: a case in chemical engineering

Tiprawee Tongtummachat, A. Jaree, Nattee Akkarawatkhoosith
{"title":"Enhancement of teaching and learning quality through assessment for learning: a case in chemical engineering","authors":"Tiprawee Tongtummachat, A. Jaree, Nattee Akkarawatkhoosith","doi":"10.1108/jrit-09-2023-0137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article presents our experience in implementing the assessment for learning process (AfL) to enhance the teaching–learning quality, which has faced numerous challenges impacting educational quality. The effectiveness of this technique is demonstrated through a case study conducted in a core course of chemical engineering.Design/methodology/approachThe article shares insights into the systematic course design and planning processes that were discussed and developed through AfL practices. Significant emphasis is placed on implementing formative and summative student self-assessment surveys as simple yet effective methods to meet this purpose. Quantitative data were collected and analyzed over three consecutive academic years (2020–2022) using various statistical parameters such as percentage, interquartile range and the program’s numerical goal (%G).FindingsThe AfL process via formative and summative surveys could significantly and effectively improve teaching–learning quality. These findings assist educators in identifying appropriate teaching methods and recognizing areas of weakness and strength, thereby facilitating continuous improvement in the teaching–learning quality. Validation methods, including quizzes and numerical grades, were employed to practically verify the outcome obtained from the questionnaires.Practical implicationsThe AfL techniques demonstrated in this study can be directly implemented or adapted for various educational fields to enhance the teaching–learning quality.Originality/valueThe practical implementation of AfL in an engineering context has hardly been reported, particularly in chemical engineering. This work represents the practical implementation of AfL to enhance engineering field education.","PeriodicalId":244951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","volume":"383 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-09-2023-0137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis article presents our experience in implementing the assessment for learning process (AfL) to enhance the teaching–learning quality, which has faced numerous challenges impacting educational quality. The effectiveness of this technique is demonstrated through a case study conducted in a core course of chemical engineering.Design/methodology/approachThe article shares insights into the systematic course design and planning processes that were discussed and developed through AfL practices. Significant emphasis is placed on implementing formative and summative student self-assessment surveys as simple yet effective methods to meet this purpose. Quantitative data were collected and analyzed over three consecutive academic years (2020–2022) using various statistical parameters such as percentage, interquartile range and the program’s numerical goal (%G).FindingsThe AfL process via formative and summative surveys could significantly and effectively improve teaching–learning quality. These findings assist educators in identifying appropriate teaching methods and recognizing areas of weakness and strength, thereby facilitating continuous improvement in the teaching–learning quality. Validation methods, including quizzes and numerical grades, were employed to practically verify the outcome obtained from the questionnaires.Practical implicationsThe AfL techniques demonstrated in this study can be directly implemented or adapted for various educational fields to enhance the teaching–learning quality.Originality/valueThe practical implementation of AfL in an engineering context has hardly been reported, particularly in chemical engineering. This work represents the practical implementation of AfL to enhance engineering field education.
通过学习评估提高教学质量:化学工程案例
目的 本文介绍了我们在实施学习过程评估(AfL)以提高教学质量方面的经验。通过对化学工程专业核心课程的案例研究,证明了这一技术的有效性。设计/方法/途径本文分享了对系统课程设计和规划流程的见解,这些流程是通过 AfL 实践讨论和开发的。文章着重强调了实施形成性和总结性学生自我评估调查,将其作为实现这一目的的简单而有效的方法。连续三个学年(2020-2022 年)的定量数据收集和分析采用了各种统计参数,如百分比、四分位数间范围和计划的数字目标(%G)。这些调查结果有助于教育工作者确定适当的教学方法,认识到薄弱环节和优势领域,从而促进教学质量的不断提高。本研究中展示的 AfL 技术可直接应用或适用于不同的教育领域,以提高教学质量。这项工作体现了在工程领域教育中实际应用 AfL 的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信