Exploring the correlation between radial artery access and decreased occurrence of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Syed Kashif ur Rahman, Muhammad Abbas Khan, Muzafar Ali Surhio, Ghulam Mahdi Jamro, Mashooque Ali Dasti, Mahmood Ul Hassan
{"title":"Exploring the correlation between radial artery access and decreased occurrence of contrast-induced nephropathy.","authors":"Syed Kashif ur Rahman, Muhammad Abbas Khan, Muzafar Ali Surhio, Ghulam Mahdi Jamro, Mashooque Ali Dasti, Mahmood Ul Hassan","doi":"10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.02.7898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To Investigate the Impact of Radial Artery Access on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Incidence. Study Design:                Retrospective study. Setting: Department of Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Complex in Peshawar. Period: January 2021 to June 2022. Material & Methods: Patients aged ≥ 30 who have undergone cardiac catheterization procedures, with a focus on those who have undergone the procedure using radial artery access. Those patients who had pre-existing renal impairments or kidney diseases, with a history of contrast allergies, were included in the study. However, those patients who were under the age of < 30, had undergone cardiac catheterization procedures using femoral artery access, and with incomplete medical records were excluded. All the data were analyzed in SPSS version 26. Results: In our study involving 164 participants. Individuals who experienced CIN exhibited a considerably greater average age of 69.89 years when contrasted with the 66.86 years of those in the non-CIN category (p=0.03). Furthermore, a higher percentage of patients in the CIN group were aged 65 or older (35.1% vs. 11%, p<0.001), highlighting the increased vulnerability of older individuals to CIN. The timing of reperfusion therapy, indicated by the time-to-reperfusion, was significantly longer in the CIN group (6.2 ± 3.3 hours) compared to the non-CIN group (4.9 ± 3.7 hours, p=0.001), suggesting that delayed reperfusion may be a risk factor for CIN. Conclusion: Patients with anterior infarction, delayed reperfusion, lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and higher serum creatinine levels were also more likely to develop CIN.","PeriodicalId":22991,"journal":{"name":"The professional medical journal","volume":"58 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The professional medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2024.31.02.7898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To Investigate the Impact of Radial Artery Access on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Incidence. Study Design:                Retrospective study. Setting: Department of Cardiology, Hayatabad Medical Complex in Peshawar. Period: January 2021 to June 2022. Material & Methods: Patients aged ≥ 30 who have undergone cardiac catheterization procedures, with a focus on those who have undergone the procedure using radial artery access. Those patients who had pre-existing renal impairments or kidney diseases, with a history of contrast allergies, were included in the study. However, those patients who were under the age of < 30, had undergone cardiac catheterization procedures using femoral artery access, and with incomplete medical records were excluded. All the data were analyzed in SPSS version 26. Results: In our study involving 164 participants. Individuals who experienced CIN exhibited a considerably greater average age of 69.89 years when contrasted with the 66.86 years of those in the non-CIN category (p=0.03). Furthermore, a higher percentage of patients in the CIN group were aged 65 or older (35.1% vs. 11%, p<0.001), highlighting the increased vulnerability of older individuals to CIN. The timing of reperfusion therapy, indicated by the time-to-reperfusion, was significantly longer in the CIN group (6.2 ± 3.3 hours) compared to the non-CIN group (4.9 ± 3.7 hours, p=0.001), suggesting that delayed reperfusion may be a risk factor for CIN. Conclusion: Patients with anterior infarction, delayed reperfusion, lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and higher serum creatinine levels were also more likely to develop CIN.
探索桡动脉通路与造影剂诱发肾病发生率降低之间的相关性。
目的调查桡动脉入路对造影剂诱发肾病 (CIN) 发生率的影响。研究设计: 回顾性研究。研究地点白沙瓦哈亚塔巴德医疗中心心脏病科。时间: 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月。材料与方法:年龄≥ 30 岁、接受过心导管手术的患者,重点是使用桡动脉入路进行手术的患者。研究对象包括原有肾功能损害或肾脏疾病、有造影剂过敏史的患者。然而,年龄小于 30 岁、使用股动脉通路进行过心导管手术以及医疗记录不完整的患者被排除在外。所有数据均在 SPSS 26 版本中进行分析。结果我们的研究涉及 164 名参与者。经历过 CIN 的患者平均年龄为 69.89 岁,而非 CIN 患者的平均年龄为 66.86 岁(P=0.03)。此外,CIN 组中 65 岁或以上的患者比例更高(35.1% 对 11%,P<0.001),这说明老年人更容易受到 CIN 的影响。与非 CIN 组(4.9 ± 3.7 小时,P=0.001)相比,CIN 组患者的再灌注治疗时间(以再灌注时间表示)明显更长(6.2 ± 3.3 小时),这表明再灌注延迟可能是导致 CIN 的一个风险因素。结论前梗死、再灌注延迟、左心室射血分数(LVEF)较低和血清肌酐水平较高的患者也更有可能发生 CIN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信