Enhancing Attraction and Aggregation of Desert Locusts for Efficient Harvesting: Push‐Pull Approach

Joseph Odhiambo Aguk, Collins Kalwale Mweresa, M. Ayieko
{"title":"Enhancing Attraction and Aggregation of Desert Locusts for Efficient Harvesting: Push‐Pull Approach","authors":"Joseph Odhiambo Aguk, Collins Kalwale Mweresa, M. Ayieko","doi":"10.1002/appl.202300108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Desert locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) pause a significant threat to food security. However, they also serve as a nutrient‐rich delicacy in many African and Arabic communities where they are traditionally harvested for food and feed. Traditional harvesting methods are inefficient, laborious and time‐consuming hence, the need to explore more convenient and efficient techniques. This study assessed preferential selection and feeding behavior of desert locusts to identify trap plants that could attract and aggregate them for easy harvesting. Four trap plants (cowpea, finger millet, sorghum, and amaranth) and four repellent plants (neem, pencil cactus, garlic, and cayenne red pepper) were evaluated through multiple‐choice experiments. A randomized complete block design (RCBD), mature adult, immature adult and hopper stages of desert locust were involved. ANOVA was used to determine effects of repellent and trap plants on feeding preferences of desert locusts. Mean differences between treatments at p<0.05 were separated using post‐hoc Tukey HSD. Cowpea as the most preferred trap plant attracted 62.7%, 70.7% and 76.9% of mature adult, immature adult and hopper locust stages, respectively. Neem exhibited the most potent repellent effect and attracted no desert locust for feeding. Neem repelled locusts thereby reducing infestation and damage of cowpea as a pull plant when both plants were grown in the same pot in a \"push‐pull\" system. The push‐pull attracted 3.7%, 24.3% and 7.8% of mature adult, immature adult and hopper locust stages, respectively. However, cowpea attracted large numbers of locusts (96.3% mature adults, 75.7% immature adults and 92.2% hoppers) when grown separately from neem. These findings provide valuable insights on the potential of exploiting trap and repellents to enhance aggregation and harvesting of desert locusts as food and feed.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":503210,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research","volume":"44 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/appl.202300108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Desert locusts (Schistocerca gregaria) pause a significant threat to food security. However, they also serve as a nutrient‐rich delicacy in many African and Arabic communities where they are traditionally harvested for food and feed. Traditional harvesting methods are inefficient, laborious and time‐consuming hence, the need to explore more convenient and efficient techniques. This study assessed preferential selection and feeding behavior of desert locusts to identify trap plants that could attract and aggregate them for easy harvesting. Four trap plants (cowpea, finger millet, sorghum, and amaranth) and four repellent plants (neem, pencil cactus, garlic, and cayenne red pepper) were evaluated through multiple‐choice experiments. A randomized complete block design (RCBD), mature adult, immature adult and hopper stages of desert locust were involved. ANOVA was used to determine effects of repellent and trap plants on feeding preferences of desert locusts. Mean differences between treatments at p<0.05 were separated using post‐hoc Tukey HSD. Cowpea as the most preferred trap plant attracted 62.7%, 70.7% and 76.9% of mature adult, immature adult and hopper locust stages, respectively. Neem exhibited the most potent repellent effect and attracted no desert locust for feeding. Neem repelled locusts thereby reducing infestation and damage of cowpea as a pull plant when both plants were grown in the same pot in a "push‐pull" system. The push‐pull attracted 3.7%, 24.3% and 7.8% of mature adult, immature adult and hopper locust stages, respectively. However, cowpea attracted large numbers of locusts (96.3% mature adults, 75.7% immature adults and 92.2% hoppers) when grown separately from neem. These findings provide valuable insights on the potential of exploiting trap and repellents to enhance aggregation and harvesting of desert locusts as food and feed.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
增强沙漠蝗虫的吸引力和聚集能力,以实现高效收获:推拉法
沙漠蝗虫(Schistocerca gregaria)对粮食安全构成严重威胁。然而,在许多非洲和阿拉伯社区,它们也是一种营养丰富的美味佳肴,那里的人们历来将其作为食物和饲料来收获。传统的收获方法效率低、费力、费时,因此需要探索更方便、更高效的技术。本研究对沙漠蝗虫的优先选择和取食行为进行了评估,以确定哪些诱捕植物可以吸引和聚集沙漠蝗虫,从而方便收割。通过多项选择实验对四种诱捕植物(豇豆、小米、高粱和苋菜)和四种驱避植物(印楝、笔仙、大蒜和辣椒红椒)进行了评估。实验采用随机完全区组设计(RCBD),涉及沙漠蝗的成熟成虫期、未成熟成虫期和跳虫期。采用方差分析确定驱虫剂和诱捕植物对沙漠蝗取食偏好的影响。采用事后Tukey HSD法对处理间的均值差异(P<0.05)进行分离。豇豆作为最受欢迎的诱捕植物,分别吸引了 62.7%、70.7% 和 76.9%的成熟成虫、未成熟成虫和跳蝻。楝树的驱虫效果最强,没有吸引沙漠蝗取食。在 "推拉 "系统中,当豇豆和印度楝种植在同一个花盆中时,印度楝能驱赶蝗虫,从而减少了豇豆作为牵引植物的侵扰和损害。推拉法分别吸引了 3.7%、24.3% 和 7.8%的成熟成虫、未成熟成虫和跳蝻。然而,当豇豆与印楝分开种植时,豇豆吸引了大量蝗虫(96.3%的成熟成虫、75.7%的未成熟成虫和 92.2%的蝗虫)。这些发现为利用诱捕剂和驱避剂提高沙漠蝗虫的聚集和作为食物和饲料的收获提供了有价值的见解。本文受版权保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信