Do reliable big and cloud data analytics capabilities in manufacturing firms' supply chain boosting unique comparative advantage? A moderated-mediation model of data-driven competitive sustainability, green product innovation and green process innovation at North Africa region

M. Al-Shboul
{"title":"Do reliable big and cloud data analytics capabilities in manufacturing firms' supply chain boosting unique comparative advantage? A moderated-mediation model of data-driven competitive sustainability, green product innovation and green process innovation at North Africa region","authors":"M. Al-Shboul","doi":"10.1108/ijppm-09-2023-0455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study attempts to explore the linkages between reliable big and cloud data analytics capabilities (RB&CDACs) and the comparative advantage (CA) that applies in the manufacturing sector in the countries located in North Africa (NA). These are considered developing countries through generating green product innovation (GPI) and using green process innovations (GPrLs) in their processes and functions as mediating factors, as well as the moderating role of data-driven competitive sustainability (DDCS).Design/methodology/approachTo achieve the aim of this study, 346 useable surveys out of 1,601 were analyzed, and valid responses were retrieved for analysis, representing a 21.6% response rate by applying the quantitative methodology for collecting primary data. Convergent validity and discriminant validity tests were applied to structural equation modeling (SEM) in the CB-covariance-based structural equation modeling (SEM) program, and the data reliability was confirmed. Additionally, a multivariate analysis technique was used via CB-SEM, as hypothesized relationships were evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and then the hypotheses were tested through a structural model. Further, a bootstrapping technique was used to analyze the data. We included GPI and GPrI as mediating factors, while using DDCS as a moderated factor.FindingsThe empirical findings indicated that the proposed moderated-mediation model was accepted due to the relationships between the constructs being statistically significant. Further, the findings showed that there is a significant positive effect in the relationship between reliable BCDA capabilities and CAs as well as a mediating effect of GPI and GPrI, which is supported by the proposed formulated hypothesis. Additionally, the findings confirmed that there is a moderating effect represented by data-driven competitive advantage suitability between GPI, GPrI and CA.Research limitations/implicationsOne of the main limitations of this study is that an applied cross-sectional study provides a snapshot at a given moment in time. Furthermore, it used only one type of methodological approach (i.e. quantitative) rather than using mixed methods to reach more accurate data.Originality/valueThis study developed a theoretical model that is obtained from reliable BCDA capabilities, CA, DDCS, green innovation and GPrI. Thus, this piece of work bridges the existing research gap in the literature by testing the moderated-mediation model with a focus on the manufacturing sector that benefits from big data analytics capabilities to improve levels of GPI and competitive advantage. Finally, this study is considered a road map and gaudiness for the importance of applying these factors, which offers new valuable information and findings for managers, practitioners and decision-makers in the manufacturing sector in the NA region.","PeriodicalId":503012,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-09-2023-0455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study attempts to explore the linkages between reliable big and cloud data analytics capabilities (RB&CDACs) and the comparative advantage (CA) that applies in the manufacturing sector in the countries located in North Africa (NA). These are considered developing countries through generating green product innovation (GPI) and using green process innovations (GPrLs) in their processes and functions as mediating factors, as well as the moderating role of data-driven competitive sustainability (DDCS).Design/methodology/approachTo achieve the aim of this study, 346 useable surveys out of 1,601 were analyzed, and valid responses were retrieved for analysis, representing a 21.6% response rate by applying the quantitative methodology for collecting primary data. Convergent validity and discriminant validity tests were applied to structural equation modeling (SEM) in the CB-covariance-based structural equation modeling (SEM) program, and the data reliability was confirmed. Additionally, a multivariate analysis technique was used via CB-SEM, as hypothesized relationships were evaluated through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and then the hypotheses were tested through a structural model. Further, a bootstrapping technique was used to analyze the data. We included GPI and GPrI as mediating factors, while using DDCS as a moderated factor.FindingsThe empirical findings indicated that the proposed moderated-mediation model was accepted due to the relationships between the constructs being statistically significant. Further, the findings showed that there is a significant positive effect in the relationship between reliable BCDA capabilities and CAs as well as a mediating effect of GPI and GPrI, which is supported by the proposed formulated hypothesis. Additionally, the findings confirmed that there is a moderating effect represented by data-driven competitive advantage suitability between GPI, GPrI and CA.Research limitations/implicationsOne of the main limitations of this study is that an applied cross-sectional study provides a snapshot at a given moment in time. Furthermore, it used only one type of methodological approach (i.e. quantitative) rather than using mixed methods to reach more accurate data.Originality/valueThis study developed a theoretical model that is obtained from reliable BCDA capabilities, CA, DDCS, green innovation and GPrI. Thus, this piece of work bridges the existing research gap in the literature by testing the moderated-mediation model with a focus on the manufacturing sector that benefits from big data analytics capabilities to improve levels of GPI and competitive advantage. Finally, this study is considered a road map and gaudiness for the importance of applying these factors, which offers new valuable information and findings for managers, practitioners and decision-makers in the manufacturing sector in the NA region.
制造企业供应链中可靠的大数据和云数据分析能力能否提升独特的比较优势?北非地区数据驱动的竞争可持续性、绿色产品创新和绿色流程创新的中介模型
目的 本研究试图探讨可靠的大数据和云数据分析能力(RB&CDACs)与北非国家制造业比较优势(CA)之间的联系。这些国家被认为是发展中国家,通过在其流程和功能中产生绿色产品创新(GPI)和使用绿色流程创新(GPrLs)作为中介因素,以及数据驱动的可持续竞争性(DDCS)的调节作用来实现本研究的目的。在基于 CB 协方差的结构方程模型(SEM)程序中,对结构方程模型(SEM)进行了收敛效度和判别效度检验,并确认了数据的可靠性。此外,还通过 CB-SEM 使用了多元分析技术,通过确证因子分析(CFA)评估假设关系,然后通过结构模型检验假设。此外,我们还使用了引导技术来分析数据。我们将 GPI 和 GPrI 作为中介因子,同时将 DDCS 作为调节因子。研究结果实证研究结果表明,由于构念之间的关系在统计学上具有显著性,因此所提出的调节-中介模型被接受。此外,研究结果表明,可靠的 BCDA 能力与 CA 之间存在明显的正效应,GPI 和 GPrI 也存在中介效应,这得到了提出的假设的支持。此外,研究结果还证实,在 GPI、GPrI 和 CA 之间存在以数据驱动的竞争优势适宜性为代表的调节效应。研究局限性/启示本研究的主要局限性之一是,应用横截面研究提供了特定时间点的快照。此外,本研究只使用了一种方法(即定量方法),而没有使用混合方法来获得更准确的数据。原创性/价值本研究开发了一个理论模型,该模型从可靠的 BCDA 能力、CA、DDCS、绿色创新和 GPrI 中获得。因此,这项工作通过测试调节中介模型,弥补了现有文献中的研究空白,重点研究了制造业从大数据分析能力中获益的情况,以提高 GPI 水平和竞争优势。最后,本研究为应用这些因素的重要性提供了路线图和启示,为北美地区制造业的管理者、从业人员和决策者提供了新的有价值的信息和发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信