Short-term healthcare resource utilization associated with receipt of CDC-informed opioid thresholds among commercially insured new chronic opioid users

Q3 Medicine
Martin J. Calabrese, F. Shaya, Francis Palumbo, M. Mcpherson, Ester Villalonga-Olives, Z. Zafari, Ryan Mutter
{"title":"Short-term healthcare resource utilization associated with receipt of CDC-informed opioid thresholds among commercially insured new chronic opioid users","authors":"Martin J. Calabrese, F. Shaya, Francis Palumbo, M. Mcpherson, Ester Villalonga-Olives, Z. Zafari, Ryan Mutter","doi":"10.5055/jom.0848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the impact of recent changes to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) morphine milligram equivalent (MME)/day threshold recommendations on healthcare utilization. \nDesign: A retrospective cohort study of new chronic opioid users (NCOUs). \nSetting: Commercially insured plans across the United States using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics database with new use between January 2014 and March 2015. \nPatients: NCOUs with ≥60-day coverage of opioids within a 90-day period with ≥30-day opioid-free period prior to the date of the first qualifying opioid prescription. \nInterventions: NCOU categorized by the CDC three-tiered risk-based average MME/day thresholds: low (>0 to <50), medium (≥50 to <90), and high (≥90). \nMain outcome measures: Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds of incurring an acute care encounter (ACE) (all-cause and opioid related) between the thresholds (adjusted odds, 95 percent confidence interval). \nResults: In adjusted analyses, when compared to low threshold, there was no difference in the odds of all-cause ACE across the medium (1.01, 0.94-1.28) and high (1.01, 0.84-1.22) thresholds. When compared to low threshold, a statistically insignificant increase was observed when evaluating opioid-related ACE among medium (1.86, 0.86-4.02) and high (1.51, 0.65-3.52) thresholds. \nConclusions: There was no difference in odds of an all-cause or opioid-related ACE associated with the thresholds. Early-intervention programs and policies exploring reduction of MME/day among NCOUs may not result in short-term reduction in all-cause or opioid-related ACEs. Further assessment of potential long-term reduction in ACEs among this cohort may be insightful. \n ","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of recent changes to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) morphine milligram equivalent (MME)/day threshold recommendations on healthcare utilization. Design: A retrospective cohort study of new chronic opioid users (NCOUs). Setting: Commercially insured plans across the United States using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics database with new use between January 2014 and March 2015. Patients: NCOUs with ≥60-day coverage of opioids within a 90-day period with ≥30-day opioid-free period prior to the date of the first qualifying opioid prescription. Interventions: NCOU categorized by the CDC three-tiered risk-based average MME/day thresholds: low (>0 to <50), medium (≥50 to <90), and high (≥90). Main outcome measures: Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds of incurring an acute care encounter (ACE) (all-cause and opioid related) between the thresholds (adjusted odds, 95 percent confidence interval). Results: In adjusted analyses, when compared to low threshold, there was no difference in the odds of all-cause ACE across the medium (1.01, 0.94-1.28) and high (1.01, 0.84-1.22) thresholds. When compared to low threshold, a statistically insignificant increase was observed when evaluating opioid-related ACE among medium (1.86, 0.86-4.02) and high (1.51, 0.65-3.52) thresholds. Conclusions: There was no difference in odds of an all-cause or opioid-related ACE associated with the thresholds. Early-intervention programs and policies exploring reduction of MME/day among NCOUs may not result in short-term reduction in all-cause or opioid-related ACEs. Further assessment of potential long-term reduction in ACEs among this cohort may be insightful.  
商业保险新慢性阿片类药物使用者接受疾病预防控制中心提供的阿片类药物阈值后的短期医疗资源利用情况
目的:评估美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)吗啡毫克当量(MME)/天阈值建议的最新变化对医疗保健使用的影响。设计:对新的慢性阿片类药物使用者(NCOUs)进行回顾性队列研究。地点:美国使用 IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus for Academics 数据库的全美商业保险计划,2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 3 月期间的新增使用情况。患者:在首次开具合格阿片类药物处方日期之前的 90 天内,阿片类药物投保期≥60 天且无阿片类药物投保期≥30 天的 NCOU。干预措施:按疾病预防控制中心基于风险的三级平均 MME/天阈值对 NCOU 进行分类:低(>0 至 <50)、中(≥50 至 <90)和高(≥90)。主要结果测量:采用多变量逻辑回归法计算不同阈值之间发生急性护理事件(ACE)(全因和阿片类药物相关)的调整后几率(调整后几率,95% 置信区间)。结果:在调整分析中,与低阈值相比,中阈值(1.01,0.94-1.28)和高阈值(1.01,0.84-1.22)发生全因急性护理事件的几率没有差异。与低阈值相比,中阈值(1.86,0.86-4.02)和高阈值(1.51,0.65-3.52)在评估阿片类药物相关的 ACE 时,观察到了统计学上不显著的增加。结论与阈值相关的全因或阿片类药物相关的ACE几率没有差异。早期干预计划和政策探索减少 NCOU 的 MME/天数可能不会在短期内减少全因或阿片类药物相关的 ACE。进一步评估该群体中 ACE 的长期减少潜力可能会有所启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信