Fernando A. M. Herbella, V. Velanovich, Brant Oelschlager, Shahin Ayazi, Sven Eriksson, Blair Jobe, Renato Salvador, Ory Wiesel, F. Schlottmann, Marco G. Patti, Italo Braghetto, Atilla Dubecz, Anne Lidor, Donald E. Low
{"title":"Sliding and Paraesophageal Hiatal Hernias are Distinct Diseases: Surgeons are Responsible for Delineating the Differences","authors":"Fernando A. M. Herbella, V. Velanovich, Brant Oelschlager, Shahin Ayazi, Sven Eriksson, Blair Jobe, Renato Salvador, Ory Wiesel, F. Schlottmann, Marco G. Patti, Italo Braghetto, Atilla Dubecz, Anne Lidor, Donald E. Low","doi":"10.1177/26345161241231765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outcomes for sliding and paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PHH) are jointly reported. By combining outcomes of sliding hernia and PHH repair, surgeons are conflating the outcomes of surgical management for GERD with the outcomes of PHH repair. PHH is a distinct clinical entity from sliding hernia, requiring a more complex operation with higher risk of complications and, ultimately, comparatively diminished outcomes. The practice of combining PHH and sliding hernia surgical data confounds the true outcomes of ARS and contributes to misconceptions that reduce referral rates. Current and future research assessments must be based on accurate discrimination between the 2 anatomic presentations. Surgeons have a responsibility to ensure this distinction is clearly drawn when disseminating their ARS outcomes.","PeriodicalId":508891,"journal":{"name":"Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society","volume":"284 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161241231765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The outcomes for sliding and paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PHH) are jointly reported. By combining outcomes of sliding hernia and PHH repair, surgeons are conflating the outcomes of surgical management for GERD with the outcomes of PHH repair. PHH is a distinct clinical entity from sliding hernia, requiring a more complex operation with higher risk of complications and, ultimately, comparatively diminished outcomes. The practice of combining PHH and sliding hernia surgical data confounds the true outcomes of ARS and contributes to misconceptions that reduce referral rates. Current and future research assessments must be based on accurate discrimination between the 2 anatomic presentations. Surgeons have a responsibility to ensure this distinction is clearly drawn when disseminating their ARS outcomes.