Authorship and re-equilibration of the dynamics in the fashion industry: can the DSM Directive be the leader of a new regime for designers?

Spyridon Sipetas
{"title":"Authorship and re-equilibration of the dynamics in the fashion industry: can the DSM Directive be the leader of a new regime for designers?","authors":"Spyridon Sipetas","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fashion designers’ persistent struggle to establish their author status is marked not only by external discrimination but also by internal industry biases. Historically, the alleged cultural elitism of copyright law has been the main hurdle for granting them this title. However, recent rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union have dismantled any meaningful margin for discriminatory treatment across different art forms. With the clear acknowledgement of fashion designs as copyright-protectable subject matter, fashion designers can now proudly wear the badge of ‘authors’. But what does this newfound title bear, in practice, in a sector where authorship is built on an unjust foundation, on the grounds of the fashion industry’s discreditable hierarchy? What is the current fate of their moral and economic rights and how can the mechanisms provided to authors by Directive 2019/790 (DSM Directive) be leveraged to re-equilibrate the dynamics of the industry? These are, inter alia, the questions this article—ambitiously—attempts to explore.","PeriodicalId":508706,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpae014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fashion designers’ persistent struggle to establish their author status is marked not only by external discrimination but also by internal industry biases. Historically, the alleged cultural elitism of copyright law has been the main hurdle for granting them this title. However, recent rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union have dismantled any meaningful margin for discriminatory treatment across different art forms. With the clear acknowledgement of fashion designs as copyright-protectable subject matter, fashion designers can now proudly wear the badge of ‘authors’. But what does this newfound title bear, in practice, in a sector where authorship is built on an unjust foundation, on the grounds of the fashion industry’s discreditable hierarchy? What is the current fate of their moral and economic rights and how can the mechanisms provided to authors by Directive 2019/790 (DSM Directive) be leveraged to re-equilibrate the dynamics of the industry? These are, inter alia, the questions this article—ambitiously—attempts to explore.
时装业的作者身份和动态再平衡:DSM 指令能否成为设计师新制度的领导者?
时装设计师为确立自己的作者地位而进行的不懈努力不仅受到外部歧视,还受到行业内部偏见的影响。从历史上看,版权法中所谓的文化精英主义一直是授予他们这一头衔的主要障碍。然而,欧盟法院最近的裁决打破了不同艺术形式之间任何有意义的歧视性待遇。随着时装设计被明确认定为受版权保护的主题,时装设计师现在可以自豪地戴上 "作者 "的徽章了。但是,在一个作者身份建立在不公正基础上的行业中,在时尚产业不光彩的等级制度基础上,这个新获得的头衔实际上意味着什么?他们的精神和经济权利目前的命运如何?如何利用第2019/790号指令(DSM指令)为作者提供的机制来重新平衡该行业的动态?这些都是本文试图探讨的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信