Are stock buybacks in hospitality firms associated with outstanding executive stock options?

Raghavan Iyengar, Barry Shuster
{"title":"Are stock buybacks in hospitality firms associated with outstanding executive stock options?","authors":"Raghavan Iyengar, Barry Shuster","doi":"10.1108/bij-06-2023-0404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Outstanding unexercised stock options can motivate managers to engage in actions that increase the value of their company’s stock, including buying back their firm’s stock. The objective of granting stock options to managers is to align their interests with stockholders by tying a portion of their compensation to the company’s stock performance. However, unexercised stock options may have unintended consequences by providing managers with a vested interest in artificially boosting stock prices via stock buybacks. The primary objective of this research is to study the main factors that influence firms' buyback decisions amongst hospitality firms at a time when these firms were clamoring for taxpayer bailouts. Results from logistic regression seem to suggest that outstanding executive stock options are a major contributory factor in a firm’s buyback decision. Estimates also indicate that larger, more profitable firms will likely engage in stock buybacks. These findings survive a battery of tests.Design/methodology/approach The authors use logistic regression to predict the probability of a firm’s buyback decision based on a given set of exogenous explanatory variables.Findings The paper supports the hypothesis that buyback decisions are guided by the motive to prop support stock prices in the presence of outstanding restricted stock options/warrants granted to firms' executives.Research limitations/implications The paper focuses on the buyback decision of U.S. hospitality firms. The results, therefore, might not be generalizable to firms in other industries or countries.Practical implications U.S. share repurchase corporate policy and government regulation needs to be revisited given the economic imperative for firms to invest in activities to restore employment and put them in a position for economic recovery.Social implications Public criticism of the size, structure and form (i.e. loan vs grant) of COVID-19 bailouts warrants an examination of whether the factors that drive hospitality and tourism firms to repurchase shares support economic recovery.Originality/value Consistent with agency theory, the authors find a significant positive association between outstanding restricted stocks and a firm’s decision to support the stock prices by buying back shares.","PeriodicalId":502853,"journal":{"name":"Benchmarking: An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benchmarking: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-06-2023-0404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Outstanding unexercised stock options can motivate managers to engage in actions that increase the value of their company’s stock, including buying back their firm’s stock. The objective of granting stock options to managers is to align their interests with stockholders by tying a portion of their compensation to the company’s stock performance. However, unexercised stock options may have unintended consequences by providing managers with a vested interest in artificially boosting stock prices via stock buybacks. The primary objective of this research is to study the main factors that influence firms' buyback decisions amongst hospitality firms at a time when these firms were clamoring for taxpayer bailouts. Results from logistic regression seem to suggest that outstanding executive stock options are a major contributory factor in a firm’s buyback decision. Estimates also indicate that larger, more profitable firms will likely engage in stock buybacks. These findings survive a battery of tests.Design/methodology/approach The authors use logistic regression to predict the probability of a firm’s buyback decision based on a given set of exogenous explanatory variables.Findings The paper supports the hypothesis that buyback decisions are guided by the motive to prop support stock prices in the presence of outstanding restricted stock options/warrants granted to firms' executives.Research limitations/implications The paper focuses on the buyback decision of U.S. hospitality firms. The results, therefore, might not be generalizable to firms in other industries or countries.Practical implications U.S. share repurchase corporate policy and government regulation needs to be revisited given the economic imperative for firms to invest in activities to restore employment and put them in a position for economic recovery.Social implications Public criticism of the size, structure and form (i.e. loan vs grant) of COVID-19 bailouts warrants an examination of whether the factors that drive hospitality and tourism firms to repurchase shares support economic recovery.Originality/value Consistent with agency theory, the authors find a significant positive association between outstanding restricted stocks and a firm’s decision to support the stock prices by buying back shares.
酒店业公司的股票回购是否与未行使的高管股票期权有关?
目的 未行使的股票期权可以激励经理人采取提高公司股票价值的行动,包括回购公司股票。向经理人授予股票期权的目的是将他们的部分薪酬与公司的股票业绩挂钩,从而使他们的利益与股东的利益一致。然而,未行使的股票期权可能会产生意想不到的后果,即经理人成为通过股票回购人为抬高股价的既得利益者。本研究的主要目的是研究在酒店业企业中影响企业回购决策的主要因素,当时这些企业正急于获得纳税人的救助。逻辑回归的结果似乎表明,未行使的高管股票期权是影响公司回购决策的主要因素。估计结果还表明,规模更大、盈利能力更强的公司可能会进行股票回购。研究结果 本文支持这样的假设,即在公司高管持有尚未行使的限制性股票期权/认股权证的情况下,回购决策是由支撑股价的动机所引导的。研究局限/意义 本文主要关注美国酒店业公司的回购决策。社会影响 公众对 COBIT 的规模、结构和形式(即贷款与赠款)提出了批评。原创性/价值 与代理理论一致,作者发现流通受限股票与公司通过回购股票支持股价的决策之间存在显著的正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信